Indian Army to Induct 800 Mounted Gun System to Counter Drone Threats, But Towed Artillery Remains Relevant for High-Altitude

mounted-gun-system-mgs-developed-by-drdo-for-indian-army-min.webp


The Indian Army is set to significantly enhance its artillery capabilities with the planned acquisition of approximately 800 Mounted Gun Systems (MGS). These high-mobility, self-propelled howitzers are designed to provide a crucial edge in modern warfare, where battlefield agility and firepower are paramount.

This move is partly driven by the changing dynamics of conflict, as highlighted by the ongoing Ukraine-Russia war, where traditional towed artillery has proven vulnerable to drone attacks.

Despite this modernization effort, the Indian Army is adopting a balanced approach to its artillery strategy. While investing in MGS, it also continues to procure Towed Gun Systems (TGS), with plans to acquire 1400 units in multiple phases. This underscores the continued relevance of towed artillery for specific operational needs and terrains.

One of the primary drivers behind the Indian Army's decision to procure 800 MGS units is the increasing threat posed by drones on the battlefield. The conflict in Ukraine has starkly demonstrated the vulnerability of towed howitzers to drone strikes. These systems, often stationary and slower to reposition, are easy targets for enemy reconnaissance and targeting drones.

MGS, with their self-propelled design, offer superior mobility, enabling "shoot-and-scoot" tactics. This allows artillery units to fire and quickly relocate, minimizing their exposure to counter-battery fire and increasing survivability in dynamic combat situations. The high mobility of MGS gives the Indian Army a significant advantage in countering the evolving threat of drones, which are increasingly being used by adversaries to target static and vulnerable artillery positions.

However, the MGS faces limitations in high-altitude terrains like the Himalayas. Their 25-ton weight poses logistical challenges in such regions, where terrain and weather conditions can hinder the movement of heavy equipment. In these environments, lighter towed howitzers offer greater flexibility and can be deployed with relative ease, despite their vulnerability to drones.

Therefore, the Indian Army recognizes the continued need for towed artillery, particularly for high-altitude warfare. The TGS procurement program will equip the Army with a versatile range of artillery options that complement the MGS capabilities. Towed howitzers are more suitable for certain operational environments, particularly in mountainous terrain where the mobility of heavier MGS units is restricted. Additionally, the lower cost and simpler logistics associated with towed artillery make them a valuable asset.

By pursuing a dual approach of procuring both MGS and TGS, the Indian Army ensures it has the flexibility to respond effectively to diverse battlefield scenarios. The MGS will provide high-mobility fire support in plains, deserts, and semi-urban environments, while towed howitzers will continue to play a crucial role in mountainous and high-altitude areas. This balanced approach will ensure the Indian Army maintains a robust and adaptable artillery force capable of meeting the challenges of modern warfare.
 
If the IA is really spooked by weight and cost issues associated with mounted howitzers, then it should ideally order many new 105mm towed guns instead of just placing faith in heavier 155x52mm towed guns.

I don't really understand these weird half-measures undertaken by the services. They order something in a quantity that does not add substantially to overall firepower while creating logistical and maintenance issues all the same.
 
If the IA is really spooked by weight and cost issues associated with mounted howitzers, then it should ideally order many new 105mm towed guns instead of just placing faith in heavier 155x52mm towed guns.

I don't really understand these weird half-measures undertaken by the services. They order something in a quantity that does not add substantially to overall firepower while creating logistical and maintenance issues all the same.
Please note: the Army is still conservative in its approach. Any change in design or featured material will get resistance. This is the main reason. Second, as you said, the cost associated with the vehicle-mounted system. Our suppliers will get more prices, maybe double.
 
Towed artillery has advantage over Mounted guns as they are cheaper and easier to mantain and operate. Being light weight, they can be taken anywhere the Army wants.
 
Towed artillery has advantage over Mounted guns as they are cheaper and easier to mantain and operate. Being light weight, they can be taken anywhere the Army wants.
Yes and no, while being cheaper to operate if they get destroyed they are worth nothing so they are essentially worthless in all aspects
 
We need to very well understand that the majority of the border is in the mountains, marshes, desert, badlands and soft paddy fields. So towed artillery that distributes load and separates ammo,crew and gun is best suited for our future war.
 
What is problem with defence department. We need atleast 5000 pc by now and still waiting. And thinking for 800. God save my country. What r u expecting our soldiers to run in raining of enemy artillery shells. Atleast order 400 tactical nukes if u don't have money to buy artillery. It will be cheaper. Atomic mfg dept will do it in few months. Material is ready.
 
Please note: the Army is still conservative in its approach. Any change in design or featured material will get resistance. This is the main reason. Second, as you said, the cost associated with the vehicle-mounted system. Our suppliers will get more prices, maybe double.
That is true. The IA is indeed very conservative, as they inherited that from the British colonial legacy. But then again, so is the IN, but in the latter's case, it gets a rather tiny budget to fiddle around with, so they need to be a little more innovative, unlike the massive IA.

Plus, unlike the IA, which needs to not only guard India's long and tough borders 24/7 but also needs to step up when dealing with various insurgencies plaguing the country, the IN meanwhile is relatively safe from day-to-day combat scenarios, all while it has the natural home advantage of the IOR against potential threats, plus recently sharing a productive and growing relationship with Western navies.

So, both services are ultimately dealing with their own different challenges with the resources at hand.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,615
Messages
34,989
Members
2,151
Latest member
DCompany who????
Back
Top