US May Formally Offer F-35A to India with Israel-Like "Adir" Configuration, Effectively Countering China's J-20 and Pak's J-35

US May Formally Offer F-35A to India with Israel-Like Adir Configuration, Effectively Countering China's J-20 and Pak's J-35


The United States government is reportedly preparing to make a formal proposal to India for the sale of Lockheed Martin's F-35A Lightning II stealth fighter jets in June 2025. This move signals a potentially significant enhancement of India's air power and its strategic alignment with the U.S.

This development follows earlier statements from U.S. officials. In February 2025, then-U.S. President Donald Trump, during a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Washington, indicated plans to increase military sales to India, specifically mentioning the F-35.

This intention was further confirmed by Vice President JD Vance during his visit to India in April 2025, highlighting a strong American interest in bringing India into the select group of countries operating the advanced fighter.

The proposed sale is expected to be structured as a government-to-government (G2G) Foreign Military Sales (FMS) agreement. This pathway could allow for deliveries to commence as early as late 2027, notably bypassing India’s ongoing Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program, which aims to locally manufacture 114 jets with technology transfer.

The F-35A is the conventional take-off and landing version of the Joint Strike Fighter. It is a fifth-generation multirole aircraft designed for a range of missions including air superiority, ground attack, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).

Its capabilities are enhanced by advanced radar-absorbing materials, a design that minimizes its radar signature, and sophisticated sensor systems like the AN/APG-81 AESA radar, offering superior stealth and interoperability with allied forces.

The aircraft was showcased at the Aero India exhibitions in Bengaluru in 2023 and 2025, where its agility and advanced systems reportedly impressed Indian military observers.

The U.S. offer is expected to include a specialised "Adir-type configuration" for India. This would involve integrating BNET software-defined radios and indigenous Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) systems, similar to the F-35I "Adir" variant flown by Israel, which can operate without direct reliance on U.S. mission data servers.

A G2G FMS deal, managed by the Pentagon, typically offers standardised pricing and delivery conditions comparable to those for the U.S. military, potentially resulting in lower costs than direct commercial purchases.

This approach is anticipated to enable quicker delivery, with the first F-35As possibly arriving by late 2027. Such a timeline would address the Indian Air Force's (IAF) pressing requirement to counter China's expanding fleet of J-20 and J-35 stealth fighters, as well as Pakistan's anticipated acquisition of J-35A jets around 2028–2029.

The U.S. initiative to supply F-35s to India is consistent with broader American geopolitical objectives, particularly aimed at balancing China's growing military influence in the Indo-Pacific region. India's air force currently faces a reduction in its fighter squadron strength, reportedly down to 31 from an authorised 42.

According to the ISS Military Balance, between 2014 and 2024, China significantly increased its fighter aircraft numbers by 435, while India’s fleet decreased by 151. The IAF’s current inventory relies heavily on older Russian aircraft like the Su-30 MKI and MiG-29.

Delays in indigenous projects, such as the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) which is not expected to be operational before 2034, further highlight the need for advanced fighter jets.

The announcements by President Donald Trump and Vice President Vance reflect a U.S. strategy to deepen defence cooperation with India, potentially taking advantage of Russia's diminished capacity as an arms supplier due to international sanctions and the conflict in Ukraine.

India has already procured U.S. defence equipment worth over $20 billion since 2008, including a recent deal for 31 MQ-9B drones in 2024. The nation is projected to invest approximately $200 billion in military modernization over the coming decade.

An F-35 deal would place India alongside key U.S. allies such as NATO members, Israel, Japan, and Australia, strengthening its strategic ties with Washington while also helping to address trade imbalances through increased Indian imports of American oil and gas.

India's existing MRFA program, designed to acquire 114 multirole combat aircraft with substantial technology transfer and local manufacturing, has attracted several international contenders. These include Dassault's Rafale, Boeing's F-15EX, Lockheed Martin's F-21 (a variant of the F-16), and Sukhoi's Su-35. The Rafale is often considered a leading candidate due to the IAF's existing fleet of 36 such aircraft.

