India’s Upcoming Project-77 Subs to Feature Manned-Unmanned Teaming, Serving as Mothership for Unmanned Subs Like JALKAPI-XLUUV

India’s Upcoming Project-77 Subs to Feature Manned-Unmanned Teaming, Serving as Mothership for Unmanned Subs Like JALKAPI-XLUUV


In a major enhancement of its naval capabilities, India has formally approved Project-77, a strategic programme to design and build a new class of indigenous nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs).

The project, which received final clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) in October 2024, will introduce advanced underwater warfare technology, including a pioneering concept where the submarine will act as a mothership for large unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs).

The initial phase of the project sanctions the construction of two SSNs, with a long-term plan for a fleet of six such submarines to be operational by the mid-2030s.

This initiative is seen as a critical step in modernising the Indian Navy and strengthening its underwater combat arm, addressing the growing complexity of the maritime security environment in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).

Advanced Capabilities and Self-Reliance​

The submarines developed under Project-77 are set to be formidable platforms, with a planned displacement of nearly 10,000 tonnes.

Each vessel will be powered by a 190-megawatt pressurised light-water reactor developed domestically by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), enabling a top speed of over 30 knots (approximately 56 km/h).

The project, with a stated goal of 95% indigenous content and an initial budget of around ₹40,000 crore (approx. US$4.7 billion) for the first two units, is a significant milestone for India's Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) policy in national defence.

These submarines will be equipped for a wide array of missions, including anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare, intelligence gathering, surveillance, and land-attack strike missions.

A New Era of Underwater Warfare​

A defining feature of the Project-77 submarines will be their ability to operate in conjunction with unmanned systems.

The submarine will function as a command-and-control "mothership," deploying and coordinating a team of large UUVs, such as the indigenously developed 20-ton JALKAPI-XLUUV.

This manned-unmanned teaming is similar to the "loyal wingman" concept used in modern air combat, where unmanned aircraft support a crewed fighter jet.

In this underwater application, the main submarine can remain in a secure, stealthy position while sending the UUVs forward to conduct high-risk tasks like surveillance in contested waters, mine detection, or engaging enemy vessels.

Strategic Response to Regional Challenges​

The development of these advanced SSNs is a direct response to the shifting geopolitical landscape in the Indian Ocean.

Concerns over China's expanding naval presence, including its growing submarine fleet and access to ports in nations like Pakistan and Sri Lanka, have made enhancing India's underwater defence a priority.

The Project-77 submarines, teamed with their unmanned counterparts, will provide a robust protective shield for India’s high-value naval assets, particularly its aircraft carrier battle groups centred around INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant.

Global Trends and India's Standing​

By integrating manned-unmanned teaming, India joins a select group of nations at the forefront of naval technology.

The United States Navy is actively developing its Orca Extra-Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV), while China and Russia are also making significant investments in large autonomous underwater systems.

India’s commitment to this next-generation technology ensures it remains a competitive and capable power in the evolving domain of undersea warfare.

Timeline and Development​

The first submarine under Project-77 is projected to be launched within 10 to 12 years, with its formal commissioning into the Indian Navy expected by 2036-2037.

The complex project involves multiple agencies and locations, with design work led by the Navy’s Warship Design Bureau, hull fabrication by L&T, and final assembly at the Ship Building Centre in Visakhapatnam.

India's prior experience in building the Arihant-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) provides a valuable foundation of expertise for this ambitious new endeavour.
 
We can't match Chinese submarines in number, so we can build small UAV submarines in big numbers. It will be cheaper and give us a fighting chance against Chinese numbers.
 
India should become more competitive in timelines and execution, and especially it should avoid delays to eventually matching near Chinese naval power. I know it is difficult, but I hope this happens.
 
Now, start with a long-range, intelligent mine which can stay below the ocean floor and wait for enemy ships to come nearby and then target them. They keep themselves disabled until an opportunity comes. Load the Karachi port with hundreds of them.
 
