IAF Actively Explores Japan's Kawasaki C-2 Proposal for Next-gen Strategic Transport as Soviet-era IL-76s Near Retirement by 2030

IAF Actively Explores Japan's Kawasaki C-2 Proposal for Next-gen Strategic Transport as Soviet-era IL-76s Near Retirement by 2030


The Indian Air Force (IAF) is taking significant steps to modernise its transport aircraft fleet, with official sources confirming that India has requested a formal proposal from Japan for its Kawasaki C-2 military transport aircraft.

This development is a key part of the IAF's programme to find a successor for its aging Soviet-era Ilyushin IL-76 heavy-lift aircraft, which are anticipated to begin retirement by 2030.

The move also coincides with a broader reassessment of the IAF's Medium Transport Aircraft (MTA) requirements as it seeks to update its capabilities, which currently rely on the IL-76 and the Antonov An-32 aircraft.

The IAF's fleet modernisation is a multi-pronged effort. The locally manufactured Airbus C-295M aircraft are already slated to take over from the older Avro HS-748 fleet.

Now, the air force is considering how to best consolidate its tactical and strategic airlift capacities. This could involve using the C-295M to also replace the An-32 fleet, while a more robust platform like the Kawasaki C-2 is being evaluated to fulfil the strategic roles currently undertaken by the IL-76.

Strategic airlift capabilities are crucial for rapidly deploying troops, equipment, and humanitarian aid over long distances, forming a vital component of a nation's defence posture.

Developed by Kawasaki Aerospace for the Japan Air Self-Defence Force (JASDF), the Kawasaki C-2 is a modern, mid-size military transport aircraft engineered for long-distance and high-speed missions. It is powered by two General Electric CF6-80C2K turbofan engines.

The aircraft boasts a significant maximum payload capacity, reported between 36 and 37.6 tonnes, which is comparable to the 48-tonne capacity of the older IL-76MD variant currently operational with the IAF.

Key performance indicators for the C-2 include a top speed of 890 km/h, a flight range of 6,500 kilometres, and an operational service ceiling of 12,200 metres. These features provide versatility for a range of both tactical and strategic air transport duties.

Furthermore, its capability to operate from shorter or less prepared runways enhances its suitability for India’s diverse geographical and operational terrains.

Japan has been keen to find international buyers for its C-2 aircraft. According to IAF officials, the Japanese aircraft could potentially meet the force's operational needs at a more economical price point compared to other contenders, such as the Airbus A400M.

A significant advantage of the C-2 lies in its fuel-efficient CF6-80C2K engines, which offer better performance and lower running costs than the IL-76's older D-30KP engines.

These Soviet-era engines have been a factor in the IL-76's declining availability rates, which reportedly fell to as low as 32.16% over the last decade due to challenges in maintenance and obtaining spare parts following the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

This interest in Japanese hardware also reflects a wider trend among nations to diversify their sources of defence equipment.

Currently, the IAF's transport aircraft inventory includes over 100 An-32s, 14 operational IL-76s, 11 C-17 Globemaster III heavy lifters, 12 C-130J Super Hercules tactical transports, and 56 Avro HS-748s.

The Avro aircraft are being systematically replaced by the C-295M under a significant contract valued at ₹21,935-crore, signed in 2021 with Airbus Defence and Space.

The C-295M, which has a payload capacity of 9.5 tonnes, is primarily designed for tactical missions. Highlighting the "Make in India" initiative in defence, these aircraft are being assembled in Vadodara by Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL), with the first indigenously assembled unit anticipated by September 2026.

Sources indicate that the IAF now views the C-295M as a suitable candidate to potentially replace the An-32 fleet as well, considering the An-32s' age—many have been in service since the 1980s—and their decreasing operational readiness.

Despite their advancing age, the IL-76 aircraft, which were inducted into the IAF between 1985 and 1989, continue to be vital assets for heavy-lift strategic airlift operations. The IAF is planning to phase out some of these aircraft starting in 2030, as they will have completed over 40 years of service, a common lifespan consideration for military transport aircraft.

In a move to maintain operational capability in the interim, the IAF approached Russia in March 2024 to explore the possibility of extending the technical service life of 11 IL-76MD aircraft.