The MRFA initiative strongly emphasises the "Make in India" policy, aiming to boost the domestic defence manufacturing sector through partnerships with companies like Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

However, the potential F-35A deal would operate outside this framework, involving a direct FMS purchase without technology transfer. This could affect India’s ability to integrate its own systems or perform upgrades independently, a challenge previously noted with the IAF's Jaguar fleet.

The FMS route offers the significant advantages of speed and predictability, with deliveries potentially starting in 2027, compared to the MRFA tender process which has faced delays.

Nevertheless, this path also presents challenges. The F-35A's unit cost is approximately $82.5 million (flyaway), with export prices generally ranging between $100 million and $110 million, excluding weaponry and logistical support.

A fleet of 40 to 50 F-35s, as has been speculated, could amount to an initial outlay of $4 billion to $5.5 billion. Lifecycle costs, covering operations and maintenance over several decades, could be substantially higher, potentially exceeding $100 billion, as estimated for Canada's planned fleet of 88 F-35s.

Furthermore, U.S. export controls mandate strict end-user agreements to protect sensitive technology. This is a particular point of attention given India's operation of Russian S-400 air defence systems, a factor that led to Turkey's removal from the F-35 program.

Several obstacles could also complicate the F-35 offer. India's longstanding defence relationship with Russia, which includes the S-400 systems and the Su-30 MKI fighters, raises concerns in the U.S. regarding technology security. There are worries about potential F-35 data exposure to Russia, possibly through mechanisms like the BRICS group.

Standard F-35 operations typically require daily activation codes from the U.S., with Israel's F-35I "Adir" being a notable exception that operates with greater autonomy—a level of independence India might desire but may find difficult to fully achieve.

Additionally, reported maintenance issues with the F-35, including average repair times of 141 days and a high critical failure rate noted in a 2024 Pentagon report, could pose logistical challenges for the IAF, especially without local production capabilities.

Geopolitically, while the deal aligns with U.S. objectives to counter China, India's traditional stance of strategic autonomy, its neutral position on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and its strong emphasis on "Make in India" for defence procurement could influence its decision.

As an alternative, Russia has reportedly offered to co-produce its Su-57 Felon stealth fighter in India with full technology transfer. While this aligns more closely with India's indigenisation goals, the Su-57's limited combat deployment and reportedly larger radar cross-section may make it a less attractive option for the IAF when compared to the combat-proven F-35.
 
Dont believe US. They sign the deals and then delay purposefully to undermine Indias defence capabilities. Look at GE 404 engine deal, Apache deals, They cheat us and also provide assistance to Pakistan for F16 maintenance, F35 may also have kill switch to disable them during our operations against adversaries. Never believe US. Better to get the 5th gen figthers from Russsia and configure them and fast track AMCA and engine development on National Priority.
 
Get secure Data link as per our requirement and rest is okay as in network centric warfare , data flow is critical and second is mission planning for such hitech jets. Get Navy 50, Army 100 and Airforce 150 so multiple layers and defensive line of jets are there as it's VSTOl so Army Aviation must come up standard to Handle this .Army must have this and somthing called FARP , forward aircraft. Refulling platforms or mobile refulling stations must be made so then jets can petrol mountains and rugged terrain effectively and use stealth and sensors to see deep into enemy territory and then call in missile strikes or artillery on needed postions. This F35 ,even if 20 in number can supress 1000 km easily so aim for 300 now .
 
These stealth need not be used for offence, but to get near the borders as it's now seen that even 200km is less for conventional jets and they too have to use standoff weapons, so these can get near, see and sense deep inside borders and we use Shri Maha Astra Brahmos to do the rest .
 
