Opinion How Russian Pantsir System's Performance Against Low-Flying Aircraft, Drones, and Helicopters Could Boost Indian Western Border Security

How Russian Pantsir System's Performance Against Low-Flying Aircraft, Drones, and Helicopters Could Boost Indian Western Border Security


India's western border with Pakistan presents a challenging security environment, requiring robust defence against a variety of aerial threats.

As India's mechanized forces patrol this volatile region, they face a growing vulnerability: an aging air defence network that struggles to effectively counter modern threats like drones, helicopters, low-flying aircraft, and precision-guided munitions.

While legacy systems such as the Soviet-era OSA-AKM (designated SA-8 Gecko by NATO) and handheld Igla missiles have been in service for many years, their limitations are becoming increasingly apparent.

The limitations of these older systems create potential gaps in India's air defenses that could be exploited by adversaries. The western frontier, which spans diverse terrains from the arid plains of Rajasthan to the mountainous regions of Jammu and Kashmir, demands a comprehensive defence.

The Indian Army's short-range air defence (SHORAD) currently relies heavily on the OSA-AKM, a system inducted in the 1980s. The OSA-AKM's 10-kilometer range and older radar technology make it less effective against stealthy or fast-moving modern threats.

Another system, the Tunguska Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun (SPAAG), also dates back to the Cold War and faces challenges with spare parts availability.

Handheld missile systems like the Igla-1M and Igla-S, while portable, are limited by their 5-6 kilometer range, which is insufficient to counter the growing drone capabilities of Pakistan or the potential threat from Chinese aircraft like the J-10 and H-6 bombers.

The Indian Army's fast-moving mechanized units, including tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and artillery, require a mobile and layered defence system to protect them effectively.

The current air defence systems, originally designed for a different era, are not well-suited to counter the low-altitude, high-speed threats that are prevalent on modern battlefields.

While India is developing indigenous systems like the Akash-NG and the Quick Reaction Surface-to-Air Missile (QRSAM), these are still undergoing testing and are not expected to be fully inducted before 2026. This creates a critical interim gap in India's defence capabilities.

The Russian-made Pantsir-S1 presents a potential solution to address this gap. Developed by the KBP Instrument Design Bureau, the Pantsir-S1 is a short-to-medium-range system that combines twelve 57E6-E missiles with twin 30mm autocannons.

This hybrid system has a range of 20 kilometers and can reach altitudes of 15 kilometers.

The Pantsir-S1's phased-array radar can track up to 20 targets and engage four simultaneously. It also includes an electro-optical backup system to counter jamming attempts.

The system is operated by a three-person crew and is typically mounted on a wheeled 8×8 chassis (though tracked variants exist), providing a combination of mobility and firepower. The Pantsir has seen use in conflicts like the Syrian Civil War, where it was reported to successfully intercept drones and missiles.

The Pantsir's capabilities are particularly relevant to India's needs. It offers a greater range than the OSA-AKM and Igla systems, can engage drones at 4 kilometers using its autocannons, and can engage aircraft or cruise missiles at 20 kilometers with its missiles.

Critically, its mobility allows it to keep pace with mechanized formations, a vital requirement for operations in areas like the plains of Punjab or the deserts of Rajasthan.

The potential acquisition of the Pantsir system is also attractive from a timing perspective. The Pantsir is an off-the-shelf system, meaning it could be deployed relatively quickly compared to the development timelines of India's indigenous systems.

While the Akash-NG and QRSAM are promising, they are not expected to be fully operational for several years. In the meantime, the threat posed by drones like Pakistan's Harop and the Turkish-supplied Bayraktar TB2, as well as China's loitering munitions, is immediate. An interim purchase of the Pantsir could provide a crucial stopgap, bolstering India's defenses until its own systems are ready.

Further enhancing the potential deal is a November 2024 agreement between Russia and Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) to explore co-production of the Pantsir.

Previous trials of the wheeled Pantsir in India reportedly encountered mobility issues in desert terrain. However, a tracked variant, specifically adapted to India's diverse environments, is being considered.

Local assembly under the "Make in India" initiative could potentially reduce costs (estimated to be between $15-20 million per unit) and alleviate the spare parts problems that have affected the Tunguska system.

While the Pantsir is not without its potential challenges. Although integration with India's existing Russian-sourced equipment, such as the S-400 air defence system and MiG-29 fighter jets, is expected to be relatively straightforward, compatibility with Western or indigenous systems like the Akash has not been fully tested.

Potential sanctions under the U.S. Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) are also a consideration, although Russia's use of alternative payment methods, such as UAE dirhams for S-400 transactions, may offer a possible solution.

