How Tejas Mk2 Fighter Program Prioritizing Streamlined Manufacturing and Reduced Operational Costs Through Advanced Engineering

How Tejas Mk2 Fighter Program Prioritizing Streamlined Manufacturing and Reduced Operational Costs Through Advanced Engineering


India's forthcoming Tejas Mk2 fighter jet, a significantly upgraded version of the indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), is being developed with a strong emphasis on efficient manufacturing and reduced operational costs.

The project leverages advanced engineering principles to ensure both high performance and affordability, a critical balance for the Indian Air Force (IAF).

The Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), the design agency behind the Mk2, is incorporating several key design philosophies. These include Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA), Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T), and Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis.

These methods ensure that the aircraft's components are designed for easy assembly, precise dimensions, and high interchangeability, streamlining the production process and reducing errors.

These design choices, coupled with a modular construction approach and Model-Based Design (MBD), are projected to significantly decrease the aircraft's production time and overall operating expenses. The Mk2 is slated for induction into the IAF in the early 2030s, and is positioned as a cost-effective, yet powerful, addition to India's air defence capabilities.

The Tejas Mk2, classified as a medium-weight, 4.5-generation fighter, represents a substantial improvement over the earlier Tejas Mk1A. It features a larger airframe, an increased payload capacity of 6.5 tons, and a more powerful GE F414 engine, providing 98 kN of thrust.

The IAF plans to acquire 120 Mk2 aircraft, helping to address a projected shortfall of 200 jets as part of a larger requirement for 450 aircraft by 2040.

The Mk2's design prioritizes not only combat capabilities but also lifecycle cost-efficiency, a crucial consideration given India's focus on indigenous defense production under the "Atmanirbhar Bharat" initiative.

DFMA principles ensure that the Mk2's parts are optimized for efficient assembly and manufacturing, leading to lower production costs and faster build times.

The use of GD&T and Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis guarantees precise dimensional control, enabling the seamless interchangeability of parts. This simplifies maintenance and enhances the scalability of production.

An ADA engineer highlighted that the aircraft's internal layout has been specifically arranged for easy maintenance and access to Line Replaceable Units (LRUs), such as avionics and hydraulics systems. This design minimizes downtime by allowing technicians to quickly replace these crucial components.

Furthermore, the adoption of modular design and MBD contributes to increased efficiency. By constructing the aircraft from standardized modules, assembly becomes faster and more streamlined.

MBD, a digital approach that utilizes 3D models instead of traditional blueprints, accelerates the transition from design to production. The ADA engineer stated that these concepts have demonstrably reduced the aircraft's cycle time, resulting in lower effective operating costs.

For the IAF, which operates a diverse range of aircraft, this translates to increased operational readiness and lower expenses per flight hour compared to older platforms like the Mirage 2000 or Jaguar.

The overall cost of a weapons platform depends on three main factors: development, manufacturing, and operational expenses. The ADA engineer emphasized that the Mk2 program builds upon the experience gained from the successful Tejas Mk1 and Mk1A programs, both of which have been inducted into IAF service.

Because the ADA and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) have already developed and refined many of the core technologies for the earlier Tejas variants, the Mk2 can leverage these proven systems, minimizing development costs. These include the Uttam Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, fly-by-wire controls, and composite materials, all of which have been matured over two decades.

Manufacturing costs are also optimized by utilizing HAL's existing Tejas production line in Bengaluru. This facility is being expanded to produce 24 Mk1A jets annually by 2028. The Mk2 shares significant commonality (60-70%) with the Mk1A, allowing for economies of scale. DFMA principles and modular construction further contribute to a lean manufacturing process.

Operational costs, which typically constitute the largest portion of an aircraft's lifecycle expenses, are reduced through the Mk2's maintenance-friendly design and the use of indigenous components, minimizing dependence on expensive foreign spare parts.

The ADA engineer asserted that, with the available expertise, it's possible to minimize both development and maintenance costs, resulting in a lifecycle cost significantly lower than imported alternatives, such as the Rafale (estimated at $200 million per unit) or the F-16.

Beyond cost savings, the Mk2's design is focused on operational readiness. With a planned first flight in 2026 and production starting around 2030, the Mk2 is intended to replace retiring MiG-29 and Jaguar aircraft. It will offer a range of 2,000 km, advanced avionics, and compatibility with weapons like the BrahMos-NG supersonic cruise missile.