We need to fully digest Ops Sindoor lessons first with a full analysis.
BVR combat appears to be order of the day , wherein high speed missiles in our armoury prevailed. That is step one , get ASTRA Missiles Mk2 and Mk3 fast tracked.

P-17 missiles of China likely to be supplied to PAF?
That will enable PAF to deploy their fighters at extreme ranges of 300 kms plus, close to their western borders and guided by their AWACS aircraft.

Our Brahmos A , NG and -2 variants need to be inducted speedily in IAF / IN platforms. At 500 to 800 kms ranges , these missiles will render PAF and Chinese bases into mincemeat. All military installations in Pakistan/ Tibet are valid targets for next phase of “ paused “ Ops Sindoor.
 
F-35 with TOT and source code is useless like Rafale & Rafale-M better trust Su-57 based PMF/FGFA allowing us to use own weapons on these fighters jets ! G2G sales is like offering F-35 on rent by receiving full prize by OEM ! Not good deal !
 
Carpet bombing times are over due to long range radars, AWACS, and IRST scanners, and missile range is now 200 km plus for Air to air and surface to air so era of drones, sensors and stealth has come. We need plan , where stealth can peer inside the enemy defence web, stay hidden in jungles and do work due to Vertical take off capabilities,and call in strike package from far away , as far as 1000 k so it's not possible to engage by enemy .We need to use weapons and surely,post op Sindoor, it looks that we are in good hands.With F35 we think China and not Pakistan,if we really need to plan, Pakistan is over and out .
 
Wow, buying a US platform, that too a fighter jet, with a string of restrictions and conditions is a waste of investment. With recent experience of GE Aero-Engine F404 and F414 hurdles for local assembly, I don't think talks will conclude even in the next five to six years. By that time, the Trump Administration may not be in power. MRFA has taken almost two decades to fructify. The US must be ready for the duration of talks/negotiations. Bharat wants a customized fighter jet with autonomy/sharing of source code, integration of indigenous as well as third-party weapons and sensors, and local assembly with ToT and eco-system, which is unlikely from the US, who wants to control the weapon system sold to their friendly countries. Remember, the US wants to sell in flyaway condition, meaning the US will have full control of this fighter jet, not a parity deal like Israel has.
 
It completely depends on whether this machine will be able to integrate into existing systems or not, which includes Indian, Israeli, and Russian systems. Along with this, the geopolitical threats attached to this platform will also affect India's decision. But yes, it's one of the most advanced systems currently in existence.
 
I am a huge anti-US fighter jets guy and indigenisation lover. But, looking at the condition of IAF for next 10 years and our neighbours, we do need a stealth platform, even if in small numbers, 3-4 squadrons, just to keep the minimum deterrence active, especially at Chinese borders. Su-57 is not a real stealth platform; if we can get huge Israeli Adir-like upgrades with some good package for ourselves, we should buy it. AMCA is a minimum of 10-12 years away; that's a huge capability gap against an adversary with two 6th gen fighter prototypes already flying.
 
If the US wants to sell F-35s, kindly provide the same deal that they offered to Israel, as Russia with the Su-57 has already offered Indian weapon integration, which is a much better deal.
 
What's the point? We can't integrate our own weapons into it; we can't even use it without US permission. We will be dependent on the USA for maintenance and repair and regular supply of weapons. If tension rises between India and the USA, they could delay software updates, making it even harder to use 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
F-35 disadvantage:
  1. USA can't be trusted.
  2. Kill switch if any.
  3. USA can sanction anytime.
  4. No indigenous weapon.
  5. Cannot be used against Pakistan.
  6. No local production.
  7. No source.
  8. Cannot match current weaponry.
  9. Cannot use with S-400.
  10. Next USA government came with different plan in next 4 years.
  11. If USA intentionally delaying GE 404 engine, they are highly unreliable, and if they unintentionally do it due to supply chain issue, they are highly inefficient.
Now give me any advantages of it, if any.
 
