Indian Navy Eyes Helicopter Carriers Optimized for Drone Operations, Aims for Cost-Effective Surveillance and Power Projection in IOR

Indian Navy Eyes Helicopter Carriers Optimized for Drone Operations, Aims for Cost-Effective Surveillance and Power Projection in IOR


The Indian Navy is considering a significant modernization effort focused on acquiring Landing Helicopter Docks (LHDs) optimized for operating Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones. This strategic move aims to enhance the Navy's capabilities in the crucial Indian Ocean Region (IOR) while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

LHDs are multi-role warships traditionally used for amphibious operations, capable of deploying troops, helicopters, and landing craft. However, the Navy's vision involves adapting these platforms, or procuring new ones, specifically designed to serve as mobile bases for a variety of drones. This reflects a growing global trend of integrating unmanned systems into naval warfare.

The adaptability of LHDs is a key advantage. They can be modified to support both traditional naval operations and emerging drone-based strategies. This allows the Navy to maintain a flexible force ready to respond to a wide range of situations, from conventional threats to new challenges.

One of the primary benefits of this approach is extended operational reach. With advancements in drone technology, including increased range and flight endurance, LHDs could launch UAVs for long-duration missions. These missions could include reconnaissance, surveillance, and even combat operations over extensive maritime and coastal areas, significantly bolstering India's strategic presence in the IOR.

From an economic perspective, operating drones from LHDs offers potential cost savings compared to traditional aircraft carriers for specific types of missions. Drones can remain deployed for extended periods without the need for human pilots, which lowers operational expenses and reduces the risks inherent in manned aircraft flights.

Furthermore, LHDs equipped with drones could provide constant aerial surveillance, a critical capability for monitoring shipping lanes, detecting submarine activity, and providing early warning of potential threats. In combat scenarios, drones could perform tasks such as electronic warfare and precision strikes, all managed from the relative safety of the LHD. These drones could potentially operate in coordination with other naval vessels for integrated operations.

Beyond military applications, these specialized ships could play a crucial role in humanitarian aid and disaster relief. Drones could be used to rapidly assess damage, deliver essential supplies, or provide communication links in areas where traditional methods are difficult or impossible.

The Indian Navy's plan also anticipates future technological developments. LHDs can be adapted to accommodate evolving drone designs, including Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) UAVs, loitering munitions (drones designed to wait in an area before striking a target), and even Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) for air-to-air combat.

Future possibilities even include launching coordinated swarms of drones, potentially leveraging artificial intelligence for autonomous operations.

The LHD program could function as a practical testing ground for innovative naval aviation concepts. It would enable the Navy to experiment with various drone configurations and operational strategies.

The Indian Navy's interest in LHDs optimized for UAV operations mirrors a global trend. Unmanned systems are increasingly becoming a core component of modern naval warfare. By investing in this area, India aims not only to strengthen its naval capabilities but also to establish itself as a leader in maritime drone operations.

Given the strategic importance of the Indian Ocean and India's need to maintain a strong naval presence, LHDs equipped with UAVs are viewed as a crucial asset for both defense and projecting power.
 
Well, if we want UAVs to operate off the LHDs, that pretty much rules out the French Mistral design.

For a LHD capable of operating UAVs, we pretty much have only the Juan Carlos I-class or the Italian downsized Trieste variant that might be offered. In either case, we might need to adapt the design to remove the ski-jump and keep a flat deck for optimal UAV operations.

Here's an idea: Spain recently announced that they will be building two new LHDs to either complement or replace the Juan Carlos I. These are planned to be based on the Juan Carlos I. There is a possibility of co-design and co-building here. Get a common design, build 2 ships for Spain, 3-4 for India, and offer the design for export.
 
We should make such LHDs that can operate F-35B from its deck also apart from UCAVs/UAVs as we put IAC-II on hold ! 4-6 F-35B should be housed in these LHDs !
 
Well, if we want UAVs to operate off the LHDs, that pretty much rules out the French Mistral design.

For a LHD capable of operating UAVs, we pretty much have only the Juan Carlos I-class or the Italian downsized Trieste variant that might be offered. In either case, we might need to adapt the design to remove the ski-jump and keep a flat deck for optimal UAV operations.

Here's an idea: Spain recently announced that they will be building two new LHDs to either complement or replace the Juan Carlos I. These are planned to be based on the Juan Carlos I. There is a possibility of co-design and co-building here. Get a common design, build 2 ships for Spain, 3-4 for India, and offer the design for export.
L&T & Navantia already won the contract for making 4 LHD's based on Juan Carlos class, Mistral already lost the competition, Funding hasn't been allocated.
 
L&T & Navantia already won the contract for making 4 LHD's based on Juan Carlos class, Mistral already lost the competition, Funding hasn't been allocated.
If funding hasn't been allocated (and it hasn't), then there is no question of anyone winning or losing.

It is speculated that the contenders are Spain (with the Juan Carlos I design), France (with the Mistral design), Russia (with whatever they are trying to build to replace their cancelled Mistral order), and maybe Italy (with a scaled down Trieste design) and South Korea (with the Dokdo design).

Of these, I won't put any money on South Korea (due to their previous behaviour on ToT such as with the GSL MCMV deal) or Russia (they are just building ships that will quite possibly never be finished and are only making a fool out of people).

I am not too sure if Italy will actually offer a scaled-down Trieste design either, or if they offer the LxD design instead (the design to replace the San Giorgio-class). In any case, the Trieste variant might be too expensive.

As for France, the Mistrals are too small to act as drone carriers, and are more LPDs than LHDs.

That pretty much leaves Spain and the Juan Carlos I design.
 
Let us focus on immediate priorities first and then go for drone LHDs.
The LHDs or LPDs are a priority since our amphibious warfare fleet is not large enough and aging. We have only 4 LSTs left, of which INS Gharial is aging. This is against a stated need for 8-10 LSTs. We have just 8 LCUs against a requirement of 12-15 (essentially, 20-25 LSTs + LCUs). We also only have one LPD, and while INS Jalashwa still has another decade or so left in her, she is also an extremely old ship.

One proposed mix of the amphibious warfare fleet has been 4 LPDs or LHDs, 8 LSTs, and 13 LCUs. Alternatively, something like 2 LHDs, 3 LPDs, 10 LSTs, and 15 LCUs.

These ships would serve more as a supporting force for the Army rather than mount island invasions.
 
This is an essential project that we need to 100% indigenously design, develop and manufacture in India. If we can build an aircraft carrier then we can definitely develop our own LHD and I hope the navy has been working on it after all of this time. They have been trying to buy one for more than a decade now so it’s no secret.

Also we should try and develop it with a ski ramp so that our winged drones can be launched from them as well. This will be necessary for now and in the future.
 
The LHDs or LPDs are a priority since our amphibious warfare fleet is not large enough and aging. We have only 4 LSTs left, of which INS Gharial is aging. This is against a stated need for 8-10 LSTs. We have just 8 LCUs against a requirement of 12-15 (essentially, 20-25 LSTs + LCUs). We also only have one LPD, and while INS Jalashwa still has another decade or so left in her, she is also an extremely old ship.

One proposed mix of the amphibious warfare fleet has been 4 LPDs or LHDs, 8 LSTs, and 13 LCUs. Alternatively, something like 2 LHDs, 3 LPDs, 10 LSTs, and 15 LCUs.

These ships would serve more as a supporting force for the Army rather than mount island invasions.
We need to invest into engine test facilities like yesterday. We need to get our priorities right for now.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,266
Messages
43,769
Members
2,790
Latest member
ank321
Back
Top