NAMICA MK2 Prioritizes Battlefield Versatility: Reduced Missile Loadout, Added 30mm Cannon

NAMICA MK2 Prioritizes Battlefield Versatility: Reduced Missile Loadout, Added 30mm Cannon


Initial images of India's next-generation anti-tank missile platform, the NAMICA MK2, reveal a shift in emphasis. While the revised design retains the core anti-tank role of its predecessor, the MK2 appears geared towards expanded battlefield versatility.

Armament Trade-offs​

The most striking change is in the vehicle's primary armament. The six-launcher configuration of the NAMICA MK1, armed with NAG (Fire and Forget) anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs), has been reduced to four.

This reduction, however, is counterbalanced by the addition of a 30mm cannon. This inclusion significantly broadens the platform's potential targets with greater effectiveness against light armored vehicles, infantry, and field fortifications.

Role Evolution​

The shift in armament suggests a potential evolution in the NAMICA's battlefield role. While the MK2 remains a dedicated anti-tank platform, the 30mm cannon indicates adaptability beyond this primary task.

This increased flexibility allows the NAMICA MK2 to contribute more actively to combined arms operations where the ability to engage a variety of threats is crucial.

Proven Foundations and Modifications​

The NAMICA MK2 continues to utilize the reliable BMP-2 chassis, renowned for its mobility in diverse terrain.

As with the MK1, designers have foregone the BMP-2's passenger compartment, likely to accommodate additional missile reloads, ensuring the MK2 maintains a substantial anti-tank capacity.

Implications and Outlook​

These initial design sketches indicate that the NAMICA MK2 is moving steadily along its development path.

The emphasis on adaptability, while maintaining a powerful anti-tank capability, positions the NAMICA MK2 as a potentially valuable asset in future armored conflicts.

The platform's continuing evolution is likely to be closely observed by military analysts as it prepares for broader service with the Indian armed forces.
 
Until a new generation of armored fighting vehicles comes on to help IA for launch of ATGMs, this upgraded Namica Mk2 will do wonderful job in countering two enemies.
 
Now we know why NAMICA was not inducted in much larger numbers. Army had sent feedback on what changes it wanted, and they were designing the mk2 variant. This is very good. This is how military equipment is supposed to be made. Give small orders for first few iterations, and once you have the final product, give massive orders. The BMP2 is an IFV focused on troop tranaport while NAMICA would be an IFV focused strictly in offense.

We need IFV with air defence as well, to protect both the earlier IFVs.
 
Now we know why NAMICA was not inducted in much larger numbers. Army had sent feedback on what changes it wanted, and they were designing the mk2 variant. This is very good. This is how military equipment is supposed to be made. Give small orders for first few iterations, and once you have the final product, give massive orders. The BMP2 is an IFV focused on troop tranaport while NAMICA would be an IFV focused strictly in offense.

We need IFV with air defence as well, to protect both the earlier IFVs.
Which platform has IA ordered in bulk after years of testing. Now it is namica mk2, tomorrow it will be mk3.
 
IAs hopeless procurement cycle is wild goose chase. They will not induct anything, just send them back to drawing board, all the while trying to open backdoor for imports.
 
Which platform has IA ordered in bulk after years of testing. Now it is namica mk2, tomorrow it will be mk3.
ATAGS got a 300+ order. Now a lighter version is being developed for the latest army tender, then 400 will be procured.

I know what you mean, u til now army favoured giving 1000+ orders for imported systems. We were not developing indigenous systems. Most of indigenous development for army has started recently in past 10 years. The WhAP and other armored platforms have received few orders, army will use them then give feedback, which will be incorporated, then more orders will come
 
ATAGS got a 300+ order. Now a lighter version is being developed for the latest army tender, then 400 will be procured.