Wow, if this is true, India should immediately purchase 40-50 F-35s and try negotiating a localized logistics and maintenance office to bring the cost down; the 141-day repair time will reduce that way.
 
Though I prefer Su-57 over the F-35, if we are getting Israeli F-35i type configuration, then we should consider the offer. The Rafale did not provide any overwhelming superiority over PAF besides air-to-ground strikes with Scalp missiles. Any procurement of foreign fighter should focus on stealth and superior capabilities. Also, no foreign OEM is going to give us any significant ToT in critical technologies, so the focus should be on the most capable jet on offer.
 
It just makes sense to buy the best until AMCA is ready. F-35 will give India a huge edge in air-to-air and air-to-ground combat.

Let's not forget 5th gen are designed to conduct SEAD operations and precision strikes with JDAMs.
 
F-35 disadvantage:
  1. USA can't be trusted.
  2. Kill switch if any.
  3. USA can sanction anytime.
  4. No indigenous weapon.
  5. Cannot be used against Pakistan.
  6. No local production.
  7. No source.
  8. Cannot match current weaponry.
  9. Cannot use with S-400.
  10. Next USA government came with different plan in next 4 years.
  11. If USA intentionally delaying GE 404 engine, they are highly unreliable, and if they unintentionally do it due to supply chain issue, they are highly inefficient.
Now give me any advantages of it, if any.
Not having F-35 has disadvantages galore:
  1. Bharat will not have its first fifth-generation aircraft until 2040.
  2. In these 15 years, China will have hundreds of J-35/36, and they will rent them freely out to Pakistan. In case of a Sindoor 2.0, IAF may be at a serious disadvantage.
  3. With AMCA flying off the production line in 2040, we will be playing merely a catch-up game as China will have moved on to sixth-generation fighters by then, and so will Pakistan, as they will just keep on getting the latest ones from China free of cost.
  4. In case of a reversal in the battle of airpower during Sindoor 2.0, India's global standing will take a serious hit, and that might constrain us on the world stage.
Therefore, we should go for a couple of squadrons of off-the-shelf F-35s. We should keep MRFA with make-in-India requirements and integration of Indian weapon requirements a parallel process (that will probably go the Rafale way).

It will be nice to have terms and conditions agreed upon, similar to the Israeli F-35 Adir variant. But sealing a two-squadron F-35 deal despite having S-400, Super Sukhoi, etc., will be quite a task.
 
It’s great that they have offered the jet to us but there are a number of questions, problems and issue that will affect us even though it’s purchase cost is low and attractive.

The problem is what type of technology will we get and is it compatible with our existing air force network and net centric warfare, will we be able to install our own indigenous technology and equipment by ourselves, can we customise it to our needs, can we use our indigenous weapons, will we get access to the jets computer, can we manufacture the parts and service the jet for any maintenance indigenously, etc.

The answer is a simple no. While the jet maybe the best in the world the problem is that we would be heavily reliant on the USA for everything from its MRO, technology and weapons which will be very expensive. It’s possible that we can order 1-2 squadrons at most to improve and increase our air power until the indigenous AMCA jet is ready for production which is the next backbone of our air force.
 
Get secure Data link as per our requirement and rest is okay as in network centric warfare , data flow is critical and second is mission planning for such hitech jets. Get Navy 50, Army 100 and Airforce 150 so multiple layers and defensive line of jets are there as it's VSTOl so Army Aviation must come up standard to Handle this .Army must have this and somthing called FARP , forward aircraft. Refulling platforms or mobile refulling stations must be made so then jets can petrol mountains and rugged terrain effectively and use stealth and sensors to see deep into enemy territory and then call in missile strikes or artillery on needed postions. This F35 ,even if 20 in number can supress 1000 km easily so aim for 300 now .
Wtf
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,269
Messages
52,631
Members
3,434
Latest member
Renu Reddy
Back
Top