Analysis Evaluating a "Made in India" Rafale F4: Could Local Production Costs Undercut France Despite Significant Technology Transfer Expenses?

Evaluating a Made in India Rafale F4: Could Local Production Costs Undercut France Despite Significant Technology Transfer Expenses?


The United Arab Emirates' substantial $18 billion agreement for 80 Rafale F4 fighter jets, signed in December 2021 with France's Dassault Aviation, represents the largest export order for this advanced aircraft.

This deal, including helicopters and support, has intensified discussions about the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of manufacturing the Rafale F4 in India under the nation's Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative, especially as India aims to strengthen its air and naval forces.

Using the UAE contract as a reference point, this analysis explores the potential costs and challenges of domestically producing the Rafale F4, considering India's specific defence requirements and industrial landscape.

Understanding the Benchmark: The UAE Rafale F4 Deal​

The UAE's $18 billion package secures 80 Rafale F4 aircraft, alongside extensive support, logistics, training, spare parts, and weapons integration, with deliveries expected from 2027. This equates to roughly $225 million per aircraft.

However, this figure includes significant non-airframe elements like munitions, maintenance infrastructure, and comprehensive support packages, which typically constitute 30-40% of such deals. Adjusting for these factors, the estimated 'flyaway cost' (the cost of the aircraft itself) for a UAE Rafale F4 likely falls between $140 million and $160 million.

The F4 variant represents a considerable advancement over the F3R standard currently operated by the Indian Air Force (IAF), featuring upgrades like enhanced Thales RBE2 AESA radar, improved electronic warfare suites, advanced sensors (including a new IRST), superior network connectivity, and integration of newer weapons like the MICA NG missile and 1,000kg AASM Hammer munitions.

Cost Factors for a "Made-in-India" Rafale F4​

Establishing Rafale F4 production in India, likely involving Dassault and an Indian partner such as Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) or the existing Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited (DRAL) venture, would face several unique cost dynamics:
  1. Economies of Scale: The UAE's 80-aircraft order allows for cost efficiencies through large-scale production. India would need a similarly substantial order, potentially the 114 jets envisioned for the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) requirement or the recently discussed additional 40 jets for the IAF, to achieve comparable per-unit pricing. Recent reports suggest India might pursue a Government-to-Government deal for these additional Rafales, potentially streamlining the process but still requiring significant volume for cost benefits in local production.
  2. Local Manufacturing Savings: Domestic production offers potential savings on labour and facility costs compared to France. HAL's past experience with licensed production (like the Su-30 MKI) suggests assembly and integration savings could reach 10-20%. However, critical high-technology components, particularly engines (which can account for 30-40% of a jet's cost), advanced avionics, and radar systems, would likely still be imported initially, limiting overall savings to perhaps 15-25% compared to French manufacturing.
  3. Technology Transfer and Setup Costs: Unlike the UAE deal, India would mandate extensive technology transfer for local production, a key point in past negotiations like the original MMRCA competition. Establishing a dedicated production line, training specialised personnel, and covering licensing fees represent significant upfront investments, estimated at $2-3 billion. Amortized over a hypothetical 100-jet run, this adds approximately $20-30 million to each aircraft's cost. Dassault has previously indicated a minimum order of 100 units would be necessary to justify setting up a full assembly line in India, potentially through an expanded DRAL facility, over which it might seek full control to ensure quality standards, recalling past disagreements during MMRCA talks regarding HAL's production.
  4. India-Specific Enhancements (ISE): India's initial 36 Rafales included around $2 billion worth of specific modifications (like Israeli helmet displays). A future Indian Rafale F4 would almost certainly require further customisation, such as integrating indigenous systems like the Astra missile or adapting to unique IAF/Navy operational doctrines. These enhancements could add another $15-20 million per aircraft.
  5. Offset Obligations: India's defence procurement policies typically mandate significant reinvestment (offsets) into the local defence industry, often 30-50% of the contract value for competitive bids, although rules differ for G2G deals. While fostering domestic industry, meeting these obligations can inflate the prime contractor's costs as they establish local partnerships and supply chains. For a deal mirroring the UAE's value, this could imply $5.4-9 billion in offset commitments, potentially adding around 10% to the overall cost structure as Dassault integrates Indian partners like L&T, Mahindra, Kalyani Group, and Godrej & Boyce further into the supply chain. However, the effectiveness of offsets in transferring high-end technology versus simple buy-backs remains a point of discussion.

