A petition asking the Supreme Court of India to become involved in Nikhil Gupta's extradition case to the United States was denied. Charges are presently pending against Mr. Gupta in the Czech Republic about his purported participation in a plot to kill Khalistani leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.
A family member of Mr. Gupta filed a petition asking the court to order the Indian government to give diplomatic support, which would include legal help and consular access. The case's judge, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, expressed doubts about the court's capacity to get involved because of the nature of the case.
Justice Khanna said, "The matter relates to international law and we have to respect the jurisdiction of courts in foreign countries."
He went on to say that, in accordance with the Vienna Convention, the extent of any possible measure would be restricted to ensuring consular access.
Consular access has already been granted, as stated in the petition itself.
It is alleged that Mr. Gupta was involved in an attempt to hire hitmen to kill Mr. Pannun in New York. The allegation is based on charges made by the United States.
He was then detained in Prague and is now being held there while extradition procedures are being carried out.
The Supreme Court's ruling demonstrates a cautious approach to getting involved in a complex matter with international ramifications.
It emphasises how crucial it is to comply with established legal precedents and protocols while also acknowledging the sovereignty of other countries.
