Can ISRO's Rocket Engine Prowess Help in India's Pursuit of Indigenous Fighter Jet Engines?

rocket-engine-vs-fighter-jet-engine.webp


Dr. S. Somanath, Chairman of ISRO, recently sparked a nationwide debate with his remarks on India's contrasting achievements in rocket and aircraft engine development.

While celebrating ISRO's success in building indigenous rocket engines, he highlighted the continued reliance on foreign technology for fighter jet engines, raising the question: Can ISRO's expertise bridge this gap?

Dr. Somanath emphasized ISRO's comprehensive engine development program, encompassing a wide range of propulsion systems for rockets, all designed and manufactured within India. This self-reliance stands in stark contrast to India's dependence on imported engines for its Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas, which currently utilizes General Electric F404 and F414 engines.

ISRO's impressive track record includes the development of powerful cryogenic engines, a technology mastered by only a handful of nations. These engines have powered successful missions like Mangalyaan, Chandrayaan, and the upcoming Gaganyaan human spaceflight program. This mastery of complex propulsion technologies has positioned India as a leading force in space exploration.

Dr. Somanath's comments, while not an official proposal, have reignited discussions on whether ISRO could contribute to developing indigenous jet engines for military aircraft. This is a long-standing aspiration for India, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign technology and bolster its defense capabilities.

The challenges in developing high-performance jet engines are significant. These engines must withstand extreme temperatures and pressures while delivering the thrust required for supersonic flight. Despite decades of effort, India has yet to produce a jet engine that meets these demanding requirements.

However, ISRO's expertise in engine design, testing, and manufacturing could potentially be leveraged to accelerate progress. The organization's experience with advanced materials, complex combustion processes, and sophisticated control systems could prove invaluable in overcoming the technological hurdles.

Furthermore, ISRO's development of the Next-Generation Launch Vehicle (NGLV), also known as Soorya, showcases its continued push for innovation in propulsion technology. The NGLV is expected to feature cutting-edge engines for manned and heavy-lift missions, further demonstrating ISRO's capabilities.

While the direct transfer of rocket engine technology to jet engines may not be straightforward, ISRO's expertise could undoubtedly contribute to overcoming critical challenges. Whether through collaboration with existing defense research organizations or a more direct role, ISRO's involvement could potentially accelerate India's pursuit of self-reliance in fighter jet engine technology.
 
Even with ISRO's involvements, need BARE MINIMUM 10 years for Kaveri2.0 to FOC properly 100% completely.....
Jet engine is about capability and we don't have it as of today. GTRE is the most qualified organization to chair such an effort. I believe in terms of certified materials available today, I am sure there will be some level of DRDO-ISRO cooperation and coordination even today - on maintaining and building such a material library.

Govt should stop bean counting and spend ten times on this problem. I doubt if ISRO will necessarily be better at managing and building consensus between different research lab, production partners, academic institution, than say DRDO/GTRE.
 
Just one curious question why didn't ISRO raised hands earlier or should I say what was kaveri team thinking they could have asked for ISROs help earlier.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,559
Messages
37,998
Members
2,448
Latest member
mwm131
Back
Top