Indian Navy Fears INS Vikramaditya Retirement by 2037 Unless Structural Audit Permits Life Extension

INS-Vikramaditya.webp


The future of the Indian Navy’s premier aircraft carrier, INS Vikramaditya, appears increasingly uncertain. Naval sources indicate that the 45,000-tonne vessel, which has served as the cornerstone of India’s maritime power since its commissioning in 2013, may face retirement as early as 2037.

This potential decommissioning depends on the results of a critical structural audit scheduled for 2035, which will determine if the Soviet-era hull can safely endure another 15 years of active service.

The Looming Structural Assessment​

The decision to extend the carrier's life to 2052 rests on a comprehensive technical evaluation. While the ship underwent a massive $2.35 billion refurbishment before joining the Indian fleet, the core hull dates back to 1982.

Experts warn that despite extensive modernization of its systems, the steel structure remains a "Soviet relic" susceptible to metal fatigue and corrosion, particularly in the warm, saline waters of the Indian Ocean.

The 2035 audit will likely employ advanced non-destructive testing methods. This includes ultrasonic hull scanning and AI-driven fatigue modelling—a technology increasingly adopted by modern navies to create "digital twins" of ageing ships.

These digital models simulate stress points and predict structural failures before they occur, allowing engineers to calculate the precise risks of extending the vessel's lifespan.

Economic and Strategic Dilemmas​

The financial implications of keeping INS Vikramaditya operational are stark. A projected mid-life upgrade (MLU) could involve costs comparable to building a brand-new vessel

Estimates for a 2025 refit alone stand at approximately ₹1,207 crore ($145 million) for basic avionics and sensor updates. However, a full life-extension program—requiring deep hull strengthening, steel renewal, and propulsion modernization—could cost three times that amount.

Sources suggest that if the structural integrity is found wanting, the investment would be economically unviable. "In ten years, we will assess if the ship can be upgraded in India. If the costs eclipse the price of a new build, we may have to retire her," a defence official noted.

This reality places pressure on the Navy's long-term planning, specifically regarding the proposed Indigenous Aircraft Carrier-2 (IAC-2). Facing budget constraints and urgent timelines, the Navy is reportedly pivoting from a larger 65,000-tonne "supercarrier" design to a repeat order of the Vikrant-class carrier to ensure no capability gap emerges when Vikramaditya retires.

A Troubled Legacy: The Kiev-Class Curse​

INS Vikramaditya belongs to the Soviet Kiev-class of "heavy aviation cruisers," a lineage notorious for short operational lives and structural deficiencies.
  • INS Vikramaditya (ex-Baku/Admiral Gorshkov): The only operational survivor of the class. It suffered repeated boiler failures during sea trials in 2012 due to faulty thermal insulation and has experienced fire incidents during its Indian service.
  • Kiev & Minsk: Both were decommissioned prematurely in 1993 after less than 20 years of service. They were sold to China to become theme parks. Notably, the Minsk was recently severely damaged by a massive fire in August 2024 while awaiting renovation.
  • Novorossiysk: Scrapped in 1997 after suffering a major engine room fire, serving for only roughly 11 years.
This historical context highlights the inherent risks of operating second-hand platforms.

Unlike US Navy supercarriers like the USS Nimitz, which was designed for a 50-year service life, the Kiev-class hulls were not built with such longevity in mind.

Operational History​

Originally commissioned into the Soviet Navy in 1987 as Admiral Gorshkov, the ship served as a Cold War flagship before being mothballed in 1996 due to Russia's post-Soviet financial crisis.

India acquired the vessel in 2004, initiating a protracted and expensive conversion from a hybrid cruiser-carrier to a pure Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery (STOBAR) carrier.

Since its Indian commissioning in 2013, Vikramaditya has logged over 100,000 nautical miles, proving its worth in major exercises like Malabar and conducting patrols during tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

However, as it approaches its 43rd year since launch, the physical limits of its Cold War-era design are becoming impossible to ignore.

Key Timeline: The Path to 2037​

YearEventDetails
1979–1982ConstructionLaid down as Baku at Mykolaiv Shipyard, Ukraine.
1987Soviet ServiceCommissioned as Admiral Gorshkov; served in the Northern Fleet.
1996DecommissioningMothballed by Russia following the Soviet collapse.
2004India DealIndia signs $1.5 billion refit deal; project plagued by delays.
2013Indian InductionCommissioned as INS Vikramaditya on 16 November.
2025Interim RefitEstimated ₹1,207 crore upgrade for sensors and avionics.
2035Critical AuditStructural assessment to decide on life extension to 2052.
2037Potential RetirementLikely decommissioning date if structural audit fails.
 
It's a defunct ship since long , so get rid of it or make it a landing takeoff practice vessel near shore .For combat purposes this ship Admiral Groshkov is over long ago but we made it ours so time to finish it.
 
Focus on AIP, SSK and SSN Submarines for now...target their completion first.

Aircraft carriers do have their utility, but currently our biggest issue is underwater launch variants. We would anyway have to start working on INS Vishal from 2030 onwards, which will take atleast 10 years to complete and by then TEDBF will also be in operation (hopefully).
 
Till then we should make 65000 ton electric powered AC before 2032 and 75000- 80000 ton nuclear powered AC till 2037 !
 
Dhall mey kush kala kala dista hai. All of these judgements are based on us having to fork out $145 million ? Even $450 million is peanuts compared to our $2.35 billion refurbishment capital outlay in 2013, don't you think so ? Then the cream on top is the fumbling about the escalating costs if carried out elsewhere. About new fatigue judging techniques. Scraping it would enrich those seeking older metals and rare earth materials cheaply. There's an enterprising trade in scooping up shipwrecks for older metals recovery. Pakistan and Turkey are major ship breaking locations. Chinese trawlers drag fish the oceans to gain insight of proper locations before secret salvaging happens.
Ram kare aise ho jaye tumri nindiya vaadi jaye
 
It's a defunct ship since long , so get rid of it or make it a landing takeoff practice vessel near shore .For combat purposes this ship Admiral Groshkov is over long ago but we made it ours so time to finish it.
Desh O mera Desh
Do Do paise koh bech theh hain
Ek sofa keh liye ?
 
Focus on AIP, SSK and SSN Submarines for now...target their completion first.

Aircraft carriers do have their utility, but currently our biggest issue is underwater launch variants. We would anyway have to start working on INS Vishal from 2030 onwards, which will take atleast 10 years to complete and by then TEDBF will also be in operation (hopefully).
Slash and burn agriculture is practiced by those who don't own the land. We own our fields and keep them fertile.
 
Till then we should make 65000 ton electric powered AC before 2032 and 75000- 80000 ton nuclear powered AC till 2037 !
Certificates hanging on walls are useless if one can't comprehend that sugar doesn't cause diabetes but is required for staying healthy.
Someone's money will be paying for those dreams if and when they eventuate. Unless it's all part of a bandwagon meant for fooling.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
6,128
Messages
61,288
Members
4,483
Latest member
Dr.Sibram nisonko
Back
Top