Former Pakistani High Commissioner to India, Abdul Basit, has sparked controversy with his recent assertion that Pakistan's Nasr (Hatf 9) short-range ballistic missile is superior to India's Pralay tactical missile. This claim has been met with widespread skepticism and dismissal from Indian defence experts. The Nasr, with a range of 60-70 kilometers, is designed for battlefield use and tactical nuclear deterrence.
Basit argues its strength lies in its ability to deliver quick and precise strikes against enemy armor and troop formations. In contrast, India's Pralay missile has a range of 150 to 500 kilometers and is designed for both tactical and strategic applications.
Indian experts emphasize that the Pralay's greater range provides a significant operational advantage, allowing India to engage targets at varying distances. This versatility makes the Pralay suitable for a wider range of scenarios, including striking strategic targets beyond the battlefield. Additionally, the Pralay incorporates advanced features such as mid-air maneuvers to enhance its survivability against enemy defenses.
While the Nasr serves a specific tactical purpose, particularly in a nuclear context, analysts argue that the Pralay's extended range and technological capabilities make it a more versatile and strategically valuable asset for India.
Basit's claims have been widely ridiculed in Indian media, with many questioning his understanding of missile technology and suggesting his statements may be politically motivated. The consensus among Indian defense experts is that the Pralay represents a more potent and adaptable missile system, providing India with a clear advantage in terms of range and strategic flexibility.
