Reports have emerged suggesting that Bangladesh is conducting weapons training for civilians residing near the Indo-Bangladesh border, raising concerns in India and prompting calls for a reassessment of existing security agreements. Experts are advocating for the annulment of the Non-Lethal Treaty to grant the Border Security Force (BSF) greater operational freedom.
Sources indicate that Bangladesh has initiated training programs for civilians, instructing them in the use of small arms. This action has raised concerns that these civilians could be involved in border conflicts or confrontations with Indian border forces. It is speculated that this move may be intended to assert control over the border region or discourage Indian forces from cracking down on illegal activities such as smuggling, which are prevalent in the area.
The Indo-Bangladesh border is notoriously porous, facilitating various cross-border issues, including the smuggling of cattle, drugs, and humans. The training of civilians could further complicate these existing challenges.
India and Bangladesh had previously committed to using non-lethal weapons along the border to minimize civilian casualties and promote peaceful resolution of border disputes. However, with reports of Bangladesh arming civilians, Indian security analysts argue that the Non-Lethal Treaty restricts the BSF's ability to respond effectively, potentially jeopardizing the safety of Indian personnel and civilians.
Security experts, including those from think tanks and former military officials, are calling for a revision or complete withdrawal from the Non-Lethal Treaty. They contend that granting the BSF greater operational flexibility would enable more effective border security, particularly in light of these recent developments.
While the BSF has faced criticism in the past for using lethal force, the current situation has led to calls for a more robust approach to protect Indian interests and personnel. The BSF faces increased operational challenges when dealing with armed civilians, especially if these individuals are involved in supporting or concealing illegal cross-border activities.
This situation has the potential to strain diplomatic relations between India and Bangladesh, with possible implications for trade, cultural exchange, and regional stability. There is a growing consensus among security analysts that the Non-Lethal Treaty requires reevaluation. They propose that the BSF should be authorized to use lethal force when necessary to defend Indian territory and citizens.
In the meantime, there is a push for increased surveillance, both physical and technological, along the border to monitor these activities more effectively. While a tougher stance is being advocated, there are also calls for diplomatic engagement with Bangladesh to address these concerns, potentially leading to the negotiation of new terms for border management.
