India Recalibrates 114 Jets MRFA Tender, Eyeing to Reduce Rafale F4 Jet Purchase to 60 for Interim 5th-Gen Stealth Jets

India Recalibrates 114 Jets MRFA Tender, Eyeing to Reduce Rafale F4 Jet Purchase to 60 for Interim 5th-Gen Stealth Jets


In a major strategic shift, India's Ministry of Defence is restructuring its plan to acquire 114 new fighter jets.

The revised approach aims to address the immediate operational needs of the Indian Air Force (IAF) by splitting the procurement between advanced 4.5-generation aircraft and new 5th-generation stealth fighters.

This move is designed as an interim measure to bolster air power while awaiting the development of India's indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA).

The original Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program, which was planned as a global competition, is now expected to be pursued through a direct Government-to-Government (G2G) agreement.

Under this new framework, official sources indicate the order will likely be divided, with a potential purchase of 60 Rafale F4 fighters from France and another 60 units of a 5th-generation stealth platform from a different international partner.

A G2G procurement model is often favoured for simplifying and accelerating defence deals.

The primary reason for this strategic pivot is to prevent a critical capability gap in the IAF, which is currently operating with approximately 31 squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42.

Relying solely on the development timeline for the indigenous AMCA, being developed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), was seen as a potential risk.

Acquiring a foreign-made 5th-generation fighter is viewed as a strategic stopgap that will allow the IAF to gain crucial operational experience with stealth technology and deter regional threats.

While no specific stealth fighter has been selected, potential global contenders include the American F-35 and Russia's Su-75 Checkmate.

A central element of this revised plan is a strong emphasis on the 'Make in India' initiative. The Ministry of Defence will require the French manufacturer, Dassault Aviation, to establish partial assembly operations in India even for a reduced order of 60 Rafales. This aligns with the recent contract awarded to Tata Advanced Systems Ltd (TASL) to manufacture complete fuselages for the Rafale in India.

Furthermore, the IAF is expected to push for the integration of more Indian-made systems, such as advanced avionics, electronic warfare (EW) suites, and weaponry, which will help lower costs and enhance the domestic defence industry.

This updated approach diverges from Dassault Aviation's earlier position, which sought a firm commitment for at least 110 aircraft to make a full-scale Indian production line economically viable.

However, defence officials are exercising fiscal caution due to substantial upcoming investments in indigenous platforms. The government is already committed to procuring over 337 locally-made aircraft, including the Tejas Mk1A, the more capable Tejas Mk2, and eventually, at least 120 units of the AMCA, which will require significant budgetary allocation.

Ultimately, this mixed acquisition strategy creates a more resilient and modern roadmap for the IAF. By combining a proven 4.5-generation platform like the Rafale F4 with a next-generation stealth fighter, the air force can modernise its fleet more rapidly, ensure continuity in its operations, and foster a smoother technological transition for the eventual induction of the AMCA, which is anticipated to enter service by the mid-2030s.
 
I don't think Naval LCA can take off from aircraft carrier with Brahmos NG. It can barely manage to take off with 2 BVR missiles and half the fuel capacity.
Possible due to small size, take off is possible but arrester assisted return landing with missiles in center pylon is surely a risk to be clear about.LCA Naval must be but surely made as jets that can land or take from sea based platforms are always a problem for any opposing Navy.
 
India should buy hornet or gripen , along with f35 at fly away condition. Budget should be increased. We are already having a deal on 414 engine. We will have same engine for AMCA initial batches, tejas mark 2 and MRFA , and tedbf which will be huge advantage.
Very difficult choice in F-35. USA is proving to be unreliable partner and 414 deal hasn't been finalised yet. With high maintenance cost of F-35 it needs robust spares availability making it difficult to make a decision on f-35.

I don't know what will happen. If USA shows seriousness and respect for India and its needs them F-35 can be a good stopgap option, specially the Navy variant to have operational synergy with QUAD.

Just my thoughts. I don't know much about India's need and resources available when it comes to 5th gen available currently
 
India shouldn’t make any foreign expensive imports at all. We should focus more on developing and manufacturing the Tejas MK1A in large numbers. We should also quickly manufacture the Tejas MK2 and the AMCA prototypes which are desperately needed to carry out a lot of tests. Once they complete, pass and certify the technology then large scale manufacturing can take place.
Tejas MK1A has a combat range with 500km with limited payload during combat whereas Rafale has a combat range of 1500km while carrying 6.5+ tons of weapon payload.
Tejas MK2 still on paper as no prototype yet.
Large number of similar platforms with inadequate range don't increase your combat scenario as they will be back soon for maintenance.
IAF should opt for:
64 Rafale F4/F5
64 F35/Su57
Upgrade 180 Su30 MKI
Indigenous upgrades for 50+ Mirage 2000 & 50+ Mig29
 
