US Threatens F414 Engine Blockade for Colombia's Gripen E Acquisition, Raising Concerns for India's Tejas Mk2 Export Ambitions

US Threatens F414 Engine Blockade for Colombia's Gripen E Acquisition, Raising Concerns for India's Tejas Mk2 Export Ambitions


The United States has indicated it will block the sale of the General Electric F414-GE-39E engine to Colombia's air force, the Fuerza Aeroespacial Colombiana (FAC). This engine is a crucial part of the Saab Gripen E fighter jet, which Colombia was considering purchasing.

This decision, apparently made to encourage Colombia to buy American-made Lockheed Martin F-16s instead, has wider implications, especially for India's Tejas Mk2 fighter jet program, which uses a variant of the same engine.

Because the US holds significant control over the export of its technology, this action raises questions about the future of India's plans to sell the Tejas Mk2 internationally, particularly to countries that are either aligned with or in competition with American interests.

The F414-GE-39E engine, a modified version of the widely used F414 series, is used in the Gripen E, a light, multi-role fighter aircraft made by Saab in Sweden. Colombia had been looking at the Gripen E to replace its older aircraft.

However, the US veto effectively eliminates this possibility by preventing access to the engine. This is viewed as a strategic move by the US, using its control over vital aerospace components to promote the sale of its own aircraft.

The F414 engine's adaptability and performance have made it essential to many fighter jet programs globally. This includes India's Tejas Mk2, an improved version of the domestically produced Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

The Indian version, called the F414-INS6, is planned to power both the Tejas Mk2 and the first models of the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). Production is planned to take place in India under a technology transfer agreement with General Electric (GE), with 80 percent of the technology being transferred.

The US's decision to stop the engine sale to Colombia has caused concern in India. Indian defence officials are looking at potential export markets for the Tejas Mk2 to support India's defence industry and increase its geopolitical influence.

The Tejas Mk2 is designed to be a cost-effective, single-engine aircraft with advanced avionics and the ability to perform multiple roles. It is being promoted as a strong competitor to aircraft like the Gripen, F-16, and France's Rafale.

Potential buyers include countries in Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America, many of which have friendly relations with the US. However, the situation with Colombia suggests that the US might use its control over the F414 engine to limit India's export opportunities, especially where American companies like Lockheed Martin or Boeing are also competing for contracts.

India's agreement with GE, completed in 2023 after lengthy negotiations, allows HAL to co-produce the F414-INS6 with substantial local involvement. This deal was celebrated as a significant step in US-India defence relations.

Despite this, the agreement is still governed by US export controls under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). This means that Washington has the final say on where the engines, and therefore the Tejas Mk2, can be sold.

The veto on the sale to Colombia demonstrates this power: by denying the F414-GE-39E to Saab, the US has effectively removed a European competitor to favor its own F-16. This leads to a crucial question: could the US place similar limitations on India if the Tejas Mk2 starts competing with American fighter jets in the export market?

The situation is significant for India. The Tejas Mk2, which is expected to be in service by the late 2020s, is a major upgrade from the Mk1. It offers improved payload, range, and combat abilities, making it attractive to countries looking for advanced but affordable fighter jets.

HAL has secured orders for over 100 units domestically, and with increased production capacity, exporting the aircraft is a logical next step. However, the US's power to veto the use of the F414 engine adds uncertainty.

Countries that are allies of the US, or those already using US-made aircraft, might be pressured to avoid the Tejas Mk2 to maintain good relations or avoid a potential engine embargo. Similarly, in direct competitions with American jets, the US could use its ITAR authority to influence the outcome.

This concern is not merely theoretical. Discussions on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have highlighted the potential for the Colombia veto to affect not only the Gripen E but also other aircraft using the F414 engine, like the Tejas Mk2.

While the US has approved the co-production of the engine in India, indicating growing trust, its willingness to allow exports to other countries remains unknown.

Historically, the US has sometimes blocked technology transfers to safeguard its strategic and commercial interests, as seen in past restrictions on allies like Turkey, following its purchase of Russian arms systems.

The US Arms Export Control Act, of which ITAR is a part, gives the US government broad authority to control the export of defence articles and services.
 
India can't even build planes for itself. Whis is HAL going around the world pitching aircraft like the 1A and now 2. I guess its fine dining and 5 star hotels. A private company would never waste resources like this. I guess the politicians can say how good of a job they are doing. Its only the tax payers money. Plus, it will take India 20 years to deliver just to the domestic market. Hopefully, India can design their own engine but, I wouldn't rely on any PSU's.
 
Action generates reactions. Ditching of US$ a prime example. Even the fine diners look at their faces in the mirror. Complete ownership will happen. Before anything is created, thought is required. Before making anything customers lined up. Things are speeding up hopefully the solar flame stays around longer.
 
