India May Have to Pay $2-3 Billion Extra for Domestically Produced Fighter Jets in MRFA Program

MRFA-Fighter-Jet.webp


The Indian Air Force's (IAF) ambitious plan to acquire 114 advanced fighter jets under the Medium Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) tender is facing a significant cost hurdle. A key element of the tender is the "Make in India" initiative, requiring substantial local production of the chosen aircraft.

However, this mandate is projected to add a hefty $2.2-3.4 billion to the program's cost, effectively increasing the price of each jet by $20-30 million compared to buying them directly from the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

The MRFA tender has attracted proposals for six advanced fighter jets, including twin-engine contenders like the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Block III, Eurofighter Typhoon, Russian MiG-35, and Dassault Rafale, as well as single-engine options like the Lockheed Martin F-16 Block V (F-21) and Saab Gripen-E. While each offers cutting-edge capabilities, the costs associated with establishing local production lines in India are substantial.

Several factors contribute to this cost increase. Building a dedicated assembly line in India requires significant upfront investment in facilities for component manufacturing, assembly, testing, and maintenance. Importing specialized equipment and machinery from the OEM further adds to the cost. Training local personnel to meet the stringent standards and precision required for fighter jet production involves considerable time and expense.

The initial production phase is also expected to be costly, with a slow ramp-up period as Indian facilities and personnel gain experience with new processes and technologies. The IAF likely won't see cost benefits from local production until the later stages of the program.

Adding to the cost challenge is the potential expense of technology transfer agreements. Each OEM would need to share key technologies for the IAF to maintain and operate the jets domestically, and these agreements often come with premium pricing.

These cost projections raise serious questions about the viability of the "Make in India" component of the MRFA program. While the initiative aims to boost domestic manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, the significant cost increase associated with local production might force the IAF and the Ministry of Defence to re-evaluate their strategy.

Despite these challenges, the IAF remains committed to the MRFA program, recognizing its importance for maintaining India's air combat capabilities. While acknowledging the higher costs associated with local production, the IAF emphasizes the long-term benefits of developing a robust domestic defence manufacturing ecosystem, which could lead to cost savings in future projects as expertise and infrastructure develop.
 
Again Delusional peoples are publishing Rafale picture as if they are ordered and made in India, each made in india Rafale F3 is going to cost minimum $300-$350Mln, GOI definitely can’t afford that much money and it doesn't make any sense or necessity to invest that kind of money on a 4th gen platform when Countries are moving to 6th snd 7th gen platforms.
 
MRFA consists of 6 twin-engine fighters: MIG-35, F-18, Eurofighter, Rafale, Su-35 & F-15, and 2 single-engine fighters: F-16 & Gripen, not four as mentioned in the article. Second, I have mentioned several times that MRFA would cost up to a 20% premium compared to importing in flyaway condition. The MRFA's purpose is to buy and make locally with an ecosystem. By doing this, in the future, the IAF will gain autonomy to upgrade it independently, plus it can integrate any weapon/tech on it, whether third-party or indigenous, apart from the OEM. That's the liberty the IAF will get. Third, the IAF can borrow some tech/features from the winner of MRFA for indigenous ongoing fighter jet projects, so nothing new in this. The only thing is that it should have local private players involved in manufacturing/final assembly lines, plus a local vendor ecosystem, unlike what the IAF later faces with problems with components/spare parts, having to depend on the OEM and then cannibalizing old fighter jets.
 
Either kill MRFA and bury it or take the bitter pill and go for it. Keeping it in limbo is worst option. That way it stays on the books and IAF cant make alternate arrangements such as increasing domestic orders.
 
Just put it out of its misery man. 2.2-3.4 billion dollars is SO much acceleration capital for Tejas MK2 and AMCA, and more much needed Netras. Perhaps one last direct order for 2-4 squadrons if it's absolutely needed, and no more foreign jets after that. I just don't believe MRFA will happen in 114 fighter form. It's too expensive and we're too cheap lol.

If we do spend that much we should be probing if we can use it towards getting 5th gen squadrons online before probably 2040 for a full AMCA one. Even if it's a reduced 72 fighter silver bullet force for stealth strike over 114 non-stealth fighters.
 
Too many fighter jets in development. We don't have that much budget or resources.
After ge404, tejas related incidents we just can't purchase usa jets, gripen, eurofighter.
We don't have too many options
rafale or kf 21 (block 2 in development).
 
Bharat is set to become 3rd largest economy in two three years. $3 billion spent extra won't make much difference. Extra money spent will help Bharat in becoming Aero hub of the world and world class " ECOSYSTEM ". Vocal for Local!
 
Again Delusional peoples are publishing Rafale picture as if they are ordered and made in India, each made in india Rafale F3 is going to cost minimum $300-$350Mln, GOI definitely can’t afford that much money and it doesn't make any sense or necessity to invest that kind of money on a 4th gen platform when Countries are moving to 6th snd 7th gen platforms.
Absolutely. India should make 6th gen fighter and drop mk1A,2,AMCA,MRFA etc. If Bharat starts now by 2050 we will have a 6th gen fighter.
 
Everything points to a decision that should have been made 10 years back.

15-20% extra per jet is fine. They have to make sure 20% aircrafts are direct imports, to help with delivery timelines.

And put in a clause that lets us integrate any/all Indian missiles and bombs on to the imported aircrafts. Money lost in setting up the facilities, we will more than make up in terms of substituting imported weapons package with our own, over its entire life time.
 
It is already too late for the MRFA project. It will take 5 years for the first fighters to roll out from the date of signing of the agreement. Better will be to invest that money on the current DRDO HAL fighters projects and fast track the projects and roll out Indegenous fighters.
 
