Russia Seeks to Revive Stalled Multirole Transport Aircraft Project with India, Engine Dispute Remains Key Hurdle

Russia Seeks to Revive Stalled Multirole Transport Aircraft Project with India, Engine Dispute Remains Key Hurdle


Russia is making a renewed push to revive the long-stalled Multirole Transport Aircraft (MTA) project with India. This joint venture, which had previously faltered due to disagreements over engine specifications, is being presented to India once again with a key concession from the Russian side.

The MTA project, initially conceived in 2007, was intended to be a collaborative effort between Russia's United Aircraft Corporation and India's Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). The goal was to develop a new transport aircraft to replace India's aging fleet of Antonov An-32s.

India planned to procure 45 aircraft, while Russia aimed to acquire around 100. However, the project hit a roadblock in 2016 when HAL withdrew, primarily due to differences over engine selection and project management.

With the Indian Air Force (IAF) currently in the process of issuing a tender for 60 new transport planes under the MTA program, Russia sees an opportunity to re-enter the competition.

This time, they are offering to equip the aircraft with engines featuring Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC), addressing a major point of contention that led to the project's earlier stall.

Despite this concession, the IAF maintains its preference for Western or European commercial engines for the Indian variant of the MTA. This preference stems from logistical considerations, as sourcing parts for Western engines is perceived as easier, potentially leading to higher aircraft availability rates. This stance is rooted in past experiences with joint projects where Russian engines, lacking FADEC, presented maintenance and operational challenges.

Historically, Russia was reluctant to incorporate FADEC systems into their engines, a significant factor in HAL's decision to exit the project. Now, while Russia appears willing to adapt, the IAF's insistence on non-Russian engines introduces a new set of challenges. This includes potential issues related to intellectual property, technology transfer, and the integration of foreign engines into a Russian airframe design.

The engine issue remains a critical hurdle in reviving the MTA project. If India and Russia can find common ground on this aspect, it could significantly benefit both nations' aerospace sectors.

However, if they fail to reconcile their differences, India might opt for one of the Western contenders, potentially impacting the long-standing defence collaboration between the two countries.
 
Interesting situation, but Bharat will get the best deal, though a few days ago there was an article by CAG about procurement policy regarding the formulation of ASQRs even after the sour experience with GE. Fingers crossed.
 
MTA is for AN32 replacement.
It will be wise to continue with Russian partnership.
Russian engine with FADC control are reliable and can be maintened in India with spareparts sourced locally.
In defence a reliable and trustworthy partner is important..Any funding and project management work haring IPR issus can be negotiated and settled.
 
Western jets will be quite expensive, so Bharat should go for a Russian partnership. HAL should show some flexibility, and the same goes for Russia.
 
For Medium Transport Aircraft, C390 millenium and A400M are best. Choose any one of them. For heavy Transport Aircraft, build our own with joint ventures
 
MTA is for AN32 replacement.
It will be wise to continue with Russian partnership.
Russian engine with FADC control are reliable and can be maintened in India with spareparts sourced locally.
In defence a reliable and trustworthy partner is important..Any funding and project management work haring IPR issus can be negotiated and settled.
Going with Russia will now be a big challenge in today's scenario. Sanctions have hit hard and hence the project will be riddled with uncertainty.
 
MTA is for AN32 replacement.
It will be wise to continue with Russian partnership.
Russian engine with FADC control are reliable and can be maintened in India with spareparts sourced locally.
In defence a reliable and trustworthy partner is important..Any funding and project management work haring IPR issus can be negotiated and settled.
Russia hasn't made any new civil or military transport aircraft since the fall of the Soviet Union. The state of the aviation sector is not good.
 
Isn't the the 3rd, or 4th military project that Russia has eagerly offered to India in the past year? The Su-75, & the Su-57 comes to mind, and now the MTA. Makes me wonder if Russia is so desperate for funds that they are "willing" to "give away" their technology. Considering previous failed, and "over cost" projects with India, IMHO, any new joint venture with Russia should be made with those previous projects in mind. Russia has a tendency to make their contracts to only benefit themselves.
 
Until IAF remains indecisive & keeps a snail's pace in acquisition of MTA, such propositions will keep coming, further confusing the IAF intellectuals.
 
I believe all three current contenders are more well equipped from having a proven design, engine and track record.
 
The main problem why we scraped the deal was because of Russia’s insistence on using their own engines but we didn’t want that because of the engines capability and performance was poorer than a western engine.

The only problem is that we don’t know how to develop a MTA indigenously as it will take far too long to develop and by then most of our AN 32 will be dead. Buying from Embraer or Airbus in small numbers will be expensive, we won’t get a lot or any technology transferred to us or manufacture parts of it locally.
 
In future the main fight will be for aero-engines. Countries which have functional aero-engines will have autonomy. Countries which don't will have to act as lapdogs of those countries which will supply them with aero-engines.

THese MTA plane - even if it is developed will have zero use for India - if we have no control over the Engines.
 
India can try to make it on a 50-50 partnership, provided it too becomes holder of all the IPRs. If the Russians do not agree, then good bye.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,653
Messages
38,693
Members
2,478
Latest member
Military Maven
Back
Top