Estimated Cost Scenario​

Based on these factors and using the adjusted UAE flyaway cost as a starting point, a tentative cost structure for 100 "Made-in-India" Rafale F4 jets could look like this:
  • Base Flyaway Cost: $140 million/jet × 100 = $14 billion
  • Technology Transfer/Setup: $2.5 billion (or $25 million/jet)
  • India-Specific Enhancements: $1.5 billion (or $15 million/jet)
  • Offset-Related Cost Inflation (est. 10%): $1.4 billion
  • Support & Logistics (est. 20% of airframe cost): $3 billion
This rough estimate places the total program cost around $22.4 billion, translating to approximately $224 million per aircraft, including support but reflecting the heavy initial investment in local production capabilities. This figure is within the broad $15-40 billion range sometimes cited for the MRFA program, though those figures often encompass wider lifecycle costs.

While potentially higher per unit initially than a direct import (like the 2016 deal's inflation-adjusted $122 million flyaway cost), the strategic goal involves building long-term industrial capability alongside acquiring the aircraft.

Ultimately, while local labour offers savings, the substantial costs associated with technology transfer, establishing production infrastructure, meeting offset requirements, and incorporating specific enhancements mean that a "Made-in-India" Rafale F4 might only become significantly cost-competitive with direct imports if production volumes are very large, potentially including export orders facilitated by a robust indigenous supply chain.
 
UAE being size of Goa has purchased 80 Rafael, we purchased only 36 at the cost of 80 and now talk economic is defence procurement,this is a joke only one shopkeeper can tell other of how to buy costly item , spending twice the money , yet show all how good deal it is.
 
UAE being size of Goa has purchased 80 Rafael, we purchased only 36 at the cost of 80 and now talk economic is defence procurement,this is a joke only one shopkeeper can tell other of how to buy costly item , spending twice the money , yet show all how good deal it is.
Just make your own. Thats only way out. Till you buy from outside it will always workout cheaper to buy fully from outside on paper.
 
There is another aspect to this : delivery schedule. Rafale order book had crossed 230 as of December 2024. This is likely to exceed 299 as on date.

At the present rate of production (21 per year), it would take 14 years to clear the backlog order, i.e., excluding IAF's proposed order. Even if they hike their production rate to 30 per year as per their plan, our turn would come only after 10 years!

In case of production in India, assuming a gestation period of 24 months, we may get deliveries after 30 months onwards. This, in my view, is a significant advantage for our IAF.
 
Rafale is a nice aircraft but the timelines matter. If Dassault promises to deliver Rafales after 2035, it makes no sense. Although it would a capability boost. If Dassault promises to deliver all of them before 2035, it can make sense.
 
Indian defence deals take so long time that years and decades go by. If you go so late the deal is going to be costlier. Is RAFALE A 5TH GEN FIGHTER PLANE
IF YES THAN WHY DELAYING. GO FOR FEW sqardens. IF YOU CAN WAIT FOR AMCA THEN ITS OK. CHINA IS NOT GOING TO WAIT FOR YOUR FIFTH GEN FIGHTER. SO TAKE YOUR DECISION FASTLY
AFTER ALL YOU HAVE GOOD MONEY IN YOUR POCKET.
 
Rafale, Cost of Munition & support packages accounts for 30% to 40%, comedian Jokers should take note of this who say 30 Bn for MRFA second, After Technical evaluation, only the fate of Fighter jet will be decided, with entry of Su-57, One who starts local assembly with Ecosystem plus Autonomy in integration of sensors & weapons will win the contest apart from meeting parameters, so competition is wide open, Plain vanilla cost of Rafale with economies of scale will be less, with Meteor & Scalp local production if Dassault agrees. India-specific enhancements are one-time cost. At last Bharat will get the Best deal under MRFA, whoever wins.
 