While some critics argue that procuring a foreign system is unnecessary given the nearing readiness of the QRSAM. However, the immediate need for enhanced air defence capabilities along the western border may outweigh the desire to wait for the full deployment of indigenous systems. Acquiring an advanced system like the Pantsir could rapidly bridge the existing operational void.
 
General, don't have to worry. We will place more advanced radar from Russia with a range of 5000 km, also another 100 Swati radars and thousands of Pinaka missiles. It will take care of all threats.
 
It's a good weapon system, no doubt, and knocked out many Israeli glide bombs and cruise missiles as well in Syria. But in turn, many of them were taken out by Israeli action as well. A fully intact Pantsyr was captured by Turkey from the Libyan National Army and shipped to the US. All the secrets of the Pantsyr are open now.

The very fact that Russia is not supporting the Tunguska we bought a while ago should be a reminder of things to come when buying Russian weapons. Russia is very weak economically due to the war sanctions; it will be happy to sell and then forget about it. Its industry is right now totally focused on war with Ukraine. Is there any instance that we were happy with spares and support from Russia? I don't think so. The Su-30MKI spares support was a fiasco... became ok after pressure and threats from India to stop purchasing weapons. They obliged with spares and support. Again, when the MiG-29 was inducted, it was touted the F-16 slayer on paper, but the reliability was horrible. The engine had to be overhauled every 300 hrs rather than the 2000 hrs for Western engines! The MiG-29 fleet had a serviceable ratio of less than 50%. It was a nightmare. It's better to get the tech from Russia than buy outright.
 
Even this does not make sense, as in Ukraine, this SAM system, much like other Russian AD systems, has a mixed record.

As for quick delivery, again, this is extremely doubtful given that the S-400 has been delayed, and with the demand for Russian AD replacements itself quite high in Ukraine, it's very unlikely that Russia can successfully fulfill the Pantsir contract on time (which is the main issue here).

Plus, this system will still complicate logistics and training due to the imminent induction of domestic SAMs like Akash and QRSAM.

Finally, since India wants to explore deeper defense ties with the West, especially the F-35 etc., opting for an advanced Russian SAM does not make sense at this stage anyways.
 
Here's a quick comparison I picked from another article:

Akash-NG (India) – Medium-Range Mobile Air Defense
✅ Range: 70 km (longest among the three)
✅ Altitude Coverage: 50 m – 20 km
✅ Speed: Mach 2.5+
✅ Missiles per Launcher: 6
✅ Mobility: Truck-mounted, fully mobile
✅ Target Types: Fighter jets, UAVs, cruise missiles, helicopters
✅ Radar System: AESA radar for advanced multi-target tracking
✅ Strengths: Best range, accuracy, and radar coverage
❌ Weakness: Not as quick-reacting as QRSAM, requires radar support

QRSAM (India) – Quick-Reaction, Frontline Air Defense
✅ Range: 30 km (shorter than Akash-NG but optimized for rapid response)
✅ Altitude Coverage: 30 m – 6 km
✅ Speed: Mach 3 (fastest)
✅ Missiles per Launcher: 6
✅ Mobility: Highly mobile, truck-mounted for rapid deployment
✅ Target Types: Fighter jets, UAVs, helicopters
✅ Radar System: AESA radar with 360° tracking
✅ Strengths: Fastest reaction time, designed for moving convoys & tactical units
❌ Weakness: Shorter range than Akash-NG

Pantsir-S1 (Russia) – Short-Range Hybrid Air Defense
✅ Range: 20 km (missiles) + 4 km (guns)
✅ Altitude Coverage: 5 m – 15 km
✅ Speed: Mach 2.3
✅ Missiles per Launcher: 12 missiles + dual 30 mm cannons
✅ Mobility: Truck-mounted, mobile but less agile than QRSAM
✅ Target Types: Aircraft, drones, cruise missiles, guided bombs
✅ Radar System: PESA radar (older than AESA used in Akash-NG & QRSAM)
✅ Strengths: Dual capability (missiles + guns), good against drones & low-flying threats
❌ Weaknesses: Shortest range, older radar technology, slower reaction time than QRSAM
 
Its radar is not 3D nor AESA. Previously, there were clashes on this issue with Korean Biho 30.
 
Forget Pantsir...the article mentions the spares issue with Tunguska system...why buy into the same trap when we have QRSAM?
 
