Could India's Brahmos Killer Missile Sink a Chinese Aircraft Carrier?

Could India's Brahmos Killer Missile Sink a Chinese Aircraft Carrier?


Think those giant aircraft carriers, the ones that look like floating cities, are invincible? Well, India's got a weapon that might just change the game. It's called the BrahMos, and it's a supersonic cruise missile – picture a rocket so fast, it practically screams across the ocean. Military simulations are showing that it wouldn't even take many of these bad boys to cause some major damage, even sinking a massive Chinese aircraft carrier.

Why is this missile so scary? Speed. The BrahMos clocks in at a whopping three times the speed of sound, and it zips along just above the waves, making it a sneaky little devil that's tough to shoot down. To make things worse (if you're on a carrier), it packs a serious punch. You don't want to get hit by one of these.

Of course, in the real world, things aren't as simple as a computer simulation. Carriers have defenses, lots of them. Missiles meant to blast incoming threats out of the sky, radar watching everywhere… there's a reason these floating fortresses are so hard to take down. Whether the BrahMos could break through all that is a question no one really wants to find the answer to the hard way.

One thing is for sure, though: missiles like the BrahMos are changing the way we think about naval power. It's not just about who has the biggest ship anymore; it's about who has the smartest, fastest, and most powerful weapons. And in that race, India's definitely looking dangerous.
 
Dunno about Brahmos but P800 has actually crippled down Air Defenses in Ukraine.
 
I am sure a salvo (4 to 6 fired) of Brahmos can sink a chinese carrier, but the question is not the just the missiles capability, but how do we vector these missiles while tracking the carrier in real time...ISR and real time tracking needs to be done in a distributed/networked way in a contested environment that includes - drones, airborne radars, in alignment with VLEO/LEO sensors...Drones, AWACS we have and should have more soon with MQ9s, Netra-Mk2s, but we lack a VLEO/LEO constellation (backed up with MEO/GEO/EEO) which should be a focus for deployment at least with initial operational capability over the subcontinent latest by 2030 (need about 500-1000 satellites with replenishment of about 250+ per year, assuming a lifespan of 4 years; launching 1000 satellites will take us at 4-5 years with 10 dedicated PSLV/GSLV launches per year of 20-25 satellites per launch)...we have the capability, but need the funds and formal approvals...a VEO/LEO constellation should be dual use and also managed jointly...we must learn from SpaceX's starlink and starshield...India must have VLEO/LEO sensors to dominate IOR (Red Sea to Malacca) to start with.
 
We should quickly work on Brahmos-2, with a range of 1000+KMs with a speed of Mach 8+, but a smaller size so they can be launched either from fighters and/or like rapid dragon from C-130s.C-295s and C-17s...Let us buy the Zircon tech to start with and then develop our own.
 
If the missile hits the ship below waterline, one missile is more than enough to sink the ship. Ship will sink within minutes.
 
3 BrahMos hits, unless they happen to hit in exactly the right places and under the right circumstances, won't sink a carrier. That said, 3 hits would be sufficient to mission-kill said carriers, if not cripple it.

However, any carrier would have its own CBG escorting it. Factoring that in along with potential interception rates, we could need anything between 15-ish all the way to around 60 missiles (assuming an effective hit rate of between 5% and 20%), though a practical number there sounds in the range of 40-50 missiles.
 
If the missile hits the ship below waterline, one missile is more than enough to sink the ship. Ship will sink within minutes.
Generally, no. A single underwater hit can sink a massive ship like a carrier, but for that to happen, you would need the missile to hit at an extremely inopportune time and place for the carrier. As such, it wouldn't be the missile itself that would sink the carrier, but rather the secondary fires, explosion, etc. that the missile would cause. Still, it's a one-in-a-thousand chance at best.
 
India needs an indigenous constellation of LEO satellites viz Starlinks so that we can have eyes in the sky for 24 hrs to have real time surveillance of places of interests around the world. Even the next gen NAVIC needs to be micro satellite based.
 
In reality PLAN will start intercepting them much before they come within their SAM threshold using their PL-15s. BrahMos doesn't have any RAM coating, neither does it maneuver in the mid-phase, nor does it employ EW like a fighter aircraft.

They also travel very fast, making them appear as a bigger target to a radar coming from the opposite direction. So hitting them with BVR won't be too hard. This scenario was aptly showcased in a video of Grim Reapers.

I suggest the following improvements in BrahMos :
  1. Greater Speed ~Mach 4.8
  2. RAM Coating
  3. Stand-in GaN Jammer
  4. Chaff & Flare Dispensing
  5. GaN AESA Seeker
 
In reality PLAN will start intercepting them much before they come within their SAM threshold using their PL-15s. BrahMos doesn't have any RAM coating, neither does it maneuver in the mid-phase, nor does it employ EW like a fighter aircraft.

They also travel very fast, making them appear as a bigger target to a radar coming from the opposite direction. So hitting them with BVR won't be too hard. This scenario was aptly showcased in a video of Grim Reapers.

I suggest the following improvements in BrahMos :
  1. Greater Speed ~Mach 4.8
  2. RAM Coating
  3. Stand-in GaN Jammer
  4. Chaff & Flare Dispensing
  5. GaN AESA Seeker
U haven't saw how Chinese radars wasn't been able to track brahmos
 
So many defence experts in the comment section.🤣
 
We dont need 3, we just need 1 - One Brahmos on the carrier would blow a big hole - it will render the carrier inoperational and take months to repair. They will be lucky if they can tow that multi billion dollar embarrassment back to their homebase. I say use only one - the hole will create such an embarrassment for Xi, that his underlings will topple him and throw the country into civil war.

(side note- Fujian is a delicate toy. Just a slight explosion -like Shahed 136 style- on the EMALS rail would render it inoperational. )
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,121
Messages
18,960
Members
813
Latest member
Youraj Gavate
Back
Top