Money is not an issue but how and where we spend these gizllion dollars is the real question. Do we spend 30B on yesterday's fighters or spend $20B on developing and acquiring 500 unmanned fighter platforms?
 
Fighters are obsolete as a huge drone swarm has changed the economics and strategy of war, just like anti-ship hypersonic missiles have changed naval warfare forever. Just like orbital weapons and robots in space have changed space war, just like UUV has changed undersea war. Robots have arrived. War is now a computer science-intensive, very large-scale project where AI can fight war on its own. AI commanders are already being tested.
 
How can we add infrastructure cost to the cost of aircraft??? We need to kick start manufacturing if we need to be independent ..subsequent aircrafts will definitely cost less
 
Again Delusional peoples are publishing Rafale picture as if they are ordered and made in India, each made in india Rafale F3 is going to cost minimum $300-$350Mln, GOI definitely can’t afford that much money and it doesn't make any sense or necessity to invest that kind of money on a 4th gen platform when Countries are moving to 6th snd 7th gen platforms.
As defense strategist Squrdit Sing pointed out, why would anyone want to invade a struggling shi-hole country like Pakistan? And if that’s the case, why would anyone want to invade India in its current state? Do we need that home made hardware?

Typically, for an advanced system, you would need around 300 units to break even. Until then, it might be more practical to buy airplanes ready to fly from the OEM maker.
 
Bharat is set to become 3rd largest economy in two three years. $3 billion spent extra won't make much difference. Extra money spent will help Bharat in becoming Aero hub of the world and world class " ECOSYSTEM ". Vocal for Local!
India has been license producing airplanes almost since independance. From the De Havilland Vampires, on through the Mig 21's and Su 30's. That's just the fighters, if you include trainers, helicopters, civil aircraft there would be a dozen or more.
So how come we haven't become an Aero-Hub yet? And why do you think this one deal will transform Indian industry?
 
Again Delusional peoples are publishing Rafale picture as if they are ordered and made in India, each made in india Rafale F3 is going to cost minimum $300-$350Mln, GOI definitely can’t afford that much money and it doesn't make any sense or necessity to invest that kind of money on a 4th gen platform when Countries are moving to 6th snd 7th gen platforms.
5th gen fighters would constitute a limited fleet while the bulk of the fighting force would remain 5- gen.
 
This is a serious decision making paralysis in the top brass. The tender itself is a flawed one. F15s and su35s should be disqualified right away as they dont fall under medium mrca and these aircrafts if entertained will potentially kill our super sukhoi dreams. All these aircrafts were already evaluated and now we are having another drama of evaluation. Bureaucrats should be barred from taking decisions related to defence acquisition. PATHETIC state of affairs.
 
The more I read this - the more I wonder why we are not buying 5-6 squadrons of SuperSukhoi 30 directly from Russia equipped with AESA radar (Su-57 radar will be a direct fit), uprated engines, latest avionics from France/Israel and Astra Mk2 /BRAHMOS missiles. With all the above, they will not cost more than $45 -50 Mill each. And their availability is >65%, proven in IAF service for last 20 years, maintainence is not an issue. Rafale availability is targeted at 75% - FYI. This plane will have 95% F-15 capability.

What is there in Chinese arsenal that can combat this? Leave Pakistan.
 
We are making our own fighters so no need to make MRFA fighters in India better we buy them through G2G route and set up only critical spare parts making plants in India by forming Joint venture with OEM ! Of TOT for 5th gen fighter like Su-57 or F-35 on offer then we can make them in India !
 
My opinion is Order 36 Rafale 4, So it will come after 2030. meanwhile order additional 72 Super Su-30s.
 
The question is 'Do you want to do it or not?'. If we are going to give excuses things will be delayed another 30 years at the least. As for the Gripen aircraft they are desperate to get the deal and will give a number of reasons to avoid other sellers come in.
 
How can we add infrastructure cost to the cost of aircraft??? We need to kick start manufacturing if we need to be independent ..subsequent aircrafts will definitely cost less
Because setting up that infrastructure costs money, and part of the infrastructure will be restricted to only the aircraft manufacturing, while some can be repurposed.

Regardless, that is money one has to pay at the start, hence it has been added for amortization purposes.
 
This MRFA was never going to happen and it was always going to be more expensive to manufacture the jet in India rather than importing it directly. Also we won’t receive any critical technology or get to manufacture most of it indigenously as well. We would still have to import key individual components and parts but at a much higher cost.

The only way to develop an affordable jet is to develop it indigenously within your ecosystem and technological advances. That’s why we need to start manufacturing the Tejas MK1A and also the prototypes for Tejas MK2, TEDBF and the AMCA jets.
 
The more I read this - the more I wonder why we are not buying 5-6 squadrons of SuperSukhoi 30 directly from Russia equipped with AESA radar (Su-57 radar will be a direct fit), uprated engines, latest avionics from France/Israel and Astra Mk2 /BRAHMOS missiles. With all the above, they will not cost more than $45 -50 Mill each. And their availability is >65%, proven in IAF service for last 20 years, maintainence is not an issue. Rafale availability is targeted at 75% - FYI. This plane will have 95% F-15 capability.

What is there in Chinese arsenal that can combat this? Leave Pakistan.
The Su-30MKI will easily cost north of 150 million USD apiece. Heck, the last few batches were costing around 100 million back on 2010-12.
 
What is this obsession with make in india.
the squadrons of iaf are at all time low. First fill that gap with immediate off the shore purchases. Then think about make in india.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,500
Messages
34,309
Members
2,093
Latest member
Capitulation
Back
Top