Analysis How Tejas Mk2 Could Have Restored IAF Squadron More Effectively Than Costly Rafale under MRFA

How Tejas Mk2 Could Have Restored IAF Squadron More Effectively Than Costly Rafale under MRFA


The Indian Air Force (IAF) is facing a critical challenge with its fighter squadron strength dwindling to 31, significantly below the sanctioned number of 42.

To address this gap, India is pursuing the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program to acquire 114 new jets.

However, with the total cost estimated at a staggering ₹2,00,000 crore ($24.5 billion), a serious debate has emerged within India's defence circles about the country's procurement strategy and the high price of leading foreign contenders like the Dassault Rafale.

A central point of discussion is whether a more focused and timely development of the indigenous Tejas Mk2 fighter could have offered a more practical and economically sound solution.

Experts suggest that had the Tejas Mk2 program avoided multiple delays and redesigns, it could have provided the IAF with a larger fleet of capable aircraft for the same budget, bolstering national security and the domestic defence industry simultaneously.

The Escalating Cost of Foreign Acquisitions​

The MRFA initiative, which evolved from the original Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender of 2007, has seen its costs skyrocket. The initial plan was to buy 126 jets for approximately ₹42,000 crore ($10.4 billion). Today, the estimated cost for 114 aircraft is nearly $24.5 billion.

The Rafale, a proven 4.5-generation fighter, is a top contender, but its high price is a major concern. If manufactured in India under the "Make in India" policy, each Rafale is projected to cost over $150 million.

This comprehensive price includes not just the aircraft but also the transfer of technology, weaponry, crew training, and long-term maintenance, placing a substantial financial burden on the nation.

In sharp contrast, the domestically developed Tejas Mk2, a 4.5-generation multi-role fighter from the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), has an estimated unit cost of $70-80 million.

This significant price difference means India could theoretically purchase two Tejas Mk2 aircraft for the price of a single Rafale. This cost-effectiveness is the foundation of the argument that the Tejas Mk2 could have been a superior alternative for rebuilding the IAF's fleet.

For the ₹2,00,000 crore allocated for 114 foreign jets (forming about six squadrons), India could have procured approximately 250 Tejas Mk2s, which would create 12 to 13 squadrons.

Such a move would not only meet the IAF's sanctioned strength of 42 squadrons but also provide a surplus to manage future challenges.

A Story of Delays and Evolving Ambitions​

The Tejas Mk2 was initially planned as a straightforward upgrade to the existing Tejas Mk1 Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).

However, the program's timeline has been significantly extended due to shifting requirements from the IAF and several major redesigns. These changes transformed the aircraft from a simple update into a much larger, 17.5-ton medium-weight fighter.

While this evolution has made the Mk2 more powerful—equipped with the advanced American GE F414 engine, a modern AESA radar, and a higher weapon payload—it has pushed its first flight to around 2027, with squadron service unlikely before the early 2030s.

Critics argue that with better foresight and stable requirements in the early 2000s, a mature Tejas Mk2 could already be in service today.

The government's Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) officially sanctioned the Tejas Mk2 project in September 2022, but many believe this crucial step could have been taken much earlier, potentially saving billions and accelerating the IAF's modernization.

The Strategic Imperative for Self-Reliance​

Opting for the Tejas Mk2 in greater numbers offers strategic advantages that go beyond simple cost and quantity.

Full ownership of an indigenous platform gives India complete control over its maintenance, upgrades, and weapon integration without relying on foreign approval.

This allows for the seamless addition of advanced Indian-made weapons like the Astra air-to-air missiles and the BrahMos-NG cruise missile, enhancing operational independence.

Furthermore, investing the massive MRFA budget into a domestic program would provide a major boost to India's goal of Atmanirbhar Bharat.

The funds would circulate within the national economy, supporting the defence-industrial base, creating skilled jobs, and fostering innovation.

This would strengthen the ecosystem for more ambitious future projects, such as the fifth-generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), for which the Tejas Mk2 can serve as a crucial technological stepping stone.