Author is suggesting that local assembly would cost less than France forgetting that Su30MKI costed double in India and during MMRFA negotiation HAL quoted 2.7x manhours compared to French worker. If this jet is going to be manufactured by HAL then it will easily cross $300 million per unit.

In any case, government should only go ahead if it can support other projects and not impact them financially due to MRCA, That means we need 60 Squadron as per parliamentary committee by 2047, that means 600-700 extra jets after MRCA and Tejas Mk1.

India should strictly stick with budget and just get MRCA for numbers if it's going to be 4th gen platform. Whether it's Rafale or Gripen or F16 it won't matter against 5th generation fighters.
 
Author is suggesting that local assembly would cost less than France forgetting that Su30MKI costed double in India and during MMRFA negotiation HAL quoted 2.7x manhours compared to French worker. If this jet is going to be manufactured by HAL then it will easily cross $300 million per unit.

In any case, government should only go ahead if it can support other projects and not impact them financially due to MRCA, That means we need 60 Squadron as per parliamentary committee by 2047, that means 600-700 extra jets after MRCA and Tejas Mk1.

India should strictly stick with budget and just get MRCA for numbers if it's going to be 4th gen platform. Whether it's Rafale or Gripen or F16 it won't matter against 5th generation fighters.
There is only one caveat. Any local manufacturing would be now done by Dassault directly which is about to acquire the Reliance stake in DRL venture and thus Dassault itself would be responsible for building it. As such HAL is excluded from the picture.
 
There is only one caveat. Any local manufacturing would be now done by Dassault directly which is about to acquire the Reliance stake in DRL venture and thus Dassault itself would be responsible for building it. As such HAL is excluded from the picture.
I don't know how that is in any way better than HAL case. Maybe it will cost less but what would we gain apart from local employment. French deliberately go back on their commitment of ToT, as was in case of Scorpene. We need a serious local partner in the assembly line, be it L&T, Tata, or Adani.
 
Media's write up for general audience's informative looks very impressive and convincing but how effectively is the GoI seriously going to move forward to acquire MRFA procurement is yet to be seen. Just like decisions on every project it is not uncommon the final deal drags on and on for far too long to point of time we eventually missed the competitive edge of the technology where china leap frogs to much advanced technologies. For example the foreign partners in collaboration to produce 110kN advanced technology engine has been making news for the last one year. There was a news that a successful candidate will be announced and deal signed during Aero India 2025. Nothing happened during Aero India and just that same news is making rounds with any progress on the project. India made a blunder without adequate R&D facilities to support advanced technology inputs to local military industries like HAL. India started with a fighter aircraft project without an Indian made engines. Kaveri engine was a disaster without much progress in achieving advanced technology second-generation single crystal blades (CMSX-4). These blades operate at 1080°C, and when combined with thermal barrier coatings and advanced cooling hole designs. It's time India change it's mindset to take proactive measures to collaborate with foreign partners to obtain valuable knowledge in advanced technologies. Don't sit on crucial deals to delay in crucial decision making. I really wonder how is this deal going to come through. India has to be practical in its request for local manufacture of Rafael F4 with mere 40 aircrafts. How is 40 aircrafts is going to solve the critically reduced fighter squadrons to 31?
 
IAF is in a total mess. It needs 30 fighter jets every year. Starting from next year. How will it get 30 jets every year from 2026 onwards is a big question. Your target is to immediately get 150 fighter jets in the next 5 years (2025-2030)

Any new deal will take 6 months to 1 year for finalization. And another 4 years to start delivery. So a total of 5 years to get the first delivery for a new deal. In this 5 year gap (2025-2030), how to produce 30 jets per year. IAF quickly decide and take fast decisions. Note that MIRAGE-2000, Jaguars, MIG-29 are becoming very old (I hope they are maintained well). Also, note that there were two crashes of Jaguars recently.
 