However, the long-term strategy necessitates acquiring a modern replacement. The Kawasaki C-2's payload capacity, while marginally less than that of the IL-76MD, makes it a strong contender, particularly given its contemporary design, advanced avionics, and greater operational efficiency.

The IAF's original Medium Transport Aircraft (MTA) tender was aimed at procuring a platform in the 18-30 tonne payload category to replace both the An-32 and IL-76 fleets. This tender attracted interest from several global aerospace firms, including Lockheed Martin with its C-130J-30 Super Hercules, Embraer with the KC-390 Millennium, and Airbus with the A400M Atlas.

However, with a payload capacity of 37 tonnes, the A400M somewhat exceeds the initial MTA specifications, positioning it more as a direct successor for the IL-76's heavy-lift role. The Kawasaki C-2, offering a capacity of 36-37.6 tonnes, aligns more directly with the IL-76MD's capabilities and, according to IAF officials, presents a potential cost advantage over the A400M.

While the Airbus A400M is a highly capable aircraft, known for its versatility with an extended range of 8,900 km and the ability to transport heavy and outsized cargo, it generally comes with a higher acquisition and operational cost.

In contrast, the Kawasaki C-2's fuel-efficient engines and potentially lower purchase price make it an appealing option for the IAF, which is carefully balancing its modernisation goals with budgetary realities.

Japan's willingness to export the C-2 is also consistent with its evolving national defence policy, which now allows for broader defence equipment and technology transfers, as previously demonstrated in its marketing efforts for the aircraft to nations like Saudi Arabia.
 
Japan and US are united in their efforts to keep Pakistan alive by any mean. Only the body of C2 is Japani but it's heart (engine) is US. And US is not a reliable nation. They have a long history of abandoning their old friends And partners. Trump is an unstable loudmouth. He has already betrayed India, Pakistan, Ukraine and EU. His only interest is money for US. The moment your money is in house pocket, he turns his eye elsewhere.
 
US can't be trusted for long term partnership. Buying C2 means at least 40 years of dependence on Japan and US for spares and third and fourth line servicing. Technology transfer for engine will not happen. India need to work very hard on long term contract otherwise it will be same case as of SU 30. India paid all the development cost of SU 30 but its Russia which is reaping all the benefits.
 
Kawasaki C2 has a maximum pay load of 32ton and it perfectly meets Indian Airforce requirement of MTA.
Make it India and it improves regional defence coopration
 
For IL-76 replacement, we should just go with the newer IL-76, which has more payload capability than the current ones. All other aircraft available do not match the payload capability of even the current IL-76 with us. For MTA, KC-390 appears to be the ideal choice, though even C-2 would be good if we are looking for a heavier payload capability.
 
The Japanese Kawasaki C-2 is a fine aircraft and would make a decent one on one replacement for the baseline IL-76. The problem though is Japanese dont do competitive bidding, as their products are bound to be relatively expensive as compared to other offerings and typically favor direct purchases by one-on-one government to government deals.
 
I still think the Embraer offer of C-390 is more enticing and cost-effective over the long term due to it being operated by multiple nations. In all likelihood, it will offer a higher provision for ToT and local production than the export-weary Japanese can offer with K-2.

Besides, the last experience of negotiations with Japan for the US-2 aircraft was not encouraging, to say the least, with the deal being ultimately shelved.

Also, I don't know whether Japan can fulfill such a large export contract given their lack of experience in defence deals and bureaucracy due to their long pacifist policies, and they perhaps may have stringent end-user monitoring that comes with their gear (although it's unusual for a cargo aircraft).

PS - Great to see IAF finally seeing the daylight and replacing the An-32 fleet with the locally produced C-295 itself rather than hunting for another different cargo plane.
 
