After First F404 Engine Delivery for Tejas, GE Links Delays to Prior Lack of Consistent Indian Orders, Citing Dormant Supply Chain Reactivation

After First F404 Engine Delivery for Tejas, GE Links Delays to Prior Lack of Consistent Indian Orders, Citing Dormant Supply Chain Reactivation


GE Aerospace delivered the first F404-IN20 engine to Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) on March 25, 2025, marking a key step in the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Mk1A programme. This delivery, part of an order for 99 engines, is crucial for India's indigenous fighter jet initiative.

However, the engine arrived approximately two years later than initially anticipated, prompting GE to highlight that a five-year gap in orders necessitated the complex reactivation of a dormant production line, a process further complicated by the global pandemic.

The F404-IN20 engine is a specific version developed for the LCA Mk1A, an upgraded fighter designed to enhance the Indian Air Force's (IAF) operational capabilities. GE had previously supplied 65 similar engines for the earlier Tejas Mk1 variant, completing those deliveries by 2016.

With no new orders placed between 2016 and 2021, GE halted the F404-IN20 production line. The line was only restarted after HAL secured the order for 99 engines in 2021, following the Indian government's approval of a contract for 83 LCA Mk1A aircraft.

Acknowledging the delay, GE Aerospace noted the inherent difficulties in restarting jet engine manufacturing. In a statement, the company indicated that resuming production was especially challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. The five-year period without orders meant suppliers needed to be re-engaged and the entire supply chain ramped up.

While underscoring its dedication to safety and quality, GE suggested that the lack of continuous orders from India contributed significantly to the extended timeline required to fulfil the new contract.

The delay in engine delivery impacted HAL's production schedule for the 83 LCA Mk1A jets, a contract valued at approximately ₹48,000 crore signed in February 2021. This created concern within the IAF, which is working to modernise its fleet and address a shortfall in squadron numbers (currently reported at around 31 squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42.5).

In late 2024, India invoked a penalty clause against GE due to the delays, although specific financial details have not been disclosed by the government, which described it as a standard contractual procedure.

From GE's perspective, the extended interval between the final engine delivery for the Mk1 in 2016 and the formal contract for the Mk1A engines in 2021 played a crucial role. This gap occurred while specifications and funding for the Mk1A programme were being finalised.

According to GE, this period without orders allowed the specialised production system to become inactive, making the restart process inherently slow and vulnerable to the global supply chain disruptions that arose during the pandemic. Consistent demand, GE implied, could have kept the production line operational, potentially avoiding these restart challenges.

Despite the setbacks, GE has established a delivery plan, aiming to provide 12 engines by December 2025 and increase output to 20 engines per year from 2026 onwards.

HAL has continued its aircraft assembly work, utilizing reserve engines for initial activities, including the first flight of an LCA Mk1A aircraft (tail number LA 5033) in March 2024.

To meet the IAF's requirements, HAL has expanded its production capacity by adding a new facility in Nashik, complementing its existing line in Bengaluru, potentially enabling the production of up to 24 aircraft annually once engine supply stabilises.
 
Who did the delay in finalizing the deal. Govt of India or IAF. Anyone who knows production cycle should have been aware if the line is shut it does not start by switching on. Some people must share this mistake and let India know where this gotala happened.
 
Had GE communicated this upfront, we would understand. But they gleefully took the order, promised untenable timelines and now cribbing.
They communicated this. It was HAL who did not communicate with GE for the planned 83 Mk1A order and only initiated contract negotiation once the deal with IAF was signed. The assembly line was idle for 6 years and HAL did not think to communicate for upcoming orders.

Even now, we have only ordered 99 engines, while we need at least 2 engines per jet in its lifecycle, making a requirement of 120 more with only current and existing jets. With 97 more planned, the total order will easily cross 300 more. HAL could have easily negotiated local assembly and TOT with a 400 order of F404.
 
It requires 3 engines for a plane life cycle. That means another 2 engines per planes need to be ordered for future maintenance. Chances of repeating fiasco are High
 
GEs reason's are not surprising. Recall SIPRI publication India's Ad hoc Arsenal in 1990? When I led 12 country project to study and compare arms procurement decision-making process 1993 to 2000, India did not have processes of long-term planning, programming and budgeting system. It resulted in absence of coordination, consistency and coherence in major arms acquisitions.

Absence of legislative oversight did not enable independent expert assessment of Executive validation of a weapon system, planning, monitoring project milestones, scrutiny of outcomes and standards, project review, thereafter recalibration.

Evidence: Kaveri engine, Vikranth sails without its aircraft complement, GE 404 engines awaited. There are other serious limitations such as monopoly of DRD. Our acquisition process needs both structural and capacity building reforms.
 
Nice face-saving PR from GE Aviation. Before signing the contract, GE had to think about it. They would have avoided it if GE's supply chain were facing challenges.

Why did they sign the deal? It was not forcefully signed, and no one forced GE to sign the contract. It's an international contract. It's HAL who hasn't imposed any penalty on GE. GE should thank HAL for that.

Second, every fighter jet requires 3.5 jet engines in its entire lifespan. GE has supplied engines for 40 Tejas (20 IOC & 20 FOC versions). That means GE, the OEM, has to supply another 100 plus GE-404s, which is a specially developed variant for the Tejas project. GE knew they had to supply 100 plus engines so that these 40 IOC plus FOC remain in the air.

Dassault is making arrangements for 36 Rafale jets that have been bought with 144 engines in the future. That's the difference in professionalism. Not only that, engines need regular overhaul and spares/components, which GE has supplied for 75 GE-404 engines. So, by just supplying engines, GE's responsibility doesn't get over.

On the other hand, Dassault delivered 36 Rafales despite the COVID pandemic. But GE failed completely. After all, a contract is a contract.
Swarajyamag.com reported to get harrasment of the talents to inferior superiors in the Indian institutes especially scientific institutions like HAL and DRDO on Jan 12 and repeated once
 
Nice face-saving PR from GE Aviation. Before signing the contract, GE had to think about it. They would have avoided it if GE's supply chain were facing challenges.

Why did they sign the deal? It was not forcefully signed, and no one forced GE to sign the contract. It's an international contract. It's HAL who hasn't imposed any penalty on GE. GE should thank HAL for that.

Second, every fighter jet requires 3.5 jet engines in its entire lifespan. GE has supplied engines for 40 Tejas (20 IOC & 20 FOC versions). That means GE, the OEM, has to supply another 100 plus GE-404s, which is a specially developed variant for the Tejas project. GE knew they had to supply 100 plus engines so that these 40 IOC plus FOC remain in the air.

Dassault is making arrangements for 36 Rafale jets that have been bought with 144 engines in the future. That's the difference in professionalism. Not only that, engines need regular overhaul and spares/components, which GE has supplied for 75 GE-404 engines. So, by just supplying engines, GE's responsibility doesn't get over.

On the other hand, Dassault delivered 36 Rafales despite the COVID pandemic. But GE failed completely. After all, a contract is a contract.
It is the typically American reation to disown their misdeeds and failure. "Chit Bhi Mera Pot Bhi Mera"!
So we can view their action in the same way... when they ran away from Afghanistan with their tails between their legs leaving behind $7 Billions worth of Arms, Ammunition, Guns, Black Hawk Helicopters, Humvees. What kind of soldiers run away from battle field leaving behind their Weapons?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,435
Messages
48,014
Members
3,011
Latest member
Gokul Pawar
Back
Top