This close range AA and anti drone system is for protecting a bigger SAM system like S400 Triumph, its for point defence in a 10km detection and 5km kill zone as per Latakia base data in Syria where Turkish made drones attacked Russian base frequently and were put down by pentshir ,this may not be suitable for other traditional AA role thats anti aircraft of short ,where target is at high altitude and fast. Aircafts are not dead in era of drones but small drones or precision shells or anti radiation missiles like HARM can be hit by this Pentshir when approaching radar or SAM sites that are static and immovable of short notice. Traditional warfare is over in short and hybrid warfare thats a mix of WW1 and WW3 as a French source says is new way of war so out of box idea for survival of air assets is needed , as static fixed and know places like major baseswill be obliterated in few minutes in war scenario.This is not proven in mechanized formation protection role anywhere ,no such system has been deployed in Ukraine by Russia to kill drones that has killed 90% of armour on both sides recently as it self may not survive a very small drone on the go .Russian mechanized assults have been dead loss and now Ukraine has had same fate due to drones.
 
General, don't have to worry. We will place more advanced radar from Russia with a range of 5000 km, also another 100 Swati radars and thousands of Pinaka missiles. It will take care of all threats.
Pinaka is not an air defence system, but it's essentially an MLRS!!! Not the same thing. And radar alone can't do anything.
 
Even this does not make sense, as in Ukraine, this SAM system, much like other Russian AD systems, has a mixed record.

As for quick delivery, again, this is extremely doubtful given that the S-400 has been delayed, and with the demand for Russian AD replacements itself quite high in Ukraine, it's very unlikely that Russia can successfully fulfill the Pantsir contract on time (which is the main issue here).

Plus, this system will still complicate logistics and training due to the imminent induction of domestic SAMs like Akash and QRSAM.

Finally, since India wants to explore deeper defense ties with the West, especially the F-35 etc., opting for an advanced Russian SAM does not make sense at this stage anyways.
The analysis is very skewed. Pantsir has had an excellent track record both in Ukraine and Syria. For every one Pantsir or other Russian AD that we hear being struck in Ukr (once in a blue moon, that is), there are 100s of reports of them successfully taking out drones, missiles, and glide bombs on a daily basis. Not to mention constantly being upgraded according to changing tactics and threats, like Pantsir SMD and Tor M2.

No AD is 100% safe, especially when in a conflict with a peer adversary. Most (if not all) of the Russian AD that have been struck were on the move, reloading, or got hit AFTER emptying the entire salvo at dozens of targets with success. The track record is far better than NATO AD that gets hit every week and is constantly in critical shortage with Kiev. Not to mention constant RF drone, glide bomb, and missile hits on western Ukr getting past all the AD, even though Ukr AD covers a smaller, saturated area compared to the vast open areas of western Russia, spanning 3-4 times the territory of Ukr.

India has had a long history of Russian equipment induction. We already operate S400... Pantsir isn't going to complicate anything.

Pantsir is different from QRSAM and Akash, which are more akin to medium-range AD like Tor or Buk for slightly bigger targets. It's perfect for smaller drones and rockets at close ranges.

The memorandum signed calls for joint development and local production of Pantsir, taking lessons from Ukraine. I don't think delivery would be an issue, especially on the Russian side. BDL has an excellent manufacturing base and expertise right here in India to take care of it.

Last, F35 is a pipe dream that is more akin to a honey trap that's going to bankrupt us. India already operates S400, Su-30MKI, and Voronezh, so whatever situation Pantsir's gonna complicate has already been there from the very start. Pantsir is a potent short-range air defense solution that is highly mobile and can shoot on the run, unlike QRSAM or Akash.
 
Forget Pantsir...the article mentions the spares issue with Tunguska system...why buy into the same trap when we have QRSAM?
Qarsam is not the same as Pantsir. Both offer different air defence safety nets. Pantsir is a potent, battle-tested/upgraded AD that can shoot on the move... Qarsam cannot.

An MOU signed calls for co-development and local production of the equipment.

Tunguska is an outdated system that Russia itself has phased out. So yes, there are going to be spare issues.....it's really not a trap!!
 
What is the compatible system available with Isreal. We can look into that system. There technology is better and more destructive as they are surrounded by so called enemies. Who use drones.
 
To develop any mechanised aerial defence vehicle takes a long time to design, develop and manufacture.

We recently submitted a requirement to buy a tracked aerial defence vehicle to replace all of the old Russian systems we have. India should buy a few or manufacture it under a license until we develop our own system.

We should get the private sector to 100% indigenously design, develop and manufacture our own tracked air defence with our own missiles and guns. We should just get Kalyani or another company to develop and manufacture the air defence system.
 
