Indian Navy's Third Nuclear SSBN, INS Aridhaman, Enters Final Phase of Extensive Sea Trials, Formal Induction Expected by 2025 End

Indian Navy's Third Nuclear SSBN, INS Aridhaman, Enters Final Phase of Extensive Sea Trials, Formal Induction Expected by 2025 End


India is poised to significantly enhance its strategic defence capabilities with the upcoming induction of its third nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), INS Aridhaman.

The 7,000-tonne vessel is in the final phase of extensive sea trials and is anticipated to be formally commissioned into the Indian Navy by the end of 2025.

The successful completion of these trials will mark a major step forward in strengthening India’s nuclear triad and ensuring a robust, sea-based nuclear deterrent.

Developed under the highly classified Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) project at the Ship Building Centre in Visakhapatnam, INS Aridhaman is a more advanced and formidable vessel than its predecessors.

While INS Arihant and INS Arighaat—commissioned in 2016 and 2024 respectively—cemented India's position as one of the few nations capable of building its own SSBNs, Aridhaman is considered a next-generation platform.

Scientific and defence sources indicate that it incorporates major technological upgrades, earning it the designation of the first submarine in the new S4 class.

INS Aridhaman boasts superior specifications, including a larger size and a heavier displacement of approximately 7,000 tonnes, an increase of 1,000 tonnes over the first two submarines.

It is powered by a more potent 83 MW Pressurised Light-Water Reactor designed by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC). This upgraded reactor not only provides greater power but also features a significantly lower acoustic signature, making the submarine exceptionally difficult for enemy forces to detect.

It can achieve an underwater speed of up to 24 knots (approximately 44 km/h), with its operational range limited only by the crew's food and supplies.

The most crucial enhancement in INS Aridhaman is its expanded missile capacity. The submarine is equipped with eight vertical launch tubes, doubling the four found on INS Arihant and INS Arighaat.

This allows it to carry a more potent arsenal, such as eight K-4 missiles with a range of 3,500 km or a larger loadout of 24 K-15 Sagarika missiles (750 km range).

This increased firepower enables the submarine to target distant strategic locations from the relative safety of Indian territorial waters, solidifying the nation's second-strike capability, which is a fundamental element of its no-first-use nuclear policy.

Reflecting the success of the 'Make in India' initiative in the defence sector, INS Aridhaman features approximately 70% indigenous content. Its construction involved key contributions from Indian industrial giants like Larsen & Toubro and Tata Power.

The vessel is also fitted with state-of-the-art domestic sonar, navigation, and fire-control systems, which have been refined based on operational experience from the first two Arihant-class submarines.

The commissioning of this submarine comes at a critical time for regional security in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

The induction is seen as a necessary step to maintain a strategic balance in light of China’s rapidly expanding naval fleet, which includes multiple advanced SSBNs and a submarine force projected to reach 80 vessels by 2035.

Furthermore, Pakistan is also enhancing its underwater capabilities with the acquisition of eight modern Yuan-class submarines from China. INS Aridhaman, along with the under-construction naval base INS Varsha, is central to India's strategy to counter these growing maritime challenges.

As the most survivable component of India's nuclear triad—which also includes land-based missiles and air-launched weapons—a nuclear submarine guarantees the ability to retaliate even if other systems are compromised in a first strike.

By ensuring a credible and secure second-strike option, INS Aridhaman will play a vital role in maintaining strategic stability and protecting India's national interests in an increasingly contested maritime environment.
 
This is what a PMO-led program does... The first submarine came, and they said it's underpowered.

Then instead of stopping production, they made 2 of the type and developed a bigger reactor for the 3rd.

Then there are plans for a follow-on type that'll be basically double in size.

Now look at how the Kaveri program went; they just kept stopping work waiting for paperwork, and the money given for the entire GTRE program was less than the cost of one Rafale.

Practically every PMO program, be it Nuclear subs or K-series missiles or integrated missiles programs, has worked with tight timelines and efficiency targets.
 
Good work. I think there is one more boat planned in Arihant class. May be by next year or so we will witness its launch for sea trials.
S4* has already been launched, from what is known. A fifth Arihant-class boat might happen, but we don't know for sure, and probably won't know for sure for a fair while still.
 
Order S5s as well. 11 conventional subs will retire by the mid-2030s, some even earlier. Apart from 6 Scorpene and 4 Arihant-class subs, we won't have any others by then.

We need to have a large number of newer subs by then.

Two SSNs were approved a few months ago. They will take 12+ years, as per estimates.

Project 76, even if approved in April 2026, will roll out the first sub in 7 years and then require about 1.5-2 years for trials. Expect some delay for the first sub's rollout. So, no new conventional sub will enter service before 2035.

2030 to 2035 will see a crisis in our submarine preparedness.
 
