Saab Woos India with Gripen-E for MRFA Tender, Promises Seamless Integration of Indian Weapons and Software Collaboration

In the race to secure India's Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) contract for 114 new fighter jets, Saab is making a strong pitch with its Gripen-E, emphasizing its commitment to "Make in India" and offering seamless integration of Indian-made weapons.

Saab India has reiterated its pledge to manufacture the Gripen-E in India if selected, and is open to incorporating a range of indigenous weapons, including the Astra beyond visual range air-to-air missile, the Rudram anti-radiation missile, and the Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon (SAAW).

A senior Saab India official highlighted the ease of integrating these weapons, stating that it primarily involves software upgrades to the fighter's core weapons system computer. Saab engineers are prepared to collaborate with the IAF's Aircraft & Systems Testing Establishment (ASTE) to ensure smooth integration from the early stages of production. This would allow the IAF to deploy its own weaponry on the Gripen-E, increasing its versatility and compatibility with India's existing defence infrastructure.

Saab's offer to collaborate with the IAF on software development for weapons integration is a significant step, demonstrating the company's willingness to tailor the Gripen-E to India's specific operational needs. By working closely with ASTE, Saab aims to guarantee seamless integration of Indian weapon systems without delays or complications, granting the IAF greater autonomy and operational flexibility.

Regarding the Raven ES-05 radar, a key component of the Gripen-E's sensor suite developed by Leonardo Aerospace, Defence and Security, the Saab official confirmed Leonardo's full cooperation with Saab's plans. This suggests that ensuring the radar's compatibility with Indian operational requirements will not be an issue. However, it remains unclear whether the IAF will demand full access to the source code, a sensitive issue often linked to technology transfer and strategic autonomy.

This development comes as India seeks to modernize its air force and bolster its domestic defence industry. Saab's proposal, with its focus on indigenous production and weapons integration, positions the Gripen-E as a strong contender in the MRFA competition.

 

[PKPRS]

If Gripen qualify the technical bids and enter financial bids it will surely wins the competition, Unless Indian Govt consider political weightage. IAF loves Gripen and have flown Gripen formation on air force day (2017).
Lokking at HAL and ADA record we are not getting LCA Mk2 before 2035.

yes Gripen-E is the only jet that makes more practical and financial sense, the best thing is, it shares the same engine with Tejas MK2 and other local products, the same Indian company that makes Gripen-E/F can make Tejas Mk2 in a separate production line.

 

[Pramkumar]

better to cancel the MRFA and invest in Kaveri, give additional orders for MK1A and MK2 and develop ORCA as twin Kaveri engine product.

 

[sandy 007]

Good competition for MRFA, Bharat at the End of the will benefit

Very surprisingly SAAB offering Gripen E for the MRFA program but from where they will get the engine GE414 when US not Providing us. This only shows that Either US is putting hindrance in the Tejas MK2 program or US only interested in selling jet engines to NATO countries.

Secondly Their So called Avionics and AESA radar also sourced from many European vendors.
This only shows that "" Asman se gira aur Khajur per latka """.That will be the real condition of IAF. In case US stops or ceases the engine from where will IAF will ask Engine.
It looks USA wants only market but only through the NATO members.

Gripen Even if they win the tender what is the guaranty that US will provide them all engine they required.
Purchasing Gripen is a costly affair. To my mind Gripen fitted with US engine especially F414 is no longer guaranty to Indian Airforce much needed requirements to fill the gap.
Where as I think European Consortium Typhoon can fill the gap very easily since they don't required US engine's.

 

[Renu Sri]

It is even more expensive than other western twin engine jets and they can’t even give us 50% ToT.

How is it more expensive? Procurement cost and operation cost both are much lower than twin engine fighters. India need fighter planes in quantity, grippen will bring that quantity and quality

 

[Akshat]

How is it more expensive? Procurement cost and operation cost both are much lower than twin engine fighters. India need fighter planes in quantity, grippen will bring that quantity and quality

Well it is costlier than Rafale for sure. Or at least in the Brazil deal, they paid more than what India paid for Rafale. And most countries are now paying even less. So the procurement cost is much higher.

 

[Sumit Waid]

It uses American F414 engines so it's not a reliable partner. The only option IAF has are Rafaels or MIGs. But given the backlog of Rafaels and over-reliability on Russia, none of them are practical. Our government is in a very tight spot on this.