Critical Urgency Stressed for India's AMCA Development as Relevance Window Narrows with Accelerating 6th-Gen Programs Globally

Critical Urgency Stressed for India's AMCA Development as Relevance Window Narrows with Accelerating 6th-Gen Programs Globally


India's programme to develop the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), envisioned as a 5.5-generation stealth fighter, is facing increased scrutiny as leading global aerospace nations push forward with highly advanced sixth-generation fighter projects.

Amid this rapidly evolving technological landscape, Air Marshal S.B.P. Sinha (Retd.), a former Deputy Chief of the Indian Air Force (IAF), has asserted the continued importance of the AMCA, highlighting that it was designed specifically to meet India's unique strategic requirements rather than compete directly with speculative future aircraft like the conceptual F-47 or J-36 often discussed in defence circles.

However, the acceleration of next-generation fighter concepts worldwide introduces a pressing challenge. Experts suggest the timeframe for the AMCA to maintain its peak operational significance is diminishing, placing critical importance on India rapidly advancing the aircraft's development and production phases to ensure its competitiveness in future air combat scenarios.

Air Marshal Sinha, drawing on his extensive experience with the IAF's modernisation efforts, emphasizes that the AMCA's primary value proposition is its tailored capability for India's operational context.

In recent remarks, he explained the AMCA aims to provide the IAF with dominance in regional airspace, seamless integration with indigenous systems such as the Uttam radar and Astra missile, and effective operation within contested environments.

He dismissed comparisons with potential sixth-generation platforms from the US or China as premature, stating, "The AMCA is about capability, not competition with platforms that don’t yet exist in operational form."

Despite this focus on national needs, the global military aviation sector is undergoing significant transformation. Nations including the United States (with its Next Generation Air Dominance - NGAD program), the United Kingdom and partners (developing Tempest/Global Combat Air Programme), and China (with its rumoured J-XX projects) are actively pursuing sixth-generation technologies.

These future concepts often include features like artificial intelligence (AI)-driven autonomous functions, advanced networking, directed-energy capabilities, and the flexibility of being optionally manned. The progress in these programs, alongside advancements by regional players like Turkey and South Korea in sophisticated aircraft development, potentially narrows the technological advantage India seeks.

This global push towards the next generation underscores a potential risk tied to the AMCA's development schedule. Recent clearance by India's Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) in March 2024 sanctioned the development of AMCA prototypes, a crucial step forward.

However, current projections anticipate the first flight of the AMCA Mk1 around 2028-2029, with squadron induction potentially starting in the mid-2030s. The more advanced Mk2 version aims for full operational capability by 2040. This timeline carries the risk of overlapping significantly with the expected entry into service of sixth-generation fighters globally, which could impact the AMCA's relative capability upon its wider deployment.

Air Marshal Sinha expresses confidence in the AMCA's eventual contribution, viewing it not as an attempt to match global competitors but as a vital asset tailored for India's defence needs over the next three decades. He envisions the AMCA acting as a force multiplier, networked with India's drones, Airborne Warning and Control Systems (AWACS), and missile defence infrastructure.

Nevertheless, he stressed that efficient and timely execution is paramount, concluding, "We have the talent and the vision. Now we need speed."
 
I’m not talking about the jet. I’m talking about the engine only. Military and MoD officials will obviously have preliminary/informal discussions with foreign companies to discuss the technology, capabilities, metallurgy, costs, ToT, IPR etc. The government ministers aren’t experts and they usually come involved at the middle/end stage mainly when a deal is mainly worked out.
I am also talking about the engines. Now don't club military and MoD together. MoD officials have discussions with foreign companies, military doesn't. Your original comment mentioned only military. That is wrong. DRDO officials are employees of MoD, so they count as MoD official and are involved. Other officials might also be involved at times. But not the military officials.
 
I am also talking about the engines. Now don't club military and MoD together. MoD officials have discussions with foreign companies, military doesn't. Your original comment mentioned only military. That is wrong. DRDO officials are employees of MoD, so they count as MoD official and are involved. Other officials might also be involved at times. But not the military officials.
The military are involved in those discussions and committee as not even MoD officials are experts or knowledgeable about engine development. Can you picture a MoD official with no knowledge about the kind of advanced engine technology that’s available who sits with a foreign company and when they talk in depth about the science, engineering and technical discussions that person doesn’t know an answer to something or needs clarification? Will he stop the meeting and ring the military for answers? Also why do military officials visit those companies to check out their facilities, equipment and capabilities then?
 
The military are involved in those discussions and committee as not even MoD officials are experts or knowledgeable about engine development. Can you picture a MoD official with no knowledge about the kind of advanced engine technology that’s available who sits with a foreign company and when they talk in depth about the science, engineering and technical discussions that person doesn’t know an answer to something or needs clarification? Will he stop the meeting and ring the military for answers? Also why do military officials visit those companies to check out their facilities, equipment and capabilities then?
MoD officials have no knowledge? What are you talking about? DRDO is a department under MoD. DRDO head is a secretary level officer in MoD. He is the one who leads the discussions, either directly or via his representatives. Are you saying he has no knowledge about jet engine technology? Yes I know, he is incompetent. But that's the one our government entrusts to lead these talks.

As for why they visit them, please show me when did any IAF chief visit GE engine manufacturing facility.
 
MoD officials have no knowledge? What are you talking about? DRDO is a department under MoD. DRDO head is a secretary level officer in MoD. He is the one who leads the discussions, either directly or via his representatives. Are you saying he has no knowledge about jet engine technology? Yes I know, he is incompetent. But that's the one our government entrusts to lead these talks.

As for why they visit them, please show me when did any IAF chief visit GE engine manufacturing facility.
MoD and bureaucrats won’t have such a good understanding of the advanced technology requirement, science and technology as the military will which is why they are involved in discussions with other foreign engine companies.

Also officials have visited Safran and RR as they are offering 100% of the technology and local production and GE aren’t.
 
Let India focus on AMCA 5th generation stealth fighter first and 110kn engine joint development.
After that we can quickly move to 6th generation with additional stealth features in aircraft and engine exhaust nozzle.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,595
Messages
49,303
Members
3,087
Latest member
Ash
Back
Top