With Extended Refueling Cycles, BARC’s 200-MW Reactor to Boost Operational Readiness of India's Next-Gen S-5 and P-77 Subs

With Extended Refueling Cycles, BARC’s 200-MW Reactor to Boost Operational Readiness of India's Next-Gen S-5 and P-77 Subs


In a major step towards strengthening its naval power, India's Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) is developing a new 200-megawatt (MW) nuclear reactor to propel its next generation of submarines.

This powerful reactor is slated for installation in the upcoming S-5 class ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and the six planned Project-77 class nuclear attack submarines (SSNs), representing a quantum leap in the country's indigenous defence capabilities under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.

The new reactor, a pressurized light-water type fueled by enriched uranium, is a substantial upgrade from the 83-MW reactor currently used in the Indian Navy's Arihant-class submarines.

After nearly eight years of development, the design and computer simulation phases for this advanced power plant are complete, paving the way for its production.

A key feature of the reactor is its enhanced fuel efficiency, which will allow for extended refueling cycles of up to ten years. This significantly boosts the submarine's operational availability, as it reduces the lengthy and complex process of refueling, allowing the vessel to spend more time at sea and less time in port.

This advanced reactor system has been designed with the versatility to support two very different mission types.

For the S-5 class SSBNs, which form the core of India's sea-based nuclear deterrent, the reactor will be configured to provide a constant and reliable power supply for extended, stealthy patrols deep in the ocean.

These massive submarines, displacing over 13,000 tons, are designed to carry up to 16 long-range ballistic missiles, ensuring a credible second-strike capability.

In contrast, the Project-77 "hunter-killer" submarines require a reactor that can rapidly change power levels, enabling high speeds and agile manoeuvres to track and engage enemy warships and submarines.

The development of this high-capacity reactor is taking place at a critical time, as India seeks to secure its interests in the increasingly competitive Indo-Pacific region.

The strategic imperative is underscored by the rapid expansion of China’s naval forces, which now operate a large and modern fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.

By equipping its future S-5 and Project-77 submarines with this 200-MW reactor, India aims to field platforms with speed, endurance, and stealth capabilities that are on par with or exceed those of other regional powers.

The increased power will allow these submarines to operate submerged for months at a time, a critical advantage for both strategic deterrence and conventional warfare.

Building on decades of nuclear expertise, BARC has incorporated advanced safety features and noise-reduction technologies into the new reactor's design.

The development has also drawn upon operational experience from the INS Chakra II, a Russian-origin submarine leased by India, which was powered by a 190-MW reactor.

To ensure the system's reliability and safety before it is installed on a submarine, a land-based prototype will be constructed.

This follows the successful model used for the Arihant program, where a shore-based facility at Kalpakkam was used to test the reactor and train naval crews in its operation, ensuring a smooth and secure integration into India's growing nuclear fleet.
 
I think 2 of this type of reactor are enough for a 65-70,000 ton IAC 2. The Navy must think about it.
While two of these reactors may be enough for 60-70 thousand tons carriers, with only two electromagnetic launch systems, unlike American or Chinese carriers with 3-4 EMALS systems, we also have to keep future upgrades in mind, like high-power laser systems and dynamic armour for carriers. These technologies are under development worldwide; for these systems, we need at least 350-400 MW reactors.
 
While two of these reactors may be enough for 60-70 thousand tons carriers, with only two electromagnetic launch systems, unlike American or Chinese carriers with 3-4 EMALS systems, we also have to keep future upgrades in mind, like high-power laser systems and dynamic armour for carriers. These technologies are under development worldwide; for these systems, we need at least 350-400 MW reactors.
Did you know how much power a Nimitz-class carrier's nuclear reactor generates?... 400 MW is enough for a 70,000-ton carrier with 3 EMALS.
 
Why not use two or three such power packs for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers to be developed? Furthermore, this nuclear power pack should be used as an SMR to replace old coal-powered plants. It can also be given to private industries for in-house consumption.
 
I think 2 of this type of reactor are enough for a 65-70,000 ton IAC 2. The Navy must think about it.
And I think the navy should make a 55 to 60 thousand ton carrier as they made INS Vikrant, and INS Vishal is nuclear capable because until IAC 2 is made, INS Vikramaditya is to be retired. After all, it takes a minimum of 12 to 13 years to make and test this type of aircraft.
 
This is a critical and very important engine that we need to quickly and 100% indigenously develop and manufacture. We need to start manufacturing these submarines as they have been developing these submarines for a long time now.

We should also place larger orders and increase the number to st least 8-12 SSN and SSBN each. This will bring economies of scale and make it more affordable and we can make improvements and upgrades as we make them.
 
Did you know how much power a Nimitz-class carrier's nuclear reactor generates?... 400 MW is enough for a 70,000-ton carrier with 3 EMALS.
Nimitz has two A4W reactors which generate a total of 1100 MW (550 each). While this may sound enough for a 100,000-ton carrier, these are old-generation reactors which don't produce enough electricity for future technologies like lasers and dynamic armour. That's why the US Navy rejected these reactors for Ford-class carriers and asked for new reactors which produce enough electricity.
 
Special thanks to our trusted partner RUSSIA who literally helped us in the design & development of our own nuclear reactor by providing know-how. While providing reliable submarines like INS Chakra to understand the exact mechanism of a nuclear-powered submarine's working. Russian help can't be understated.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,666
Messages
59,192
Members
4,260
Latest member
Prashant dwivedi
Back
Top