MRFA should be canceled permanently, and we should go for 36 Rafales, 36 Super Sukhois, and 36 SU-57s.
Again and again we seem to be be fondly attached to Rafaels after few disappointing experiences in sharing technologies and accommodating to IAF's request to incorporate Indian technologies in Rafael fighters. In my opinion Su 57E's are not tried and tested stealth 5th gen fighter aircrafts. I am sceptical how Su 57 is a formidable 5th gen fighter much to Russians hype of its air superiority. Not many Asian or money bags Arab countries have shown interest in Su 57 except for one north African country. So India a country which has produced several advanced technology military hardwares buying Su 57 is a bad decision. Of course I am not suggesting F35 which will put India even in a more difficult situation dealing with the Americans. The Americans portray that they are more accommodating to India in military cooperation. But they are known for playing double game suit their dirty politics. Indian bureaucrats should play their game intelligently to the Americans powerful political and military influences. The maintenance costs to fly and operate F35 is even more to sustain in the long run. Now I feel Indians don't have to unduly panic due to pakis soon will be acquiring chinese 5th gen fighter to suggest that India should also procure 5th gen fighters. India should look for suitable 4.5 gen fighters with incorporating with more advanced electronic warfare suites and BVRAAM. Of obviously minus stealth features something we have to compromise for our blunders in the producing Tejas variants progressively.

Now we are disappointingly stuck with Tejas Mk1A, can you imagine the mess we are in? So it's are own doings we are in a miserable state which has put us in a desperate condition. Therefore In my opinion I would suggest we should go for Typhoon instead of panicking and desperate for 5th gen fighter.

Even turkey which has KAAN is not paranoid and rushing to buy 5th gen fighter. They are taking their time to test KAAN for optimum results before inducting in turkish air force. For now the Turkish are settling for 4.5 gen Euro fighter Thypoon.

The situation we are in now strongly demands the need to procure long overdue 114 MRFA. After more than two decades the government is still miserably dragging its feet to decide on a MRFA deal, it's really pathetic. After Kaveri's failures the government and GTRE should have collaborated with a foreign partner in engine technology long ago. Long delays and poor planning, forecast, management failures and bad decisions are the reasons we are many years lagging behind in our progress and growth.
 
@Hari Sud
Great Move, having benefits at the same time building on knowledge gained to improve on the AMCA. The Su57 looks attractive with existing Su30 manufacturing and assembly lines already in place in India and ToT coming with it , assuring the Aircraft arriving earlier to the End User.🍷🍷🍷🙏🙏🙏
 
India Shall buy 60 su57 off the shelf in fly away condition and collaborate with Rafael for 60 Rafael f5 long term production plan in India or India Shall buy 54 Rafeal f4 in fly away condition and go with long term production of 60 su57
 
India Shall buy 60 su57 off the shelf in fly away condition and collaborate with Rafael for 60 Rafael f5 long term production plan in India or India Shall buy 54 Rafeal f4 in fly away condition and go with long term production of 60 su57
There aren't 60 Su57 with Russian forces themselves
 
Tejas MK1A has a combat range with 500km with limited payload during combat whereas Rafale has a combat range of 1500km while carrying 6.5+ tons of weapon payload.
Tejas MK2 still on paper as no prototype yet.
Large number of similar platforms with inadequate range don't increase your combat scenario as they will be back soon for maintenance.
IAF should opt for:
64 Rafale F4/F5
64 F35/Su57
Upgrade 180 Su30 MKI
Indigenous upgrades for 50+ Mirage 2000 & 50+ Mig29
Good point but limited combat range primarily leads to need for frequent aerial refueling rather than maintenance which actually is a factor of fleet utilisation or the number of flight hours actually clocked by the jets and the operating environment. For instance, carrier based Naval jets usually need more care and maintenance; especially to prevent rusting from harsh salt water environment despite the recent transition towards increased use of composites than metal in airframe structures; than Air Force jets. Also, for reference, a USAF C-130J needs 27 hours of on-ground maintenance for every flight hour! Just adding in for the collective good...no offence or one-upmanship intended here. Thanks!
 
Why not buy 114 5th-gen jets? The Chinese have 200 J-20s. We have Tejas Mk2, which will be the same as Rafale. The problem is Rafale’s timeline; it will almost be the same as Tejas Mk2, so why the duplication?
Tejas mark1A is not in production and Tejas Mark2 proto is not ready. Engine supply depends on US. In such condition its crucial to fill the gap and parallel development of own indigenous Engine for self reliant.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,100
Messages
55,939
Members
3,861
Latest member
BALRAM
Back
Top