Indus Treaty Water flow management.

[Hari Sud]

Terrorists Unwittingly Push Pakistan into a Water Crisis

Without firing a shot, India’s Modi has cornered Pakistan. The terror planners in Islamabad never imagined India would reconsider the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), which grants Pakistan 80% of its agricultural water from the western rivers—Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. While India lacks the infrastructure to permanently block these rivers, it can temporarily disrupt the flow of the Chenab and Jhelum—especially during the agriculture growing season—crippling Pakistan’s crop output.

India’s run-of-the-river dams on Chenab and Jhelum, built under IWT for hydroelectricity, include storage reservoirs. By using maintenance protocols like sediment flushing, India can legally pause water flow or release excess water to flood fields—each move capable of damaging Pakistan’s agriculture.

Currently, there’s no means to disrupt the Indus itself, but within 5–10 years, that capability will exist. Then, Pakistan’s agricultural heartland will be vulnerable to India’s timing and tactics.

This is a strategic masterstroke. Decades of nuclear posturing by Pakistan are irrelevant in the face of this water-based leverage. Despite threats and pleas, India is now the one not listening—flipping the script on Pakistan’s long-standing provocations.

 

[Santosh1976]

The name of India was 'derived' from the name of river 'Indus'. And it's very political, as we have this name, India, from a Hindi word, means, a 'derived' nation's name from our own Indus River, a word of our old poems 👍
🇮🇳

We find population of Muslims is now closed to 20% in India, while it's stated that population of Muslims in Undivided India was less than 20% before 1947, while having Indus River in our control that time 🕳️

 

[P2S2]

The name of India was 'derived' from the name of river 'Indus'. And it's very political, as we have this name, India, from a Hindi word, means, a 'derived' nation's name from our own Indus River, a word of our old poems 👍
🇮🇳

We find population of Muslims is now closed to 20% in India, while it's stated that population of Muslims in Undivided India was less than 20% before 1947, while having Indus River in our control that time 🕳️

Religion wise it's probable they're all branches of Hinduism. Its probable Brahmins split up and formed a separate group under their absolute control. Abraham's name recreated by shuffling the letters Brahma. It is said that he should have a wife and Sara was derived by shortening Saraswati. Talking about the present situation, Hinduism excludes while Islam includes. New religions downplay genetics and try instituting ideas of Born Again for their members discounting genetics.
The jury is still out there about pull of genes. It could assist overcome differences in providing access to equality for returning genetic material.

 

[Santosh1976]

Religion wise it's probable they're all branches of Hinduism. Its probable Brahmins split up and formed a separate group under their absolute control. Abraham's name recreated by shuffling the letters Brahma. It is said that he should have a wife and Sara was derived by shortening Saraswati. Talking about the present situation, Hinduism excludes while Islam includes. New religions downplay genetics and try instituting ideas of Born Again for their members discounting genetics.
The jury is still out there about pull of genes. It could assist overcome differences in providing access to equality for returning genetic material.

sir, please don't hesitate to speak about religion or religious difference between Hinduism and Islam. its no shame to discuss this issue......
religious difference between "Home Religions" including Hinduism-Sikhism-Jain-Buddha and the certain "Foreign Religion", the Islam, and hence "the Partition" based on difference with Foreign Religions, and this certain reason was the main and widely written in books......
the Congress first rejected dividing then Indian Subcontinent on the name of religious difference, but they finally accepted it after incident like Great Kolkata Killing etc.
🇮🇳


=>
It is widely documented that the Indian National Congress adamantly opposed the Partition of India until the widespread communal violence, particularly the Great Calcutta Killings of August 1946, demonstrated that a united India was likely unattainable without a full-scale civil war.

Congress's Position Before the Killings

• Commitment to a United India: The Congress consistently viewed itself as the representative of all Indians of all faiths and its core ideology was a united, independent, and secular India.
• Rejection of the Two-Nation Theory: Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi were firmly against the concept of partitioning the country based on religion (the two-nation theory) and held this stance until the very end.
• Acceptance of the Cabinet Mission Plan: In mid-1946, the Congress initially accepted the British Cabinet Mission Plan, which proposed a loose federation and explicitly rejected the demand for a separate Pakistan, hoping for a constitutional solution that maintained a single union.

