DRDO Explores to Convert Agni-V ICBM into Air Burst and Bunker Buster Variants with 7.5-Tonne Conventional Warhead

DRDO Explores to Convert Agni-V ICBM into Air Burst and Bunker Buster Variants with 7.5-Tonne Conventional Warhead


India is reportedly in the initial phases of a significant strategic project to develop a conventional, non-nuclear variant of its premier Agni-V intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).

The new version is being designed to carry a massive 7.5-tonne warhead, a move that signals a major enhancement of the country's tactical strike capabilities.

This development initiative, led by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), aims to adapt the proven, long-range Agni-V platform for conventional warfare scenarios.

The project highlights India's strategic focus on building a credible high-impact, precision-strike force to address modern security challenges and deter regional threats without crossing the nuclear threshold.

The primary trade-off for carrying such a heavy conventional payload is a reduction in the missile's operational range.

While the nuclear-capable Agni-V can strike targets beyond 5,000 kilometres, the new conventional variant will have its range adjusted to an estimated 2,000 to 2,500 kilometres.

This modification is a deliberate choice, prioritising the ability to deliver a devastating conventional blow to critical targets within India's immediate and extended neighbourhood.

The Agni-V, a cornerstone of India's strategic deterrence, is a three-stage, solid-fuelled missile celebrated for its high accuracy, advanced navigation, and canister-launch system that provides operational flexibility.

It is expected that the conventional variant will retain these core technological strengths, ensuring precise targeting of enemy assets even with the substantially heavier warhead.

This diversification of the Agni-V platform provides India with a powerful conventional deterrent.

It enhances the nation's ability to conduct rapid and decisive strikes against high-value strategic targets, such as command-and-control centres, major infrastructure, and fortified military facilities.

This capability is particularly relevant in countering adversaries who rely on hardened or deeply buried structures to protect their key assets.

Two Specialised Warhead Configurations​

To meet diverse mission requirements, the conventional Agni-V is planned to be developed with two distinct types of warheads:
  • Airburst Warhead: This variant is designed to detonate at a specific altitude above a target area. The resulting explosion creates a massive shockwave and disperses lethal fragments over a wide radius, making it highly effective for neutralising large, exposed targets like military convoys, airfields, and logistics hubs.
  • Bunker Buster Warhead: This penetrator variant is engineered to destroy heavily fortified and underground structures. Capable of piercing facilities buried 80 to 100 metres deep, this warhead would first penetrate the surface and then detonate, ensuring the destruction of hardened command posts or concealed weapon storage sites. This provides a critical capability for modern warfare scenarios where vital assets are often protected underground.
 
I think we should use bombs like gbu not missiles as they are not capable to carry required war heads for destroying something like underground nuclear facilities even Israel tried but failed . Agni missile is very good but when comes to precision strikes like to hit core guided bombs like gbu is much more effective
 
It can also be used to obliterate aircraft carrier strike groups. Can someone compare Agni V vs Dongfeng conventional variants?
 
It can also be used to obliterate aircraft carrier strike groups. Can someone compare Agni V vs Dongfeng conventional variants?
That will be a huge waste. A ship can be sunk even by smaller missiles. Agni 5 weighs 50+ tons and is definitely overkill for taking out a ship. India has the Shaurya missile for that.
 
It can also be used to obliterate aircraft carrier strike groups. Can someone compare Agni V vs Dongfeng conventional variants?
Ballistic missiles are generally not well-suited for attacking naval formations, since last-minute maneuvering is difficult.

What you need for such scenarios is a ballistic missile with either a HGV or MARVs.

We know for a fact that the Agni-II and Agni-P are capable of carrying MARVs, but this capability has not been proven on the Agni-V. Therefore, unless we can get MARVs on, or possibly fit a HGV onto an Agni-V, the usefulness would be limited. Of course, the air-burst version would be useful, but just how effective a 7.5 ton warhead would be in air-burst mode is a matter of discussion.
 
Ballistic missiles are generally not well-suited for attacking naval formations, since last-minute maneuvering is difficult.

What you need for such scenarios is a ballistic missile with either a HGV or MARVs.

We know for a fact that the Agni-II and Agni-P are capable of carrying MARVs, but this capability has not been proven on the Agni-V. Therefore, unless we can get MARVs on, or possibly fit a HGV onto an Agni-V, the usefulness would be limited. Of course, the air-burst version would be useful, but just how effective a 7.5 ton warhead would be in air-burst mode is a matter of discussion.
The biggest question is if a 6-7 ton bomb is needed at all for a ship. A carrier strike group will not be very close to one another, within just a few kilometers gap, but spread out over a few tens of kilometers. So, no matter how big a bomb is used, it can't hit multiple ships at once. For a single ship, even a 200kg BrahMos can sink it.
 
Wow. By just doing a back-of-the-hand calculation, it is clear that this will surpass even the GBU-57 bomb in all parameters. Imaging this warhead with hypersonic speed is just mind-boggling and a nightmare for enemies.

True fruits of indigenization when it comes to capability addition.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,751
Messages
53,303
Members
3,606
Latest member
suro789
Back
Top