Opinion How Tejas Mk2 and AMCA Success Hinges on IAF's Direct Involvement in Development and Overcoming Bureaucratic Hurdles

tejas-mk2-and-amca-webp.851


India's aspirations for self-reliance in fighter aircraft technology rest heavily on the success of its indigenous Tejas Mk2 and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programs.

However, these programs, currently under the purview of civilian agencies, have been hampered by delays and a disconnect between development and operational needs. To truly unlock their potential, the Indian Air Force (IAF) needs to take the reins and drive these projects forward with a clear operational focus.

While the Tejas Mk2 and AMCA hold the promise of transforming the IAF into a modern, self-reliant force, their development has been hindered by bureaucratic red tape, insufficient accountability, and a lack of urgency inherent in civilian-led projects.

The IAF, as the end-user, has often found itself relegated to the role of a mere customer, lacking adequate control over timelines and specifications. This disconnect has led to delays and aircraft that sometimes fall short of meeting the IAF's evolving operational requirements.

To overcome these challenges, a compelling case exists for the IAF to assume direct ownership of these critical programs. This shift would bring a much-needed sense of urgency and operational focus to the development process. The IAF's direct involvement in project management would enable the establishment of firm deadlines, implementation of robust monitoring mechanisms, and proactive mitigation of delays.

This approach is mirrored in countries with successful military aviation programs, such as the United States and France, where the armed forces play a central role in aircraft development. Programs like the F-35 Lightning II and Rafale have thrived under continuous user feedback and oversight, ensuring alignment with real-world requirements and timelines.

Civilian agencies, while possessing technical expertise, often lack the intimate understanding of battlefield dynamics and the rapidly evolving threats that fighter jets are designed to counter. By taking charge, the IAF can ensure that the Tejas Mk2 and AMCA are tailored to its specific operational needs from the outset.

This is particularly crucial for the AMCA, envisioned as a fifth-generation stealth fighter, where critical aspects like weapon compatibility, mission configurations, and survivability must be aligned with the IAF's evolving doctrine and strategic goals.

Historically, the IAF has been a passive recipient of aircraft, often forced to adapt its operations to fit available platforms rather than having platforms designed to meet its specific needs. This dynamic needs to change. By taking control, the IAF can become a proactive stakeholder, fostering a culture of accountability and shared responsibility where all involved parties are aligned towards delivering results.

The IAF's decades of experience in operating and maintaining a diverse fleet of fighter jets, from Russian-origin Su-30MKIs to French-made Rafales, provides it with invaluable operational knowledge. By embedding its personnel in the decision-making process, the IAF can ensure that lessons learned from past experiences are directly applied to new designs, minimizing potential pitfalls and maximizing operational effectiveness.

Handing over the Tejas Mk2 and AMCA programs to the IAF would mark a paradigm shift in India's approach to indigenous defence manufacturing. By becoming both the user and the program leader, the IAF can ensure adherence to timelines, prioritization of operational requirements, and the development of a fighter fleet capable of meeting future challenges. This shift would not only benefit the IAF but also contribute significantly to India's broader goal of achieving self-reliance in defence technology.
 
Excellent point. The programs would benefit from having the IAF lead them, but the civilian agencies will still be needed in a non-supervisory capacity since they are the ones who have some experience in designing aircraft, little as that may be.
 
It may increase chances of Arjun like projects. First they gave such requirements that the tank became heavy. Once it became heavy they rejected it. Import zindabad.
 
It may increase chances of Arjun like projects. First they gave such requirements that the tank became heavy. Once it became heavy they rejected it. Import zindabad.
IAF will keep changing requirements until HAL goes into depression, shutdown and run, as if IAF knows the technical stuff.
 
This thought process is a dangerous activity and that works against Indian interests.
Actually this is to make these company as suppliers for foreign cmpanies and foreign companies will mak the aircrafts.

Existing Government decision is 100% ideal and this should never be changed.
Complex defense corporate industry of the world, has many facets and giving these companies the power of decision making will make these companies fall under those facets. This in turn, makes our Indian assets to work agianst Indian Government and Indian tax money.

One has to realize , in the past decade, because of so much media tactics, people/media/technologists/politicians were mesmerized and more than a trillion dollars of foreign exchange India lost and India gained nothing in return against China for any tactical advantage.

So, these kind of facets will pose a dangerous challenges to India.
So, Indian media, should be too careful when they see any narrative built up outside India when they are taking forward to Indian websites and Indian audience.
 
Has anybody prevented IAF to take the initiative? Everybody is in own comfort zone..IAF, MOD, GOI are okay with all the delays, cost over runs, all the mess but unwilling to challenge outdated processes & procedures
 
Let IAF take the call, cabinet should not intervene unless the procurement causes anything wrong.
 
How is IAF taking charge of Tejas program going to make a difference that it cannot already make being part of the same government entity? Highly unlikely, but privatizing Tejas production may be the best option. Let them make some money in the process.
 
The DRDO, HAL, and other defense PSUs and ordnance factories do not like officers in uniform in their fiefdom as they do not want to share the spoils. A brilliant naval officer, Cmde Paulraj of international fame, who designed the famous APSOH sonar and set up the AI lab of DRDO, was hounded by the civilian scientists, forced to leave, and went to America where he worked in Stanford University and was instrumental in the 4G protocol. Officers on deputation are sent for three years but hardly allowed to work and excel. The head of Pratt and Whitney is an Indian who designed the F-35 engine and was hounded out of IIT Madras. The entrenched bureaucratic scientist-controlled mafia does not let talent flourish as they themselves are incompetent desk babus, excelling in producing low-quality work and duplication of technologies already developed by other countries.
 
Instead of the HAL LCA MK-2 project of 220+ jet fighters, handover to (Tata/Adani + L&T + Bharat Forge/Reliance Defence) type private players who can conglomerate with other foreign players with vast experience and knowledge to expedite the process.

HAL is already overloaded with 183 LCA MK1A + 40 trainer aircraft + MMRCA of 114 + 100 TEDBF + 120 AMCA and 200+12 Su-30MKI + 84 Super Sukhoi & 150+ different types of helicopters like LCH Prachand, Rudra, Dhruv, etc.

The only way for the government to boost jet aircraft manufacturing in India is to create competition among different manufacturing units, like the USA & China are doing. BrahMos India is a good example of making high-end technology cruise missiles for the IAF and exporting them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,391
Messages
33,746
Members
2,053
Latest member
abdullahkhan
Back
Top