The projected low operating cost of approximately $25,000 per flight hour (compared to around $40,000 for the Su-30 MKI, according to open-source estimates) will free up resources for the IAF's other procurement priorities, including the 114-jet Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) tender and the development of the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) stealth fighter. This demonstrates a strategic allocation of resources, maximizing both capability and fiscal responsibility.
 
I wonder if this will not be a dead-on-arrival aircraft.

A 4.5-gen airplane that isn't going to be mass-produced till 2035-40 odd, when 5th-gen is already matured as of 2025 with the F-22, F-35, SU-57, J-20, and J-35! In another 10-15 years, 5th-gen would have become the de facto standard, with 6th-gen coming in. The Mirage 2000 is already being phased out by France today, and this aircraft is a Mirage 2000-class fighter, best-case!!!

How is that going to work out for the IAF, bringing .303 rifles to an automatic gun fight?
 
It will be humbling for HAL, putting aside its ego and going to any established aerospace company like SAAB, BAE, L&M, or Dassault, and learning how they manufacture fighters, under a consultancy deal.
Civil servants don't know what humbling is they're always in dreamland.
 
We are aware of what this jet needs, what technology is needed but now they need to start manufacturing these jets on a large scale and quickly.

They need to let the private sector manufacture these jets entirely and not just provide parts and components. Let HAL and the private sector manufacture these jets but at the same price or similar price. This will stop us from relying on HAL alone to manufacture these jets which can delay and derail the production quantity and schedule.
 
Where is the engine of the Tejas Mark 2? Still no agreement with GE. It does not seem a reality until we can find a new way of engine integration from any other country. Now HAL should talk to RR or Safran for the engine of the Tejas MK2, as the plane is still in the development phase and we could easily integrate a new engine with required modifications. This is the era of supercomputers, and we could easily integrate the new engine in a short span of time. Just a clear vision and dedication are required. If GE fails the March/April deadline, we do not have any other option other than to choose an alternative engine partner. GE is only giving tarikh pe tarikh.
 
Reminder -

Price of 26 Rafale: ₹60,000 crore
Price of 97 Tejas: ₹60,000 crore
Cancel MRFA.
114 Rafale would cost 30 billion.
We can order 400 Tejas Mk2 in this price.
Let the production be 50:50 between HAL and a private company.
HAL producing 20 jets per year;Private company: 20 jets per year.
Total: 40 jets per year. Delivery complete in 10 years.
Rafale will also take 10 years to complete the 114 order.
Are you confident HAL can manufacture 20 jets per year, and are you confident the US will supply that many engines to India or use it as leverage against us? Let's say the US doesn't; then do you have faith that the Kaveri program will be successful in at least 8 years to have an alternative? Isn't this why we are diversifying our sources of purchase in the first place?
 
Another drama by US deep corporate forces in pushing India to go for another aircraft, using another US engine, to delay aircraft availability to the IAF for a few years more, and wasting Indian tax money with these continued delay tactics to make India weaker and weaker.

Until and unless hundreds of engines (at least 500) are supplied in bulk, no aircraft based upon a US engine should be initiated by India.

Because the US is not reliable in supplying engines to India.
 
Are you confident HAL can manufacture 20 jets per year, and are you confident the US will supply that many engines to India or use it as leverage against us? Let's say the US doesn't; then do you have faith that the Kaveri program will be successful in at least 8 years to have an alternative? Isn't this why we are diversifying our sources of purchase in the first place?
F414 will be made in India
 
F414 will be made in India
Sorry, I mixed up Mk1A with Mk2, where actually Mk1A seems more feasible. I am just looking at this practically and not trying to bring my country down, so here it goes. For what you said, Mk2 has to clear all trials and certification, and that may take another five years (remember, this is HAL!). In the meanwhile, let us hope that the US doesn't cause any issues in ToT. Also, we have about 170 Mk1A jets which need to be delivered. Give a few more years for Mk2 FOC certification and then production. So, we are talking about 400 Mk2s, according to you, in 15 years, which is 2040. By then, the AMCA production lines also have to be operational, or in the process of being so, as well as the TEDBF lines. Seems like a long shot and a fairy tale, given HAL's record, even with private sector support.
 
