A recent report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) criticizing India's actions in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) has sparked controversy, with accusations that it aligns with Pakistan-sponsored propaganda.
While the report highlights alleged human rights abuses, it seemingly overlooks significant progress made in the region's security and development, largely due to India's efforts to combat Pakistan's proxy war.
Government's Efforts and Security Improvements
Union Home Minister Amit Shah has been actively addressing the security situation in J&K, particularly in light of recent terror incidents in Jammu. He has directed security agencies to adopt innovative strategies and replicate successful tactics from the Kashmir Valley to curb terrorism. These efforts have led to a significant decline in organized terrorist violence, transforming the conflict into a proxy war, as stated by Shah.Contrary to HRW's claims, there have been notable improvements in the law and order situation in Kashmir. Terror-related incidents have decreased, elections have seen high voter turnout, and tourism has flourished, indicating a more stable environment.
Addressing Claims of Restricted Freedoms
The HRW report alleges suppression of journalistic freedom but fails to acknowledge instances where individuals posing as journalists were involved in terrorism.The case of Adil Farooq Bhat, arrested for working as an overground worker for terrorists, raises questions about the validity of claims regarding press freedom restrictions.
Terrorism and the Proxy War Dynamic
The security challenges in J&K are largely a result of Pakistan's proxy war, coupled with local political issues.Despite setbacks, India's efforts to maintain peace and stability have gained momentum, while Pakistan continues its attempts to destabilize the region.
Recent terror attacks in Jammu have been met with swift responses from Indian security forces, demonstrating the government's commitment to protecting its citizens.
Journalists in a Warzone
The HRW report also touches upon the challenges faced by journalists in the region, including threats from both militant groups and authorities. However, it neglects the broader context of Pakistan's proxy war, which has directly targeted media professionals.Journalists in Kashmir operate in a dangerous environment, facing threats from groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and The Resistance Front (TRF). The publication of hit lists targeting journalists underscores the real dangers they face. In November 2022, such a list forced several journalists to quit their jobs.
Conclusion
While the HRW report raises concerns about human rights in J&K, it appears to be influenced by Pakistan-sponsored propaganda and fails to acknowledge the significant progress made by the Indian government in improving security and human rights in the region.The situation on the ground is more nuanced and positive than the report suggests, reflecting India's determination to safeguard its citizens and uphold fundamental freedoms.