The Turning Point: Great Calcutta Killings

• Direct Action Day: Frustrated with the political deadlock and the failure of negotiations over the Cabinet Mission Plan, the Muslim League leader Muhammad Ali Jinnah called for "Direct Action Day" on August 16, 1946, to demand the creation of Pakistan.
• Eruption of Violence: The call led to massive, organized demonstrations in Calcutta that quickly descended into unprecedented, large-scale communal riots. Within 72 hours, an estimated 4,000 to 10,000 people were killed and 100,000 were left homeless.
• Spread of Riots: The violence in Calcutta sparked a cycle of retaliatory massacres and ethnic cleansing across other regions, including Noakhali, Bihar, and Punjab, leading to a year of constant communal clashes.

Reluctant Acceptance of Partition
The horrific scale of violence and the subsequent realization that the two communities could not live together in peace without the imminent threat of full-scale civil war led most senior Congress leaders, such as Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Jawaharlal Nehru, to reluctantly accept Partition as a "bitter medicine". They concluded that accepting a truncated India was the only practical way to stop the escalating bloodshed and achieve independence quickly. Gandhi, while still personally opposed, eventually had to accept the decision made by the rest of the Congress Working Committee.

Google Search

Google Search

 

[P2S2]

And it was Gandhi who had to pay for it with his life as Indira did decades later.
Now the ball is in our own personal courts.

 

[Santosh1976]

And it was Gandhi who had to pay for it with his life as Indira did decades later.
Now the ball is in our own personal courts.

we now find population of Muslims of Undivided India, before 1946, at around 20%. while now Muslim population has exceeded the 20% at present in divided India?
and if this was the issue before Partition also, then we find ourselves on the same state even in today's India..........

the name Indus, after the river Indus is very political, while discussing the nation's name India. it was our land, the Hindustan, before 1946. this Hindi name, Indus, while having control on whole Indus River could help us see the whole "Akhand Bharat".
the name India is derived from "Indus River", Indus, the name taken from our old Hinduism Poems 👍 .

as written by the first Indian PM, Mr Nehru, this certain river was our own land till 1946, the Hindustan, which was upto to the Pathans (Pashtuns) in the northwest. 👍
🇮🇳
.

=>
In The Discovery of India, and his related essays on "The Variety and Unity of India," Nehru emphasizes the vast differences and shared heritage among various Indian communities, from the Tamils in the south to the Pathans (Pashtuns) in the northwest.

Google Search

Google Search

.
=> 10 Sept 2025 — The name India is derived from the Indus River. In ancient Sanskrit, it was called Sindhu. Persians pronounced it as Hindu, 👍
🇮🇳

Which River Gave India Its Name?

Find out which river gave India its name. Discover how the Indus River, known as Sindhu in ancient times, shaped India’s identity and history. Keep reading more about India.

www.jagranjosh.com

 

[Santosh1976]

Key aspects of his writings regarding this topic include:

• Acknowledging Diversity: Nehru highlights the significant physical and cultural differences among India's people, using the "Pathan of the Northwest and the Tamil of the South" as primary examples of this wide variety.
• Shared Identity: Despite these outward differences, such as variations in "racial stock, face, figure, food, clothing, and language," he argues that a "tremendous impress of oneness" and a common national heritage binds them all as distinctly Indian.
• Cultural Influences: He notes that the Northwest Frontier Province (historical home of many Pashtuns) had Central Asian influences, even comparing some Patan dances to Russian Cossack dancing, while still maintaining an evident Indian spirit.

The phrase "Unity in Diversity," which perfectly describes the core theme of Nehru's observations, was coined by him in The Discovery of India to encapsulate how different cultures, races, and religions coexist with a strong sense of unity in the subcontinent.
👍

Google Search

Google Search

 

[Santosh1976]

The name of India was 'derived' from the name of river 'Indus'. And it's very political, as we have this name, India, from a Hindi word, means, a 'derived' nation's name from our own Indus River, a word of our old poems 👍
🇮🇳

We find population of Muslims is now closed to 20% in India, while it's stated that population of Muslims in Undivided India was less than 20% before 1947, while having Indus River in our control that time 🕳️

10 Sept 2025 — The name India is derived from the Indus River. In ancient Sanskrit, it was called Sindhu. Persians pronounced it as Hindu, 👍
🇮🇳

Which River Gave India Its Name?

Find out which river gave India its name. Discover how the Indus River, known as Sindhu in ancient times, shaped India’s identity and history. Keep reading more about India.

www.jagranjosh.com

 

[P2S2]

Interesting stuff for the young. They are confused with differences thrust artificially upon them.
It's confusing why their elders need plots here while they already have plots elsewhere.