While the Rafale offers the immediate advantage of a battle-proven platform, the debate highlights the long-term strategic and economic benefits of prioritizing and efficiently managing indigenous defence programs.
 
Could have , would have what not , move on as all know this major task of jet business is not catching up .
 
Combat radius and twin engine machine, payload carrying capacity matters. Sensors too. Need both types, Tejas MK2 as well as Rafale. Despite this, Tejas MK2 has potential of 250 plus units in IAF fleet.
 
Instead of pondering over what could have been just focus on the current situation. Even if sanctioned today the Tejas mk2 will take around 10 years to begin induction and another 10 to be fully inducted in numbers if there are no delays. Instead it will take 5-10 years to induct Rafale or SU-57 if contract is signed now. We will anyways require Tejas mk2 to fill up the required numbers along with AMCA and Tejas mk1 variants.
 
A forgien fighter jet is need of the hour, Rafle is best bet to continue our relations normally with west for economic prosperity, Tejas Mk II is not ready for 5 years from now and its future is not certain like MK1 so if IAF bought 114 fighter from outside there is still room for 200 tejas mk II
 
Tejas Mark 2 and TEDBF should be focused on rather than Rafale. Maybe another 36 is good enough, that too F5 variant.
 
India was originally relying on HAL to complete developing the Tejas MK2 jet and production would have started but constant delays have hampered the development timeline. Also the delays in delivering the Tejas MK1A jets has been a problem as by now they should have started to replace the retiring Mig 21 jets.

India has to forget the MRFA completely as it’s too expensive and we don’t get enough of the technology or indigenous content that we want. We have to focus on manufacturing more Tejas jets and in a larger quantity to make up for the long delays.
 
I think we go for newly su 57 m1 now its update al 51 f engine and new avonices and feature updated helmet mountain display which is very superior to rafale means very advance and low cost to compared to rafale and also rafale is expensive and restricted upgrade and expensive upgrade need permission of france which is nato member in any time also us join that which are negative impact of iaf and due to pressure policts in case of war but other side we have excellent relationship with Russia and we easy to maintain and upgrade with our terms like drdo and other our defence system and also russia is easily available to upgrade and update help us during war which france not help not help in war also russia give some our help during war and trusted friend and arm supplier so we go through su 57 m1 due to overall excellent performance and excellent for iaf also we familiar with su 30 mki also we bear low cost of maintenance and upgrade so better to go with su 57 m1 for decreased iaf fleet
 
An article which makes no sense at all ! Comparing a non existent jet which even has no assurance when it will first fly or be certified and produced in numbers with a fully battle proven jet with reasonable assurance of timely deliveries is foolish to say the least.
 
India must buy 1000 Empty Mig 35 with Soloviev D30 F6M Engines of Mig 31 for 200 Crore per plane alongwith 400 Empty Su 57M1 planes with idzeliye 30 or AL51F1 Engines for 400 Crores per plane with price includes 5 out of 6 side looking Radars. So 1400 Empty planes will cost 3.6 Lac Crore. After incorporating Indo Israeli avionics and Indian armaments the total expenditure for 1400 planes will be 6.00 lac crore or 429 Crore per Hyper plane. Each Soloviev D30 F6M Engine gives 93 KN Dry and 152 KN Wet Thrust.
 
Last edited:
An article which makes no sense at all ! Comparing a non existent jet which even has no assurance when it will first fly or be certified and produced in numbers with a fully battle proven jet with reasonable assurance of timely deliveries is foolish to say the least.
So true. Tejas MKII is not ready yet and might be at best only equal to Rafale and will be 4.5 generation in next 5-10 years. and thus, India is far behind and the only way to catch up in the international fighter jet technology is to build Rafales in India with 60-100% indigenization, as India could then be in the game for building its own future 6th generation aircrafts which USA, UK-Japan joint venture project, and other western countries including China are working upon.
 