The C-2 was custom built for the Japanese defense forces after a thorough evaluation of the C-17 and the A400M. The C2 has the distinct advantage of being able to cruise at an optimum altitude used by conventional commercial cargo carriers with its high cruise speed of Mach 0.8+ and service ceiling of 45,000 feet, which is even better than the C-17. Slower turboprops and jets with lower cruise speeds are required to cruise at much lower altitudes which provides a distinct advantage to C2 over others. Further, the GE CF6 engines powering the C2 are one of the most reliable, fuel efficient and proven engines in the wide body AC segment since their EIS in the early 1970s. CF6s also power the USAF's latest KC-46A tankers which are replacing the old & venerable workhorses, the KC-135s. Further, the C2 is perfectly positioned right between the C-130J (at 18-20 tons) and the C-17 (70+ tons) and can be used for both.

IAF should adopt a tiered approach for its airlifter fleet starting out with the C-295 at the bottom followed by the KC-390 for tactical airlift; with its proven V2500 Jet engines and high subsonic cruise speed, being a clear advantage over the turboprops-powered C-130J; followed by the C2 in the middle and the existing C-17s at the very top.

Regards,

Rajat Narang

Researcher, Author & Historian

https://www.amazon.com/stores/Rajat-Narang/author/B08JGJTT6N

For a further deeper dig and a comparative SWOT between these platforms, the below book on Amazon is highly recommended:- Birds of Freight: World's Top Transport Aircraft Programs https://www.amazon.in/Birds-Freight-AirLifters-Transport-Heavyweights-ebook/dp/B09JCJF1T6
 
Please IAF do not loose time. Evaluate them and make the deal. If the aircraft is what our defense requirements are then just buy it. Japanese are honest and competent technical country. They have long association with US fire power.
 
India needs to replace the IL76 but the problem is that the western planes are too expensive and we will face resistance from the amount and type of critical technology we would want to receive along with how much we can manufacture with Indian raw materials.

India should just buy and manufacture the latest and most modern IL76 which can carry a large payload, its fuel efficient, has a low purchase cost, longer range, modern and better engines, latest avionics, glass cockpit and it has a high serviceability rate as it will use the latest technology and equipment. With this deal we can receive a good amount of the technology and get to manufacture it India. This can also educate India on how to develop such a plane and the technology needed.

The other alternative is to partner with a company to make a completely brand new transporter which will teach us how to design, develop and manufacture such a large plane 100% indigenously.
 
Why IAF is interested in a very costly platform? Brazilian KC390 meets all requirements, budget friendly and offers a local manufacturing with adequate TOT... with Mahindra as partner, KC390 deal will help our Aero ecosystem.
 
Form a JV company with Japan with shared IP and TOT for Kawasaki P-1 (which can be used for AWACS like Wedgetail configuration, SIGINT aircraft, maritime patrol aircraft with a single platform), Kawasaki C-2 which again can be converted for a refueller variant and the US-2. Japan has a program for civilian P-1 which again will be good for us. If they are not willing then go with a similar deal for Brazilian Embraer. Just give them TOT for Tejas, Akash and our frigate program instead of KC-390, Praetor 600, E-2 jet and ask for their assistance for Saras Mk2, Grob 180 and even a civilian variant of C-295. We can't just keep importing and assembling such jets which have equal importance to fighter jet programs. One or two platforms can really give us that indigenous capabilities which we lack and takes time to develop considering we can't even make a 19 seater Saras Mk2 despite assembling a similar German platform.
 
Is it possible that this response is maybe partially due to Japan reaching out to have India included in the GCAP program? The timing of the 2 is interesting.
 
How does 37 tonnes compare with 48 tonnes? That is an 11-tonne difference. The C-295 only carries 9 to 10 tonnes! That is a whole planeload! I wonder if the GoI is making these offers just to keep Japan engaged politically. It will be better for India to participate in the Tempest 6th-gen fighter jet program and forget all these side items. The current Japanese constitution still won't allow open military technology transfer to India.
 
It's better to buy the newer version of IL-76... Japan won't budge on giving ToTs easily, especially if we are not committing to buying around 50 to 100 PCs of C-2s, IMHO. If they give technology, maybe it's only around a solid 60%... More than that is a miracle.
 
Best option for India to buy Embraer C-390 with TOT which they are ready. They are eager to come here and it's a good aircraft on comparsion with Airbus C-395.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,022
Messages
51,432
Members
3,308
Latest member
sachin@1996
Back
Top