IAF May Seek 24 Aircraft Annual Production in 114-Jet MRFA Tender, But It Has Financial Implications for Vendor and MoD

MRFA-1.jpg


The Indian Air Force (IAF) is setting an ambitious pace for its Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program, aiming to procure 114 advanced fighter jets with a significantly higher production rate than initially anticipated.

Sources indicate that the IAF is pushing for the production of 24 aircraft per year, a substantial increase from the previously considered rate of 10-14 units annually. This accelerated timeline, while aimed at rapidly bolstering India's defence capabilities, is expected to increase costs for winning vendor and Ministry of Defence (MoD).

The MRFA program, a critical component of the IAF's modernization efforts, seeks to address operational demands and strengthen defenses across multiple fronts. By accelerating production to 24 jets annually, the IAF aims to quickly integrate these advanced aircraft into its fleet, enhancing its combat readiness.

However, this increased production rate comes with significant financial implications. To meet this demanding target, the winning vendor will need to establish a robust local production infrastructure, potentially requiring larger facilities, additional tooling, and a larger workforce.

These factors will translate into increased capital investment for the MoD. Furthermore, the need for technology transfer, workforce training, and supply chain scaling will add to the overall program cost.

The proposed production target also presents operational and logistical challenges. Foreign Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) will need to demonstrate the capacity to ramp up production to meet the IAF's requirements. This may prove challenging given India's current infrastructure and the need for seamless integration of the supply chain.

Maintaining stringent quality standards under an accelerated production timeline is crucial. Close coordination between the OEM and its Indian partners will be essential to ensure that quality is not compromised in the pursuit of rapid production.

Finally, the increased production rate could introduce additional regulatory hurdles, requiring close collaboration between Indian authorities and foreign partners to ensure compliance with defence manufacturing standards.

While the IAF's push for a higher production rate underscores the urgency of its modernization efforts, it also highlights the need for careful planning and execution to manage the associated costs and logistical challenges. The MRFA program remains a key focus for India's defence sector, and its outcome will significantly shape the IAF's capabilities in the coming decades.
 
LM says it is a new plane and not a variant of F16. So let’s go by what the manufacturer says, no? At least IAF will have to treat it as such and then only they can pass the judgement.

As for Rafale, what you think doesn’t matter. Dassault’s official statement says their target was 15 in 2023. They delivered 13. That’s written in their official year end report to the shareholders.

And if you are saying that let’s wait till the end of this year, shouldn’t that also be applicable to you? Or you wanna say that let’s criticize Dassault and talk about slow deliveries of Rafale till the end of this year but wait to say anything good while their CEO has said that they have ‘already’ reached the speed of 2 jets monthly?

Has GE’s CEO ever said they have delivered 2 engines to I dis per month and then it was found that they didn’t?
Well as you say their annual report say they just delivered 13 so actually missed it by 2 jets?? Right?? So they actually missed their own target set by them!!
I am saying they are able to manufacture only 7 jets upto Aug!! So basically I am referring here that it's not that easy to scale up the production!!
I am not criticizing Dassault but I don't know when you are able to make this up!! I even didn't mention anything about slow deliveries!! About 2 jets per month according to their CEO but actually they are able to make it or not how did you know?? So I said wait for the time it will be more clear for both of us how many jets they are able to make!!

They are the one who are proposing the timelines and they are the one who are missing it!! They said they will deliver it to this month and then this month and still they end up missing it!! So how unfortunate that people love to criticize other of this but when it comes to someone else they just want to avoid it!!

P.S. I really don't want to criticize anyone or any company here!! About GE if they are really struggling then it just a mirror to the people that well stabilized people can struggle then everyone can!!
About Dassault I am just saying that how they are going to propose the timeline of deliveries if they are going to win the tender!! Didn't mention anything like slow deliveries!!
 
I had the privilege to work with former Hal employee at top position in 1997 and also a technician while working abroad. I had personaly visited HAL and NAl. while i was working on telecom products in baglore the picture i got from my colleague regarding work culture in HAL was horrible and when i visited NAl it was a similar shock exept for the wind tunnel tester in NAL other projects were gathering dust. Even then ongoing work in tejas was horrible (1997 period). i feel hal should be propped up with private hand with lesser red tape to emerge as a true giant like ISRO.
 
Decide between Rafale and Eurofighter whichever supplier provides more tech transfer and help our own engine development program and establish local production lines..set a target of 18 which is more realistic...if IAF and GOI can wait for a decade and more to even launch a RFP..they can easily wait a year or two more for all aircrafts to be delivered
 
For IAF It's better to go for another 90 Rafale with a diplomatic and financial bargain with Republic of France...
 
Top contenders in my opinion:

1. Rafale (agreed for production line in India).
2. EF Typhoon
3. F-15 eagle 2 ( Good service in America)
4. Gripen E ( SAAB is not a reliable partner)
5. F-21 ( Basically F-16 with better avionics and frame & radars) doesn't provide better edge ober Pak F16.
Problem is with the decision making and political will. Our office bearers are yet to decide what to buy?
 
Our Political fraternity in dilemma to take an affirmative decision. No body knows what to do, whether to make in India or to buy as CBU. So many years passed by.... no concrete decision
 
there was news that SU-57 is going to be part of the lineup, let’s see.
Su-57 should not be in picture at all after the Russian fiasco costing the GoI 300 million. Walking out of the collaboration due to dissatisfaction over Russian's unwillingness to cooperate is already enough. After all Su-57 has nothing impressive to offer as a 5th gen fighter.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,176
Messages
32,325
Members
1,952
Latest member
s James
Back
Top