Jane Marriott, the UK High Commissioner to Pakistan, recently caused controversy with a visit to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK).
Although the region's significance as a centre for diaspora relationships and UK-Pakistan relations was highlighted in her official statement, opinions on the visit have been divided on both sides of the border.
Marriott purportedly came to Mirpur, a place where there is a sizable population of British Pakistanis, to foster interpersonal relationships.
She emphasised that cooperation is essential for the interests of the diaspora because 70% of British Pakistanis can trace their ancestry to Mirpur.
This emphasis on common heritage and cultural ties is in line with the UK's more general diplomatic objectives in the area.
But there are political ramifications to the visit as well. POK is a contested region that India and Pakistan both claim. Historically, the Indian government has opposed foreign involvement in the area because it sees it as an infringement on its sovereignty.
The timing of this visit coincides with increased tensions between Pakistan and India, adding to the possibility of diplomatic complications.
Divergent opinions have been expressed about Marriott's visit.
Some Pakistani officials and civilians applauded the gesture, seeing it as recognition of the region's importance and the UK's commitment to developing relations with Pakistan.
Others, on the other hand, voiced worry that the visit may be seen as implicit recognition of Pakistan's sovereignty over the disputed area.
In the future, the UK will have to exercise caution to make sure that its involvement in the area stays positive and doesn't fuel already-existing tensions.
Navigating this complicated issue and maintaining regional peace will need open engagement and communication with both India and Pakistan.
Ultimately, how Marriott's visit is handled in the upcoming months and years will determine whether or not it improves UK-Pakistani relations.