There, it is. That's why I always say, while choosing a foreign partner for AMCA engine development, it needs to see autonomy.
 
Columbia and India are not same. We can switch jets and engines; we have that liberty. It will take time to alter the design, but it is doable. A lot of guys here wanted F35 straight-up, without purchasing a 4th gen jet 😂. Good luck with that. I don't think we will buy any jet. Even the engine is doubtful.
 
The US is only shooting itself in the foot here.

If the veto is intended as a punishment to Colombia, the latter may well turn to China, and then the US will suddenly have massive Chinese influence in their backyard.

If the veto is just to allow the US to sell their fighters instead, well, they'll Lnly end up pissing off Sweden, South Korea, Turkey, India, etc.

They lose this either way.
 
India needs to keep this blackmail of USA in mind while even thinking about F 35. Its better to go to your old trusted partner than to surrender your sovriegnty. US will never ditch its trusted slave Pakistan.
 
Exactly, they can veto the sale to India and/or demand a 50% increase in the price, as is currently in progress for the GE F414 with 80% ToT for Tejas Mk2 and AMCA Mk1.

And probably is the reason for the delay in F404 for Tejas Mk1A.

Most probable arm-twisting for the sale of F-21 or F-15 or even F-35 for IAF.

We must keep our options open and have our 110kN engine deal decoupled, de-risked from the F404 and F414 deal, with either Safran or Rolls-Royce.

And also, looking at RD33 and AL-31F/41F is a very good idea, really.
 
Even now, India is relying on the US to supply the 404 & 414 engines. It will be a blunder, as America will backstab at the crucial stage. It is backstabbing now, literally, by delaying the engine supply. Have plan B: either Safran/RR, and forget the US.
 
Columbia and India are not same. We can switch jets and engines; we have that liberty. It will take time to alter the design, but it is doable. A lot of guys here wanted F35 straight-up, without purchasing a 4th gen jet 😂. Good luck with that. I don't think we will buy any jet. Even the engine is doubtful.
But Sweden is a NATO member.
 
I don't think anybody in India needs to be concerned about this. By the time HAL completes the order for IAF, GTRE would have developed Kaveri 2 that can power the Tejas MKII. It will take HAL at least 6 to 8 years to complete the order for Tejas Mk1 and Tejas Mk2.
The new engine for the AMCA would also be close to maturing by then.
 
We're missing out on a great opportunity. Integrate Kaveri ASAP with Tejas. For countries like Colombia, their primary adversary is the drug war. They don't need all the bells and whistles. Even if Kaveri is allegedly underpowered, it doesn't matter. They just need to do some basic bombing missions, mostly. So, it doesn't really matter if they are not able to fly at full capacity. So, we will have export money coming in, we will be able to scale it up, put more money into the Kaveri program, and make it better.
 
Even now, India is relying on the US to supply the 404 & 414 engines. It will be a blunder, as America will backstab at the crucial stage. It is backstabbing now, literally, by delaying the engine supply. Have plan B: either Safran/RR, and forget the US.
There is really no other option. We shut down Kaveri in 2007-08. If only GOI and IAF would have funded it. In a true sense, Kaveri is closest to GE F404, though not quite there. Its MTBO and thrust will be inferior. Still, it was and is a viable option down the line.
 
It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.

- Henry Kissinger
 
Taking GE F414 for Tejas Mk2 and AMCA project for a short term measure is a good decision.

Nobody stops India developing its own 90kN Kaveri2 and new joint venture 110kN engines.
 
God knows why HAL selected a USA-based company like GE to supply their engines for its most aspirational projects like Tejas and AMCA, despite knowing fully well the fickle nature of the USA. India could have easily chosen French or Russian engines instead. Moreover, why on Earth can't our IITs, ISRO, DRDO, and HAL all join hands to produce our own fighter jet engine? How long are we going to remain hostage to Western powers?
 
There, it is. That's why I always say, while choosing a foreign partner for AMCA engine development, it needs to see autonomy.
Yes, better give scientists and engineers proper tools instead than be stuck on whims of another country. Further, it is a lot cheaper to develop on own. India can make engines according to the technology it has and not worry about the highest thrust-to-weight ratio. There are plenty of other sources of engines.
 
The US is only shooting itself in the foot here.

If the veto is intended as a punishment to Colombia, the latter may well turn to China, and then the US will suddenly have massive Chinese influence in their backyard.

If the veto is just to allow the US to sell their fighters instead, well, they'll Lnly end up pissing off Sweden, South Korea, Turkey, India, etc.

They lose this either way.
Too late - the Chinese already dominate South America.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,287
Messages
44,013
Members
2,794
Latest member
skumarsblr
Back
Top