India Flexes Naval Muscle with Twin-Carrier Operations in Arabian Sea

India Flexes Naval Muscle with Twin-Carrier Operations in Arabian Sea


In a powerful demonstration of its expanding naval capabilities, the Indian Navy showcased its operational readiness with a multi-carrier operation in the Arabian Sea. The event, attended by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, was held as part of the ongoing Naval Commanders Conference.

Dramatic footage released by the Indian Navy depicts two Russian-made MiG-29K fighter jets simultaneously launching from the decks of the aircraft carriers INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant. The jets then performed a cross-deck landing, a complex maneuver symbolizing the navy's capacity for coordinated operations and rapid force projection.

This striking demonstration of twin carrier operations highlights India's commitment to maintaining a high level of preparedness in the maritime sphere. It emphasizes the skill of Indian naval personnel and the technological sophistication underpinning the navy's aircraft carriers.

Of particular note is the participation of INS Vikrant, India's first indigenously built aircraft carrier. The carrier's commissioning in September 2022 marked a significant milestone in the nation's defence manufacturing capabilities. These multi-carrier operations demonstrate the seamless integration of INS Vikrant into the Indian Navy's operational fleet.

INS Vikramaditya, acquired from Russia in 2004 and commissioned in 2013, has served as a key component of India's naval strength. Its role in these operations further reinforces the navy's ability to strategically leverage its assets.

The success of these twin carrier operations not only displays India's maritime prowess but also sends a message of preparedness and deterrence within the evolving security landscape. The Indian Navy stands resolute in its commitment to safeguarding national interests and fostering stability throughout the Indo-Pacific region.
 
Let us start discussion on whether to build nuclear attack submarines or an aircraft carrier. This subject needs to be revisited. Arms salesmen, please excuse.
 
Let us start discussion on whether to build nuclear attack submarines or an aircraft carrier. This subject needs to be revisited. Arms salesmen, please excuse.
We already have 2 modern carriers but no nuclear attack subs. Point made, discussion closed
 
We need nuclear powered Carrier also for endless voyage to any part of the world.
No we dont. Our interests lie in our neighbourhood. We are not america, which is part of NATO and has military obligations and mutual defence treaties across the world, nor do we have military bases throughout the world for resupply and maintenance. We have 0 need for large nuclear powered carrier today. Maybe in 25-30 years when we are closer to china and USA in economic and military terms,we can focus on building large career fleet.
 
No we dont. Our interests lie in our neighbourhood. We are not america, which is part of NATO and has military obligations and mutual defence treaties across the world, nor do we have military bases throughout the world for resupply and maintenance. We have 0 need for large nuclear powered carrier today. Maybe in 25-30 years when we are closer to china and USA in economic and military terms,we can focus on building large career fleet.
We should not be short sighted, we need to make Military assets for tomorrow, not for this minute or second, Chinese are doing that already.
 
We should not be short sighted, we need to make Military assets for tomorrow, not for this minute or second, Chinese are doing that already.
Dude, we have much more pressing requirements such as drones and submarines along with 5th gen fighter. These have ccrucial requirements in the present. Nuclear powered super carrier is going to be most expensive asset whose requirement does noy even exist right now
 
Dude, we have much more pressing requirements such as drones and submarines along with 5th gen fighter. These have ccrucial requirements in the present. Nuclear powered super carrier is going to be most expensive asset whose requirement does noy even exist right now
I know , but it is better be future ready, even if it is not required. now, we might need them in the future and start moving towards that goal, for an example if we can make high power N-reactor for Attack submarines, it might find it’s use in submarines, destroyers, frigates and eventually carriers, we should not be constrained to IOR.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,407
Messages
33,625
Members
2,044
Latest member
ku.nj727
Back
Top