Sorry, I mixed up Mk1A with Mk2, where actually Mk1A seems more feasible. I am just looking at this practically and not trying to bring my country down, so here it goes. For what you said, Mk2 has to clear all trials and certification, and that may take another five years (remember, this is HAL!). In the meanwhile, let us hope that the US doesn't cause any issues in ToT. Also, we have about 170 Mk1A jets which need to be delivered. Give a few more years for Mk2 FOC certification and then production. So, we are talking about 400 Mk2s, according to you, in 15 years, which is 2040. By then, the AMCA production lines also have to be operational, or in the process of being so, as well as the TEDBF lines. Seems like a long shot and a fairy tale, given HAL's record, even with private sector support.
Tejas Mk2 production should be 50:50 by HAL : private company.

HAL can produce 20 jets per year.

Private company can produce 20 jets per year.

400 delivery in 10 years.

Also, Mk2 won't take much time for testing bcz it's very similar to Tejas Mk1A.
 
We are aware of what this jet needs, what technology is needed but now they need to start manufacturing these jets on a large scale and quickly.

They need to let the private sector manufacture these jets entirely and not just provide parts and components. Let HAL and the private sector manufacture these jets but at the same price or similar price. This will stop us from relying on HAL alone to manufacture these jets which can delay and derail the production quantity and schedule.
Well said. Sometimes delays can turn into blessings in disguise. Precautionary measures is what everybody here is jumping up and down about. What we also require is 100% partnerships. Many are lining up to be our partners, we seem to be evaluating all of them. Decisions have probably been made or are eminent. It will be a long hard road from there onwards. Whatever the conditions on that road we will muddle through learning along the way. My choice is Scandinavia it's far enough different enough to not get muddied in our rivers. It will be like having the moon as our partner. We are suraj and our chand can reflect our image.
 
He is actually crazy, no kidding. Don't call him Frenchie, he would prove to you Rafale is better than Su-57 and F-35. 🤣🤣 Bro must be very mad at all the missiles DRDO is making nowadays. 🤣
Nope. I have openly said F35 is the best fighter in the world, based on performance.

As for missiles, I am indeed mad that DRDO is not making anything. Tell me, how many missiles made by DRDO in the last 5 years have been inducted?
 
Tejas MK1A is already flying, and Mk2 is happening too - serious Govt money committed. Get used to it. This Govt knows how to get the engines and tech from wherever it has to.

There is only a small window left of Western fighter jets. If the US decides against India, then so be it. It will be Russians again, even in MRFA. Truth is bitter, but Su57 is superior (technology, ToT level, cost, upfront and lifecycle cost) to most of the Western options. Only things better than Russian are indigenous options. Western fighter jets are really plan C. Western fighter jets are way too expensive, and we can only afford squadrons in low single digits. The bulk will be indigenous and, in the worst case, Russian. Let the US decide.
Tejas Mk1A not yet delivered and Mk2 is super delayed. GoI has finally woken up and is doing massive reforms.

The window for Russians is long closed. Truth is sweet that Su57 is the worst plane on offer and there is no ToT and the cost is super high. Only thing worse than Russian planes are HAL promises. Western planes are now Plan A, as they are super cheap and super capable and most importantly, available today.
 
Nope. I have openly said F35 is the best fighter in the world, based on performance.

As for missiles, I am indeed mad that DRDO is not making anything. Tell me, how many missiles made by DRDO in the last 5 years have been inducted?
Isn't induction a part of the IAF?

Which missile hasn't been inducted? Agni, Pralay, Shakti ASAT, Astra Mk1, Astra Mk2 (preliminary orders have been given)... Astra Mk3 and Rudram are under final trials. It takes time; it's not your Shaka Laka Boom Boom magic pencil.
 
Tejas Mk2 production should be 50:50 by HAL : private company.

HAL can produce 20 jets per year.

Private company can produce 20 jets per year.

400 delivery in 10 years.

Also, Mk2 won't take much time for testing bcz it's very similar to Tejas Mk1A.
You have a lot of faith in HAL, given their track record and the volume of work they currently have / ahead of them, even with private sector involvement. Hope your optimism turns out to be true. I am not so optimistic, but am pretty sure we will have a few new / rejuvenated squadrons with us in a decade's time.
 
Isn't induction a part of the IAF?