India must buy 1000 Empty Mig 35 with Soloviev D30 F6M Engines of Mig 31 for 200 Crore per plane alongwith 400 Empty Su 57M1 planes with idzeliye 30 or AL51F1 Engines for 400 Crores with price includes 5 out of 6 side looking Radars. Empty planes will cost 3.6 Lac Crore. After incorporating Indo Israeli avionics and Indian armaments the total expenditure will be 6.00 lac crore 429 Crore per Hyper plane.
Excellent proposal, except for the Israeli part. We use 100% made in Bharat avionics. It is unwise to trust western powers n their allies in issues related to the Nations security. Jai Hind!
 
So true. Tejas MKII is not ready yet and might be at best only equal to Rafale and will be 4.5 generation in next 5-10 years. and thus, India is far behind and the only way to catch up in the international fighter jet technology is to build Rafales in India with 60-100% indigenization, as India could then be in the game for building its own future 6th generation aircrafts which USA, UK-Japan joint venture project, and other western countries including China are working upon.
Western technology is not of much use as is evident from the performance of Rafale in the recent operation. Another glaring example is the F35 which made an emergency landing in Kerala. It took all the might of UK AF and the and manufacturer with plane loads of equipment flown in, 35 days. To get that.masterpiece of western Technological wonder back into the air. Sich tech will be disastrous in war time. We need robust aircrafts that take hits and still bring back our pilots. Not some high tech delicate show pieces which are also expensive. Jai Hind.
 
By 2035, we will have super sukhoi 30mki, Su 57, rafale f5, tejas mk1a, mk2, amca - possibly.

Su57 was not ready 5 years back. The current stock of 36 rafales makes sense.

Going ahead with 114 f4.1 or f5 rafales is questionable when a complete comprehensive comparison and evaluation between Su57 and rafale f5 is not done.

120kn non VCA safran engine doesn't make sense when a similar al51f can be had for much cheaper and much quicker which could be used on tejas mk2, su30 and su57

And supporting kaveri after burner for mk1a would have been the sensible choice with f404 being the stop gap.

We need VCA 6th gen tech but not immediately for amca.
 
IAF is the main culprit. They are the main reason for the depletion of squadrons. No technology evolve fully from the first product. IAF wants everything too perfect and they change their requirements too often. Rather than procuring one squadron of tejas batch, run it, experience it and then seek improvements over it, and then move on to MK1, 1A, 2A etc will allow to incorporate latest design and technologies step by step on every scale-up. This would have made us to run MK1A flying now!
 
I think we go for newly su 57 m1 now its update al 51 f engine and new avonices and feature updated helmet mountain display which is very superior to rafale means very advance and low cost to compared to rafale and also rafale is expensive and restricted upgrade and expensive upgrade need permission of france which is nato member in any time also us join that which are negative impact of iaf and due to pressure policts in case of war but other side we have excellent relationship with Russia and we easy to maintain and upgrade with our terms like drdo and other our defence system and also russia is easily available to upgrade and update help us during war which france not help not help in war also russia give some our help during war and trusted friend and arm supplier so we go through su 57 m1 due to overall excellent performance and excellent for iaf also we familiar with su 30 mki also we bear low cost of maintenance and upgrade so better to go with su 57 m1 for decreased iaf fleet
Su57 is literally the best 5th gen in the market right now.
 
Could have , would have what not , move on as all know this major task of jet business is not catching up .
Unless defense planning approvals financial powers are not removed from the hands of general list IAS officers of MOD , Mod Finance , CGDA Indian defense procurement will remain distorted and result in sub optimum acquisitions at many times the cost and on verge of being outdated by the time they are inducted . Equipment selection must be by professional procurement boards consisting of service specialists , retd international bankers defense Chartered accountants , Contract Lawyers , professional Ceos of equipment production companies , DRDO specialist engineers , with no place for one exam pass officers in history veteran Ian science Islamic studies , Sanskrit and other subjects with little or no domain knowledge and frequent transfers to coal , animal husbandry , khadhi gram , and other ministries .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,666
Messages
59,192
Members
4,261
Latest member
nikhil Thakur
Back
Top