S4* has already been launched, from what is known. A fifth Arihant-class boat might happen, but we don't know for sure, and probably won't know for sure for a fair while still.
Cochin Shipyard has constructed 3 production lines for S5 subs. I hope they order them soon.
 
Cochin Shipyard has constructed 3 production lines for S5 subs. I hope they order them soon.
Sir, Cochin Shipyard will not build the S5-class SSBNs. Nuclear submarines in India will be built at the Ship Building Centre (SBC) in Visakhapatnam. In any event, CSL is planned to specialise in larger warships like carriers or amphibious assault ships and in small surface combatants such as corvettes and OPVs.
 
Sir, Cochin Shipyard will not build the S5-class SSBNs. Nuclear submarines in India will be built at the Ship Building Centre (SBC) in Visakhapatnam. In any event, CSL is planned to specialise in larger warships like carriers or amphibious assault ships and in small surface combatants such as corvettes and OPVs.
SBC is building 2 SSN's they don't have enough capacity. Work for S5 subs will be done in newly constructed facility at CSL. Few months ago Idrw published an article on the same. May be for some crucial work they may send it to SBC as well. But as per news it is CSL.
 
This is what a PMO-led program does... The first submarine came, and they said it's underpowered.

Then instead of stopping production, they made 2 of the type and developed a bigger reactor for the 3rd.

Then there are plans for a follow-on type that'll be basically double in size.

Now look at how the Kaveri program went; they just kept stopping work waiting for paperwork, and the money given for the entire GTRE program was less than the cost of one Rafale.

Practically every PMO program, be it Nuclear subs or K-series missiles or integrated missiles programs, has worked with tight timelines and efficiency targets.
The Kaveri engine failed because we lacked the staff who had the knowledge, experience, skills, education, scientific expertise etc. A jet engine is more difficult to develop because there is a size and weight limitation that you need to fit on a jet.

With a submarine you don’t face the same type of problems as you can make it to whatever size and weight you want it to including the type and size of the reactor.
 
India is now moving quickly as they need to increase the number of SSBN we need to have in service to cover Pakistan and China mainly. We also need to develop and install more longer range MIRV missiles which will allow us to hit targets from a safer distance.

Now we need to quickly start manufacturing our nuclear attack submarines and the S5 class SSBN. These are very important and critical submarines that we need to develop and need to increase our submarine and missile range.
 
Good news, but we are paying double, and it is very expensive in comparison to China and other countries, with the reactor being just half.
INS Aridhaman
Reactor Power: 83 MW
Speed: 24–26 knots submerged
Cost: $1.5–2 Billion
VS China
Type 094 SSBN
Reactor Power: 150 MW
Cost: $0.8–1 Billion

Ideally, the cost should have come down after INS Arihant.
 
Good news, but we are paying double, and it is very expensive in comparison to China and other countries, with the reactor being just half.
INS Aridhaman
Reactor Power: 83 MW
Speed: 24–26 knots submerged
Cost: $1.5–2 Billion
VS China
Type 094 SSBN
Reactor Power: 150 MW
Cost: $0.8–1 Billion

Ideally, the cost should have come down after INS Arihant.
Boss, SSBNs almost certainly cost more than that. Looking at the source for those quoted prices, I have a feeling the cost of the weapons or the reactor itself is not added in those figures. Each of those can push costs up considerably. A more realistic estimate is around 1.5 billion USD for a submarine roughly of Arihant's size, and something similar-ish for the Type 094. Do remember that this is because there are 6 Type 094s to 4 Arihants, and the Chinese re-used some of their technology from the older Type 092 SSBN program.
 
SBC is building 2 SSN's they don't have enough capacity. Work for S5 subs will be done in newly constructed facility at CSL. Few months ago Idrw published an article on the same. May be for some crucial work they may send it to SBC as well. But as per news it is CSL.
Sir, could you please share the news source which mentions CSL? I seem to have missed it.

That said, however, the SBC in Visakhapatnam recently had that new shipbuilding hall completed, and going by the dimensions of that thing, you can easily concurrently build 3-4 submarines in there, plus the older facilities that can support another 2 submarines.

Would appreciate anything you can share in this regard.
 
The Kaveri engine failed because we lacked the staff who had the knowledge, experience, skills, education, scientific expertise etc. A jet engine is more difficult to develop because there is a size and weight limitation that you need to fit on a jet.

With a submarine you don’t face the same type of problems as you can make it to whatever size and weight you want it to including the type and size of the reactor.
The biggest challenge in developing a jet engine is materials. It must be strong enough; if the material is strong, you can increase pressure and thrust.

Also, submarine manufacturing is way more difficult.

Guess what makes the most noise at any place and sits outside the sub body? It's the fan. There's no space to pack more insulation, by the way.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,382
Messages
57,620
Members
4,087
Latest member
Raj009
Back
Top