This calculation is totally wrong, if anything we need to use as a base, we need to start from the price charged for Rafale-M F3R, $277Mln/Rafale-M, add another $30Mln for F4 upgrade and $20Mln for India specific upgrade, to make in In India it will cost $10Mln-$20Mln more, so the final cost for each Rafale F4 made in India would be around $350Mln/ each give or take, for 110 jets it will cost $40Bln ++, which is a criminal waste of tax payer's money for a 4th gen jet when we have a comparable domestically made jet.
 
India doesn't need Rafale, if IAF was serious about it they would have signed the deal in 2016 for larger numbers. Its already too late & beyond fiscal logic. Just focus on Tejas Mark 2 & AMCA programs.
 
Rajnath has fked this up. The MRFA requirement file has been on his desk since the day he took over as DefMin. At that time Rafale had almost no orders and we would have been able to negotiate a very favourable deal. But now, deliveries are Ram bharose. IAF is no less a culprit. The Air Chiefs should have pressed harder and maybe resigned from their position stating their inability to do their job effectively without adequate weaponry. The whole system is a fkin mess with no accountability. Modi needs to replace Rajnath with a younger, more capable minister like Parrikar.
 
I don't know how that is in any way better than HAL case. Maybe it will cost less but what would we gain apart from local employment. French deliberately go back on their commitment of ToT, as was in case of Scorpene. We need a serious local partner in the assembly line, be it L&T, Tata, or Adani.
The problem is there is no such thing as a full ToT. ToT contracts inherently are designed with limited transfer of knowhow and as such even if we choose a different local partner the net transfer of technology is unlikely to be of any significance.

No OEM will hand over their proprietary knowledge for manufacturing, treating and processing mission critical components or equipment and they would almost always remain restricted. In such a scenario it may not be all that bad for Dassault to take full control of DRL and set up a fully owned assembly line. There will invariably have to sub contract most of the aero structures, fuselage and may be even, hydraulics, power relays, electronics, to local industry which would increase competency of Indian aerospace vendor eco system. If it sufficiently develops our industry could also support other 6 generation fighter programs like GCAP, FCAS in future.
 
There are two major economies which have really not fought any major wars for the past 30 years. One is India. And the other is China. On one hand China produces 30 to 50 fighter jets per year. On the other hand India's production is insignificant.

China has Global tension. India doesn't seem to have any tension.
 
India doesn't need Rafale, if IAF was serious about it they would have signed the deal in 2016 for larger numbers. Its already too late & beyond fiscal logic. Just focus on Tejas Mark 2 & AMCA programs.
But the way it's going... UAE needs to buy these 4th Gen... 80 of these birds for $18 Billion++; as we know, there is a local agent, local sponsor who is related to or best buddy of top honchos in govt. at least minimum of a Billion dollars in sales commissions etc. will be skimmed... Great. so, then another Billionaire gets born; Yes, we know the French and how they do global business;
 
UAE being size of Goa has purchased 80 Rafael, we purchased only 36 at the cost of 80 and now talk economic is defence procurement,this is a joke only one shopkeeper can tell other of how to buy costly item , spending twice the money , yet show all how good deal it is.
Buddy..Loads of extra goodies are included. Way more than UAE
 
Please for God’s sake don’t waste billions for a 4th gen jet
Actually, Rafale F3 that IAF operates is 4.5 gen jet. The next batch will be F4 which will be 4.5++ gen jet and the last batch will be 4.5++ gen jet which will be same as any stealth jet in capability except stealth meaning -5 gen jet.
 
Keep calm and trust on our domestic jets. Yes, HAL needs a good rap and revamp but India should have faith in its MK1a , MK2 and AMCA. TEDBF seems totally waste of money especially when we have AMCA.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,644
Messages
49,698
Members
3,123
Latest member
Bullet
Back
Top