Three Engine Configuration on Chinese 6th-Gen Fighter Suggests WS-10C Limitations, Compromising Stealth for Thrust

china-jet-.jpg


The recent unveiling of China's sixth-generation stealth fighter jet, featuring an unusual trijet engine configuration, has sparked debate among defence analysts regarding the progress of China's high-thrust jet engine technology. Experts suggest this design choice reflects ongoing challenges in developing engines with sufficient thrust for a strike-optimized stealth fighter-bomber.

Analysts find the trijet configuration unusual for a modern stealth platform, where twin-engine designs are generally preferred for their efficiency and streamlined stealth profiles. This suggests that the WS-10C engines currently used by China are unable to deliver the necessary thrust for a twin-engine configuration, forcing a compromise in design.

For comparison, the Pratt & Whitney F135, which powers the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, generates a maximum thrust of 181 kN. The B-21 Raider, a stealth bomber unveiled by the United States, employs two F135-like engines with ample combined thrust for its maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of 81,647 kg.

Based on the trijet design, analysts estimate that the Chinese stealth fighter-bomber has an MTOW of approximately 50,000 kg, significantly lower than the B-21 Raider. This suggests the aircraft is optimized for shorter strike missions with a more limited payload.

The use of three engines instead of two indicates that China has not yet mastered the development of engines with a thrust range of 150-180 kN, crucial for powering larger, more versatile stealth aircraft.

While the trijet design compensates for this engine limitation, it likely comes at the cost of reduced stealth capabilities. A trijet configuration introduces additional exhaust signatures, potentially compromising the aircraft's overall stealth compared to twin-engine designs. Additionally, it may lead to higher maintenance requirements and increased fuel consumption.

China's advancements in stealth technology and aerodynamics are evident in this new fighter-bomber, but the trijet design highlights a persistent weakness: jet engine development. Developing a high-thrust engine capable of powering future stealth platforms in twin-engine configurations remains a key challenge for China's aviation industry.

For India, the Chinese sixth-generation jet's trijet configuration serves as a reminder of the critical importance of indigenous engine development programs. With the AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) program underway, ensuring access to a high-thrust engine that meets future requirements is paramount for India's pursuit of self-reliance in defence technology.
 
Make a 100% 4.5 gen jet and a decent jet engine before criticizing others who are two generations ahead.
 
Chinese engines are 4th gen. Second, they are underpowered, and yet this 4th-gen is not perfected. Even Pakistan is not happy to have Chinese engines on JF-17 and instead wants Russian engines. It's an overreaction to a flying mock model with old engines. By the way, I am always right. China is not yet perfected in engine tech. They have a long way to go.
 
Talking of engines, China has the billions to pour into research, and it's a matter of time until they get it right. We may gloat that they don't have engines to Western standards, but just wait. They have distinct advantages: 1) Unlimited money, 2) Tech investment for long-term dividends, 3) Highly capable engineers, 4) No bureaucracy to sit on files, 5) High nationalistic feeling among the population, unlike leftist woke anti-national politicians and their chelas in India.

The fact that the platform has 3 engines chuckles my jingo mind as it means a larger IR signature, very easy to detect at long ranges, stealth or no stealth.
 
Chinese engines are 4th gen. Second, they are underpowered, and yet this 4th-gen is not perfected. Even Pakistan is not happy to have Chinese engines on JF-17 and instead wants Russian engines. It's an overreaction to a flying mock model with old engines. By the way, I am always right. China is not yet perfected in engine tech. They have a long way to go.
This is called out-of-the-box thinking. Innovation or call what you may. Chinese went against the mythical super-knowledge of western "experts" and created their own mythology.
 
I believe the latest Chinese engine is not the WS-10, but WS-15 which is better than the former in terms of performance and reliability.
 
India needs to quickly develop and manufacture our fighter jet and we desperately need the AMCA and the Ghatak stealth drone which are the main offensive power that we need.

We also need to hire people with talent and the private sector companies to help in designing and manufacturing the jets, helicopters and drones. If we have to take out a large loan then we should definitely do so as long as we can develop it on time and to the same technology requirements. This should also be seen as a long term investment in securing our country which will allow our economy and country to grow.
 
We don't have engine that's bad news for us. And they still need improvement that's good news for us. Batter we find solution to our problems fast before they start outperforming. Which they have already.
 
Chinese engines are 4th gen. Second, they are underpowered, and yet this 4th-gen is not perfected. Even Pakistan is not happy to have Chinese engines on JF-17 and instead wants Russian engines. It's an overreaction to a flying mock model with old engines. By the way, I am always right. China is not yet perfected in engine tech. They have a long way to go.
although chinese engines is not perfected ,they are produced by the chinese ,where are indian engines, are they invented and produced by indians
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,596
Messages
36,619
Members
2,323
Latest member
AbhijitB
Back
Top