Which missile hasn't been inducted? Agni, Pralay, Shakti ASAT, Astra Mk1, Astra Mk2 (preliminary orders have been given)... Astra Mk3 and Rudram are under final trials. It takes time; it's not your Shaka Laka Boom Boom magic pencil.
I said "last 5 years" specifically. Now, coming to the names you mentioned:

Astra Mk1 was inducted well before 5 years, and it was late by over a decade.

Astra Mk3 is not under final trials. It has never been test-fired from a plane to date, in fact.

Astra Mk2 has not been given preliminary orders. The IAF has only started the procurement process, which is something that is started well before the missile passes the trials, or even starts the trials, in some cases.

Agni, again, is not in that 5-year timeframe, and it has been under trials/development for decades (depending on which variant you are talking about, of course). Same for ASAT.

So, that leaves only one ballistic missile. That, too, took a decade and is not yet inducted (orders placed).

I know it takes time, but at least something must be completed, right? And then you say I will be nervous looking at their development.
 
I said "last 5 years" specifically. Now, coming to the names you mentioned:

Astra Mk1 was inducted well before 5 years, and it was late by over a decade.

Astra Mk3 is not under final trials. It has never been test-fired from a plane to date, in fact.

Astra Mk2 has not been given preliminary orders. The IAF has only started the procurement process, which is something that is started well before the missile passes the trials, or even starts the trials, in some cases.

Agni, again, is not in that 5-year timeframe, and it has been under trials/development for decades (depending on which variant you are talking about, of course). Same for ASAT.

So, that leaves only one ballistic missile. That, too, took a decade and is not yet inducted (orders placed).

I know it takes time, but at least something must be completed, right? And then you say I will be nervous looking at their development.
And how many missiles were made, trialed, and inducted in this same 5-year period you mentioned across the globe? Did any US, Russian, or Chinese missile do all of it in 5 years? This is defense, not a joke. You have no clue about engineering and technology, I am sure.
 
We need our supervisors HAL. They will always be there representing our community. Suppliers and creators will need to be looked after, encouraged or supported. They are the nearest to ourselves checking offerings. But they should be called out for mucking things up till now. If they don't change others will get those positions.
 
And how many missiles were made, trialed, and inducted in this same 5-year period you mentioned across the globe? Did any US, Russian, or Chinese missile do all of it in 5 years? This is defense, not a joke. You have no clue about engineering and technology, I am sure.
How many of those missiles across the world took 2-3 decades? I am also sure that you have no idea about R&D. Also, I never said it should have done all that in 5 years. The point was to show how slow DRDO is going, as most of the missiles you mentioned were not inducted in 5 years and you could only name 1 which was.

And since you asked, the entire Iron Dome system was approved in 2007 and was operational in 2011. So that's less than 5 years, in fact. JATM took some 7 years.
 
I wonder if this will not be a dead-on-arrival aircraft.

A 4.5-gen airplane that isn't going to be mass-produced till 2035-40 odd, when 5th-gen is already matured as of 2025 with the F-22, F-35, SU-57, J-20, and J-35! In another 10-15 years, 5th-gen would have become the de facto standard, with 6th-gen coming in. The Mirage 2000 is already being phased out by France today, and this aircraft is a Mirage 2000-class fighter, best-case!!!

How is that going to work out for the IAF, bringing .303 rifles to an automatic gun fight?
I think, experienced manufacturing experts, process planners, product quality specialists must be involved during design phase to check the manufacturability and maintaining the quality . Retired reputed engineers who worked in the field of manufacturing, assembly, quality and maintenance in aerospace field should be recruited on contract basis and their sevices should be utilised during finalisation of design for manufacturing. It will reduce the time and cost of aircraft development and productioniisation. One more thing I want to add that the designers must use newly developed composite material (CFRP) and new composite part manufacturing technologies to optimise the weight and strength. Usually it is found that indian designers use the materials specifically CRPF and GRPF which were used in previous projects leading to no optimisation and utilisation of new and better materials and the processes. Also, LRUs should be well thought off engaging reputed manufacturers who have strong quality systems to avoid regular failure and shortages of LRUs faced by current projects. Trainings to Armed forces also be given during development phase itself to learn the technologies required during maintenance and repairs.
 
India needs to sign a deal for the GE F414 engine as soon as possible. But before that, the most important thing is to make the Tejas Mk2 a reality before it's too late — you have already lost many years on this.
I'm totally irritated by GRRE
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,203
Messages
45,911
Members
2,909
Latest member
ikamalverma
Back
Top