About time India looked at the Ukraine war more closely and realised that Russian weapon systems esp their country warfare capabilities are far superior to anything NATO has not to mention Russian systems are rugged and serviceable compared to Western systems that are over sophisticated for real world scenarios. The Pantsir, Tor M1 & M2 are solid, reliable systems that thwart over 1000 NATO munitions everyday but all we ever hear about are the one or two that got through. Indian babus need to stop following the BBC, CNN, NYT media and look post observers on the ground!
 
The analysis is very skewed. Pantsir has had an excellent track record both in Ukraine and Syria. For every one Pantsir or other Russian AD that we hear being struck in Ukr (once in a blue moon, that is), there are 100s of reports of them successfully taking out drones, missiles, and glide bombs on a daily basis. Not to mention constantly being upgraded according to changing tactics and threats, like Pantsir SMD and Tor M2.

No AD is 100% safe, especially when in a conflict with a peer adversary. Most (if not all) of the Russian AD that have been struck were on the move, reloading, or got hit AFTER emptying the entire salvo at dozens of targets with success. The track record is far better than NATO AD that gets hit every week and is constantly in critical shortage with Kiev. Not to mention constant RF drone, glide bomb, and missile hits on western Ukr getting past all the AD, even though Ukr AD covers a smaller, saturated area compared to the vast open areas of western Russia, spanning 3-4 times the territory of Ukr.

India has had a long history of Russian equipment induction. We already operate S400... Pantsir isn't going to complicate anything.

Pantsir is different from QRSAM and Akash, which are more akin to medium-range AD like Tor or Buk for slightly bigger targets. It's perfect for smaller drones and rockets at close ranges.

The memorandum signed calls for joint development and local production of Pantsir, taking lessons from Ukraine. I don't think delivery would be an issue, especially on the Russian side. BDL has an excellent manufacturing base and expertise right here in India to take care of it.

Last, F35 is a pipe dream that is more akin to a honey trap that's going to bankrupt us. India already operates S400, Su-30MKI, and Voronezh, so whatever situation Pantsir's gonna complicate has already been there from the very start. Pantsir is a potent short-range air defense solution that is highly mobile and can shoot on the run, unlike QRSAM or Akash.
Exactly. You ticked off all the points. Russian AI-derived AD systems are coming out soon, taking lessons from the Pantsir, and if the Pantsir wasn't that good, the US wouldn't have told Ukraine to try and capture an intact Pantsir for study! NATO ADs have proven average against Russian counter EW suites, but the exaggerated hype surrounding NATO/US weapons is only exceeded by the buffoonish media, both abroad and in India, who are clueless and reproduce what the WaPo, NYT, CNN, or the Kyiv Independent publish! Indian babus & media hands, meanwhile, love their US junkets and consume the Amazon/Netflix-derived image of US weapon capabilities blindly!

In fact, an argument could be made that the West actually lost the arms race, focusing on inferior adversaries and police-level conflicts while the Russians were focusing on the long-term essential tasks and getting it done cheaply! As a result, Russian eqt, acdg to UA service personnel themselves (you'll never read this in the West), prefer their own eqt over NATO, not bec of sophistication but due to practicality - serviceability, ruggedness, and reliability! Acdg to the Ukrainians themselves - over 60% of Western-supplied eqt is faulty, has a high failure rate, and is rendered useless by Russian electronic warfare. Case in point - Ukraine fires over 700 drones, but we only hear of the five or six that hit a target, not the over 99% shot down by the Russian systems. The same goes for HIMARS, JDAMS, and 155mm art.

Even the Chinese, for all their mfg-based and electronic innovations, are inferior to the Russians when it comes to raw military power and technological prowess. Take, for instance, Russian jet engine technology in both military and civilian, Hypersonics, Subsurface vessels, Electronic warfare....& Acdg to people like Andrei Martyanov, if they're to be believed: the Chinese have a perfected HGV, but their hypersonics can't hit moving targets on the ocean accurately... they require Russian help and tech for that if they're to ever defend Taiwan. Chinese are still dependent on the US and EU for civilian jet engine tech, but the Russian MC21 is fully indigenous and the only civil aircraft with the highest %age of composites in the wing structure, a feat unthinkable before the Ukraine war! Chinese reverse engg of Russian Sukhois could not perfect high-altitude performance, and this is why Indian Su30s stationed near Ladakh always enjoy superiority over J-series engines, which suffer from underperformance. A lot of other factors, not to mention Russian nuclear submarine tech, esp stealth propulsion systems, rival or are considered superior to the US Los Angeles/Virginia class...

...we would be silly to not take Russian hardware more seriously after this war.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,394
Messages
47,663
Members
2,992
Latest member
sunil1304
Back
Top