In the Age of Rafale and Tejas, IAF Doesn't Need 42-Squadron Strength to Counter China-Pakistan Simultaneously, Says Ex-Air Marshal

fotojet-9.jpg


The Indian Air Force's (IAF) long-held goal of achieving a 42-squadron strength, a benchmark set in the 1980s to counter a simultaneous two-front war with China and Pakistan, may no longer be necessary, according to Air Marshal Anil Khosla (Retd.), former Vice Chief of Air Staff.

In a recent interview on The Gaurav Arya Podcast, Khosla argued that advancements in aviation technology and the changing geopolitical landscape have significantly altered India's defense needs.

The 42-squadron figure was initially conceived when the IAF relied on aircraft with limited capabilities. The 1962 war with China and subsequent conflicts with Pakistan highlighted the need for a large number of aircraft to compensate for their shorter ranges, smaller payloads, and less sophisticated technology. This ensured operational continuity with enough aircraft for rotation, maintenance, and to account for combat losses.

However, the IAF has since modernized its fleet with aircraft like the Sukhoi Su-30MKI, Dassault Rafale, and HAL Tejas. These advanced jets boast superior speed, agility, and avionics, including cutting-edge radar systems and precision-guided munitions.

"Today's fighters can perform air-to-air combat, ground strikes, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare missions, often in a single sortie," Khosla explained, emphasizing the multi-role capabilities of modern aircraft. This versatility allows the IAF to achieve greater operational effectiveness with fewer aircraft.

Citing the Rafale as an example, Khosla highlighted its ability to conduct deep strikes, engage in dogfights, and perform maritime missions. Similarly, the Su-30MKI, the IAF's mainstay fighter, is capable of long-range strikes, air defense, and close air support. The indigenous Tejas Mk1A, though still in its early stages of induction, is expected to further enhance the IAF's multi-role capabilities.

IAF's current squadron strength, which stands at approximately 30-32, falling short of the 42-squadron target. This deficit is attributed to the phasing out of older MiG-21 and MiG-27 aircraft without timely replacements. Delays in the Tejas Mk1A program and the slow pace of acquiring additional Rafales have compounded the issue. Furthermore, reliance on aging platforms like the MiG-29 and Jaguar, which require extensive maintenance and upgrades, adds to the strain on the IAF.

While the 42-squadron goal may be outdated, the IAF still faces challenges in maintaining a sufficient number of state of the art squadrons to effectively address its current security needs. Balancing the induction of new-generation fighters with the modernization of existing fleets remains crucial for the IAF to maintain its combat readiness in a rapidly evolving geopolitical environment.
 
That is a pure nonsense when we know that Chinese military hardware is vastly inferior. Previously they had numbers advantage but that Advantage is gone as equal number of Indian troops have reached deep in the Himalayas with improved road structure.
Did you check Chinese Military hardware personally to conclude it is vastly inferior.
 
China cannot bring everything they have to the Himalayas. They have 80% of their obligation in China Sea against Taiwan, US, Phillipines, Vietnam, Japan. They just cannot abondon those fronts.
India remains the strongest opponent of China, omg the countries sharing it's border, in terms of military and economic strength. So China will want to deploy most of their military resources in defense/ offense against India..Philipines , Vietnam's donot matter to China that much.
 
India remains the strongest opponent of China, omg the countries sharing it's border, in terms of military and economic strength. So China will want to deploy most of their military resources in defense/ offense against India..Philipines , Vietnam's donot matter to China that much.
Where in Himalayas/Tibet Chinese will confront. It has 300,000 Chinese troops spread over three thousand miles in Tibet. Tibet cannot support more than that. There are 8 Himalayan passes, where troops from both sides can ingress. These are all occupied by India. Hence how does China invaded India. Reading too much Global Times.
 
Did you check Chinese Military hardware personally to conclude it is vastly inferior.
Why do I have to check it personally. Anybody who has bought it has regretted it. It is cheap hence they buy and result it that most of the time, it is under repair.
 
Why do I have to check it personally. Anybody who has bought it has regretted it. It is cheap hence they buy and result it that most of the time, it is under repair.
Chinese never export the products that their military use, they only export cheap products.
 
Why only 42 squadrons.The establishment policy should be reviewed and revised vis a vis china who is having a very large numbers of fighters.
 
we need 60-80 squadrons practically, best option is to make 250 MIG-35, make few more squadrons of SU-30, make 150-200 single engine jets like F16 Block 72 or Gripen-E and retire all the old jets.
250 Mig-35s, ~~ few sqns of Su-30s, 200 of F-16s etc etc; Sirji, you missed Rafales..; ?? you know if it happens, it means once orders are placed for the 1st lot in the next 5 years .. it will take 25 years to complete ..
 
Chinese never export the products that their military use, they only export cheap products.
Actually, very true.. so does UK, France, Russia, USa etc etc; No country will export their version.. always watered down eqpt.. What we have is and cannot be better than that of original home country eqpt;
 
Unmanned aerial platforms and long range precision strike capabilities , is the need of hour. Our current strength is in no way inferior , and course of future combat has drastically altered . Though china has more numbers of fighters , with alleged superior avionics, which in any way is dubious , going by past accounts , it lacks long range air platforms to cover the deep bases in india. We are bolstering our forward land bases in northeast , and they pose a significant vulnerability to the chinese industrial -military complex in southern China.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,407
Messages
33,630
Members
2,044
Latest member
ku.nj727
Back
Top