With Rafale M Selected, Indian Navy May Face Challenges Similar to MiG-29K Regarding Non-Foldable Wings and Training Limitations on Decks

With Rafale M Selected, Indian Navy May Face Challenges Similar to MiG-29K Regarding Non-Foldable Wings and Training Limitations on Decks


Concerns have been raised over the Indian Navy's selection of the Rafale M fighter jet, with a serving naval official pointing out potential operational limitations similar to those experienced with the MiG-29K.

A key issue lies in the Rafale M's non-foldable wings, which pose challenges for storage and maneuverability on the relatively confined decks of India's aircraft carriers, INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant. This design constraint could limit the number of aircraft deployable on a carrier at any given time, impacting operational flexibility.

Furthermore, the Rafale M's twin-seater trainer variant is not carrier-compatible. This necessitates land-based training for pilots, hindering the development of crucial skills required for carrier take-offs and landings. While simulations and touch-and-go training can partially compensate, they cannot fully replicate the real-world conditions of carrier operations.

This contrasts with the MiG-29KUB, the twin-seater trainer variant of the MiG-29K, which is carrier-capable and provides a more realistic training environment. However, due to a series of crashes and subsequent scarcity, the Indian Navy's use of the MiG-29KUB has been limited, increasing reliance on simulators.

The official, who remained anonymous, suggested that the decision to procure the Rafale M was influenced by logistical and financial considerations, echoing the rationale behind the earlier MiG-29K acquisition. This raises concerns that operational efficiency may have been compromised in favor of commonality with the Indian Air Force's Rafale fleet and potential cost savings.

These limitations could impact the Indian Navy's operational readiness, particularly in terms of aircraft handling and pilot proficiency on carrier decks. The lack of a carrier-borne trainer aircraft may necessitate increased investment in simulation technologies or alternative training solutions to ensure pilots are adequately prepared for carrier operations.

While the Rafale M undoubtedly brings advanced combat capabilities to the Indian Navy, these concerns highlight the complexities of integrating foreign technology into the unique operational environment of aircraft carrier operations. The Navy may need to explore further modifications to the Rafale M or invest in enhanced training programs to mitigate these challenges and ensure optimal operational effectiveness.

The decision to acquire the Rafale M, despite its limitations, may have long-term implications for the Navy's carrier operations and future fleet composition.
 
LCA Naval version would be better to induct for take-off and landing on deck for trainer purposes. Order one squadron of LCA Naval version.
 
Um, nope. We got the MiG-29K in the late 2000s because that was the only viable option. The other option was the Su-33, and that would be even more useless for us. Aircraft like the Rafale M and F-18 weren't exactly available for us back then.

As for the Rafale M, well, if the trainers cannot be used on carries, that leaves us 22 Rafale Ms and, say, 24-30 MiG-29Ks (assuming a serviceability of 60-75% over a fleet of 40), plus 4 Rafale M trainers and 5 MiG-29K trainers which we ideally shouldn't be putting on carriers. That comes to 46-52 jets, which is just about enough for two minimalistic carrier air wings of 24-26 jets each.

TEDBF needs to be fast-tracked asap. We cannot wait until the MiG-29K becomes another MiG-21 saga. In the meantime, if it is absolutely necessary, the Navy might have to borrow a few of the IAF's Rafale trainers.
 
When any military deal is going to happen, we have many desperate unknown sources and their agents who come out with such useless articles.
 
Is it possible to modify Vikrant lift to accomodate large aircraft?
Yes, but that modification would essentially entail breaking off a part of the flight deck and fitting in a new lift. It is something that could be done during the carrier's first major refit.
 
Land based trainers are not exactly a bad thing (safer atleast). But I can understand real life landing on carriers is quite difficult. Navy can share 60 percent of training with the airforce to reduce costs.

Also just ask the French what do they do and how do they train.

Besides that this article seems like petty hit piece in Rafale. Someone is not happy that we don't buy Russian anymore.
 
Rafale M is a very very very expensive deal. $ 7 billion for just 26 Rafale M's.

Limitations of wings is very severe.

Limitations of Trainers is also very severe.
 
66,000 crores for 26 Rafale-M's as per TOI. That means INR 2,538 crores per plane. Buying planes with this cost figures with limitations is suicide as this purchase will literally suck out the entire capex budget for the IN.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,859
Messages
40,172
Members
2,553
Latest member
Ex Signals
Back
Top