This is a very important project that needs to be 100% indigenously designed, developed and manufactured from local raw materials.

Having mini UUV submarines is essential as they can be used to monitor important areas, shipping lanes and find future potential threats early on. Another advantage is that we can use these UUV from any ship and it doesn’t have to be used by submarines only. Using more UUV will help us reduce the purchase, operating and maintenance costs instead of using larger submarines all of the time.
 
India should become more competitive in timelines and execution, and especially it should avoid delays to eventually matching near Chinese naval power. I know it is difficult, but I hope this happens.
You are forgetting the government structures in India and China... In every 5 years there is a chance of change in government in India, and with the change there comes an absolute change in policies and priorities... Whereas, there are no such risk factors in the case of China... Chinese leaders are free from public mandate and its pressure, whereas Indian leaders are bound to fulfil the public mandate, especially their supporters.
 
You are forgetting the government structures in India and China... In every 5 years there is a chance of change in government in India, and with the change there comes an absolute change in policies and priorities... Whereas, there are no such risk factors in the case of China... Chinese leaders are free from public mandate and its pressure, whereas Indian leaders are bound to fulfil the public mandate, especially their supporters.
And if you look at the history, such democracies always outlast the socialists/dictatorships. At best, dictatorship can take you to a certain level and then you change to democracy. So in the long term, we will have that advantage.
 
And if you look at the history, such democracies always outlast the socialists/dictatorships. At best, dictatorship can take you to a certain level and then you change to democracy. So in the long term, we will have that advantage.
It is not about comparison, but I stated the reason in the previous statement on delays of Indian projects and having parity with Chinese capabilities. This forum is not the platform for me to discuss socio-political ideologies and their good and bad effects. Here, defence strategies and capabilities at present and in the near future are of the utmost importance.
 
It is not about comparison, but I stated the reason in the previous statement on delays of Indian projects and having parity with Chinese capabilities. This forum is not the platform for me to discuss socio-political ideologies and their good and bad effects. Here, defence strategies and capabilities at present and in the near future are of the utmost importance.
Actually our delays had little to do with democracy or dictatorship. All the governments so far supported Tejas and Kaveri wholeheartedly. Yet the delays and deficiencies persist. It's more to do with the DRDO and DPSUs. The employees have no incentive whatsoever to deliver anything on time or as per the specs. That's what has to change first.
 
Actually US SSNs do support such activities. Russia and France do as well. In fact, even Scorpene has such facilities and our Marcos are trained for them.
Do you really think that, like the USA, India will send our special commandos/forces onto foreign soil thousands of kilometres away from the mainland to act out an operation? Really? Look, I like to be in reality and I think our government and armed forces also like that. For special forces operations, we'll acquire special midget submarines. The SSNs are solely for the purpose of a swift, quick, and stealthy offensive attack on our adversary and keeping our surface fleet out of danger.
 
Do you really think that, like the USA, India will send our special commandos/forces onto foreign soil thousands of kilometres away from the mainland to act out an operation? Really? Look, I like to be in reality and I think our government and armed forces also like that. For special forces operations, we'll acquire special midget submarines. The SSNs are solely for the purpose of a swift, quick, and stealthy offensive attack on our adversary and keeping our surface fleet out of danger.
First of all, I was replying to this comment. "Do you even have any idea what is the purpose of having SSNs?" So the purpose of SSN was in question. My comment replied to that.

Secondly, our Navy already trains for such submersible insertions. So it's not just a possibility in my mind, but something we are already equipping ourselves for.

And if you are of the opinion that we won't send our forces to foreign shores, then why even have midgets? You are contradicting yourself here. So as I said before, even our Scorpenes are built for it. So it goes to logic (aka reality) that our SSNs will have this feature as well.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,184
Messages
56,532
Members
3,935
Latest member
rajeshsinha
Back
Top