Opinion With US Engines in Tejas and Zorawar, Trump's 25% Tariff Shock Exposes A Critical Flaw in India's Long-Term Defence and Strategic Autonomy

With US Engines in Tejas and Zorawar, Trump's 25% Tariff Shock Exposes A Critical Flaw in India's Long-Term Defence and Strategic Autonomy


A recent announcement by US President Donald Trump to impose a blanket 25% tariff on Indian goods has sent ripples beyond the economic sphere, exposing a significant vulnerability at the heart of India's national security framework.

The trade threat has renewed urgent discussions within the nation's defence circles about India's substantial reliance on American technology for its most critical military hardware, a dependency that could undermine the country's strategic independence.

For years, India has pursued the goal of ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ or self-reliant India, aiming to build its own defence industrial base.

Despite notable achievements, this ambition is undercut by a crucial reality: many of India’s premier "indigenous" platforms are powered by engines and key components sourced from the United States.

Mr. Trump's aggressive trade stance serves as a potent reminder that when a single foreign partner holds the keys to essential technology, that partnership can transform from a source of strength into a strategic liability.

A Widespread American Footprint in Indian Defence​

The dependence on American propulsion systems extends across all branches of the Indian armed forces, integrated into platforms celebrated as milestones of Indian engineering. This reliance places critical leverage in the hands of the U.S., which could potentially disrupt India's military readiness.

Key examples of this dependency include:
  • Zorawar Light Tank: This agile tank, developed by the DRDO and Larsen & Toubro for high-altitude warfare along the northern borders, runs on a Cummins engine, an American-made power unit. Any restrictions on this engine or its spare parts could impact the army's mountain warfare capabilities.
  • LCA Tejas Fighter Jet: The backbone of India's "indigenous" fighter program, the Tejas Mk1 and its advanced Mk1A variant, are both equipped with the General Electric F404 turbofan engine. This dependency arose after India's own Kaveri engine project faced significant developmental delays.
  • Future Combat Aircraft: The nation's next-generation fighters, the Tejas Mk2 and the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), are also slated to use an American engine: the more powerful General Electric F414. A landmark deal for the co-production of these engines in India by GE and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has been signed, but it still ties India’s future air power to U.S. technology and policy.
  • Naval Warships: The Indian Navy's modern Shivalik-class (Project 17) and Nilgiri-class (Project 17A) stealth frigates use General Electric's LM2500 gas turbines for propulsion. This makes a vital part of the naval fleet dependent on American supply chains for maintenance and support.
These decisions, whether driven by immediate operational needs, the absence of viable domestic alternatives, or bureaucratic delays, have resulted in a strategic contradiction.

While India promotes these platforms as symbols of self-reliance, their core operational ability—their engines—remains controlled by a foreign power.

The primary concern now circulating among policy experts is the potential for the "weaponization" of this supply chain.

In the event of a future diplomatic disagreement or a shift in geopolitical alliances, Washington could halt the supply of critical spare parts, block necessary software upgrades, or deny technical assistance.

Such a move could effectively ground large portions of India's most advanced tanks, warships, and aircraft, leaving the nation's defence posture severely compromised.

This tariff threat has brought this long-term risk into immediate and sharp focus, prompting calls for a renewed strategy to achieve true indigenous capability in defence manufacturing.
 
US has not shifted stand but has realised that we are a potent military power and have made money in Ruso Ukraine war , so it's out to curtail the side effect as Trumph earlier was out to pressure China in his last term ,now his focus is us as we benefited a lot so we need not cry wolf but somehow get the tech in as US is all about money , they will sell their dog if somone offers more so do a deal on engines and end this topic forever .
 
We are nearing completion of 600 and 1500 HP engine testing. It is time to take up the development of 800 and 1000 HP engines for land-based systems and 2400-3000 HP engines for 76(I) submarines.
 
Neither China nor USA dependency is good for a country, and we have seen many examples in just a few weeks. Rare earth, TBM, precision tools, and phosphate fertilizer are some examples. Even if indigenous products are costly and less capable, we should go for them as in the long term, they can be improved and, of course, be much cheaper than depending on other countries. Japan is a good example of this philosophy.
 
Ask RR to build engines compatible with Mk1A, Mk.2 with the same conditions for the AMCA engine: full ToT, full IP/joint IP. Also, tell GE the same thing.
 
Say a big NO to the F-35A fighter jet now. Procure the Su-57 and say that straight to Trump's face: "You have messed up."
 
I don't think it's possible if costs have to be kept down.

Even during the 1990s when US-India relations were not very good, HAL went ahead with getting the GE engine for testing the prototype.
And this anyway seems to be a Trump-specific tantrum. He doesn't have more than four years left anyway unless the term limit law is completely repealed.
It's unreasonable to sabotage the entire partnership that has taken over three decades to build.
 
The real problem is the IAF. They do not want Russian engines at all. Regarding the engine for Tejas Mk 2, the IAF wanted the EJ 2000 engine, but the GE 414 was selected because of low life cycle costs and diplomatic pressure from the US. Besides, Eurojet is a European consortium which includes Germany, and India did not want to rely on most of them, as they are also vulnerable to their internal politics and also US pressure.
 
India only had two choices which was either to pick Russian or USA engines, weapons and equipment etc. This is because the USA had a better, more advanced, proven, reliable and effective technology that they wanted to receive, learn from and in future develop an indigenous alternative engine.

India needs to quickly make the deal for the F414 engines as this is essential and critical for our air force as it will be powered by them. This will help us to develop our own indigenous engine in future.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,190
Messages
56,585
Members
3,942
Latest member
Mohan Kumar L
Back
Top