I know what you mean, u til now army favoured giving 1000+ orders for imported systems. We were not developing indigenous systems. Most of indigenous development for army has started recently in past 10 years. The WhAP and other armored platforms have received few orders, army will use them then give feedback, which will be incorporated, then more orders will come
"The secret of the ATAGS longer range is its larger chamber – 25 liters, compared to 23 liters in most 155-millimetre guns."
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering
(IJERMCE)
Vol 3, Issue 4, April 2018
All Rights Reserved © 2018 IJERMCE 417
Review on Advance Towed Artillery Gun System
[1] Omkar R. Girame, [2] Hemant V. Kadam, [3] Suvarna D. Khakal, [4] Nilesh D. Bagul

The facts are that having larger chamber means it will be heavier as it supports more charges and so has greater power that what gives it range. So a gun with less a smaller chamber would be lighter supporting less explosive power and range. Yes, they can redesign, but it takes years to test and make new, so better order a more capable gun then grumble about ten twenty percent more weight.
 
"The secret of the ATAGS longer range is its larger chamber – 25 liters, compared to 23 liters in most 155-millimetre guns."
International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering
(IJERMCE)
Vol 3, Issue 4, April 2018
All Rights Reserved © 2018 IJERMCE 417
Review on Advance Towed Artillery Gun System
[1] Omkar R. Girame, [2] Hemant V. Kadam, [3] Suvarna D. Khakal, [4] Nilesh D. Bagul

The facts are that having larger chamber means it will be heavier as it supports more charges and so has greater power that what gives it range. So a gun with less a smaller chamber would be lighter supporting less explosive power and range. Yes, they can redesign, but it takes years to test and make new, so better order a more capable gun then grumble about ten twenty percent more weight.
I think army knows more than you or me on why 3 ton weight reduction is so important. They have already ordered 300+ ATAGS. Maybe they see it as worth it for slight range reduction
 
Looks like inspired from the Berezhok turret of the BMP-2M with the two twin atgm launchers and main gun
 
How many are produced and plan to induct? If the number is small it really does not matter.

NAG/NAMICA,Dhruvasrtra and all new fancy variants are successful testing phase for past 10 years atleast and very few inducted. So if you want this to run as your pet project where you do development and no orders then go for it
 
Now we know why NAMICA was not inducted in much larger numbers. Army had sent feedback on what changes it wanted, and they were designing the mk2 variant. This is very good. This is how military equipment is supposed to be made. Give small orders for first few iterations, and once you have the final product, give massive orders. The BMP2 is an IFV focused on troop tranaport while NAMICA would be an IFV focused strictly in offense.

We need IFV with air defence as well, to protect both the earlier IFVs.
How long? Army should have involved and corrected course much earlier. Why they sleep and go into endless testing, modification, re testing phase when there is no intention to induct. This stupidity must stop now
 
I think army knows more than you or me on why 3 ton weight reduction is so important. They have already ordered 300+ ATAGS. Maybe they see it as worth it for slight range reduction
ATAGS is not ordered, just like K-9 repeat order never placed. Last confirmed news that ATAGS order "WILL BE" placed by July-2024 and we all know it is moving goal post
 
ATAGS is not ordered, just like K-9 repeat order never placed. Last confirmed news that ATAGS order "WILL BE" placed by July-2024 and we all know it is moving goal post
Well, if they said it, i think they will do it. They can drag their feet though.
 
ATAGS got a 300+ order. Now a lighter version is being developed for the latest army tender, then 400 will be procured.

I know what you mean, u til now army favoured giving 1000+ orders for imported systems. We were not developing indigenous systems. Most of indigenous development for army has started recently in past 10 years. The WhAP and other armored platforms have received few orders, army will use them then give feedback, which will be incorporated, then more orders will come
But when imports happen. The same thing is done with bulk orders and not piecemeal. That helps in setting up viable ecosystem and will inturn help to improve thier product in next batch as part of iterative development. All this while, using our tax payers money to further some other foreign country MIC who will most likely use it to needle us.
 
Looks like many in comments section know more than what Indian Army needs to fight a battle. Really hilarious.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,407
Messages
33,630
Members
2,044
Latest member
ku.nj727
Back
Top