LCH Prachand Takes Centre Stage in Indian Army's High-Altitude Plans Amid Apache Delays and Heavy Attack IMRH Uncertainty

LCH Prachand Takes Centre Stage in Indian Army's High-Altitude Plans Amid Apache Delays and Heavy Attack IMRH Uncertainty


The Indian Army's aviation modernization plans are currently navigating significant hurdles. Delays in receiving the first American-made Apache AH-64E attack helicopters coincide with stalled progress on the indigenous Indian Multi-Role Helicopter (IMRH) program, which awaits final government approval.

Amidst these challenges, the domestically developed Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) Prachand is emerging as a key focus for India's high-altitude combat aviation needs.

Delivery of the six potent Apache attack helicopters, ordered from Boeing in 2020, has been pushed back from late 2024 to early 2025. Boeing attributes this delay primarily to global supply chain disruptions. These helicopters, renowned for their anti-tank capabilities, are designated for deployment in India's desert regions, with the Army's 451 Aviation Squadron in Jodhpur prepared for their arrival.

In the interim, the Army continues to rely on its fleet of armed HAL Rudra helicopters (an armed version of the Dhruv utility helicopter) for attack roles, particularly in lower-altitude environments where the Apaches are expected to operate most effectively.

The Indian Air Force (IAF), having already integrated its 22 Apaches based in locations like Pathankot and Jorhat, mainly employs them in desert conditions. This deployment highlights the Apache's operational limitations at very high altitudes. Despite powerful engines and the capacity for heavy armaments like Hellfire missiles, the Apache's service ceiling of around 6,400 meters is less suited for the extreme altitudes encountered in regions like Ladakh and the Siachen Glacier, where the Army requires robust air support.

Meanwhile, the development of the 13-tonne IMRH by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is awaiting clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), a necessary step before proceeding further.

Designed to replace the extensive fleet of ageing Mi-17 transport helicopters across the armed forces, the IMRH is envisioned as a versatile platform for tasks including troop movement, air assault, and combat search and rescue. A total requirement of over 300 units is projected across the Army, IAF, and Navy, with a dedicated naval variant also planned.

HAL has completed crucial design stages and partnered with France's Safran for the helicopter's engine development. The advanced helicopter factory in Tumakuru is ready for production, but the project awaits the crucial CCS go-ahead, potentially delaying its first flight to 2027-28 and service entry into the early 2030s.

Significantly, HAL has confirmed it does not plan to develop a heavy attack helicopter based on the IMRH platform, similar in capability to the Apache. This decision stems from stated limited requirements for such a heavy platform from both the Army and the IAF. Sources indicate that the forces perceive limited operational utility for a dedicated heavy attack helicopter across India's varied terrain, preferring different solutions for diverse environments.

The IMRH, primarily designed for transport and utility with a focus on multi-role flexibility, has different payload capacities and design goals compared to the heavily armed, 9.5-tonne Apache.

Reflecting this strategic direction, the Indian government recently approved a major procurement of the indigenous LCH Prachand. In late March 2025, the CCS sanctioned the acquisition of 156 Prachand helicopters (90 for the Army, 66 for the IAF) at an estimated cost of ₹62,700 crore, with deliveries slated to commence in 2028.

Developed specifically from lessons learned during the 1999 Kargil conflict, the 5.8-tonne Prachand is optimized for high-altitude warfare. Its ability to operate effectively above 6,500 meters, demonstrated through landings on the Siachen Glacier, along with its armament package including cannons, rockets, and anti-tank missiles, makes it particularly suitable for India's mountainous border regions.

While the Prachand addresses critical high-altitude requirements, the delays affecting the Apache deliveries and the lack of an indigenous heavy attack helicopter program leave a potential gap. The Apache offers distinct advantages in conventional warfare scenarios on plains or deserts, capable of deeper strikes with heavier weapon loads against armoured targets.

The current strategy appears to favour specialized platforms: the Prachand for high mountains and the Apache (once delivered) for deserts and plains, highlighting a complementary approach rather than a single solution for all attack helicopter roles within the Indian armed forces' future inventory.
 
Boeing is definitely having issues with deliveries. Boeing had a long strike in 2024 that affected deliveries. Now we have Trump meddling with military orders to extract penance and grovelling.

India needs to grow some balls and stop allowing dyeing empires to step all over India. Allowing the US to deport Indians in US military planes is just one example. But, then again, India made sure the flights arrived in the Punjab to extract their own penance and grovelling, even though half the deportees were from Gujarat. But, then India is not China and will always be a middle power. Once your government sells out its own people for election politics, its over.

Screenshot 2025-04-09 221902.webp
 
TATA is making fuselage for Apaches better we also make Medium combat Helicopter based on APACHE air frame !
 
TATA is making fuselage for Apaches better we also make Medium combat Helicopter based on APACHE air frame !
The Prachant is a different design and much smaller than the Apache. It's also much cheaper than the Apache, only the Chinese copy other countries design. If we did that then no one would work with us.
 
Time to make a heavy lift transport helicopter like Sikorsky King Stallion, LCH is more than enough for attack roles.
 
Heavier payload has to be swarm based as they are at a longer distance.

Heavy and lighter are improper words.
Because of lightweight advanced metals, several lightweight can do the same thing that heavy can do.
Mixing range with heaviness is odd.

Could have told, long-range LCH is a need.
 
In my opinion, CCS's delay in approval can be for one reason: loss of faith in HAL and its ability to develop such a complex platform. Recent issues with ALH, along with issues like noise and vibration with LUH, have not helped in credibility building by HAL at all.
 
What heavy equipment besides Bunkers can be there on high altitude ,where a heavy attack helicopter like AH 64 or Mi 35 hind is needed. 1 rocket is enough to cause an avalanch in show at high altitude and where exactly is the aim of fighting ? Siachin is ours ,leaves other areas where precise bombing is needed as in Kargil , so the use of Armed with rockets, 20mm machine gun Scout helicopter that can retaliate to hidden enemy fire and direct attack on it is needed as helicopter can't blow up rock sangars. Armoured reasonably, stealth features , electronic jamming type armed helicopter is good enough
 
Uncle Sam is not delivering any of their defence products on time and is intentionally delaying the whole process. After securing GE engines, India should avoid any major mega defence deal with the US. Now is the time to teach them a lesson, as China is teaching them. The US is a country just to deal with, but not to have faith in. With the deliberate delaying of urgent defence requirements, it is now proved that Russia was a more trusted partner.
 
Don't know what the Indian army is thinking. Will we keep importing heavy attack helicopters in the future also, or what? Or maybe in the coming years, the heavy attack helicopter's role will diminish in future warfare.
 
Prachand is an incomplete helicopter as of now. What weapons does it carry. Reminds me of the Tejus story. To much of hype by HAL giving unfinished products to the Armed Forces.
 
India definitely needs to 100% indigenously design, develop and manufacture a dedicated heavy attack helicopter as we need to increase our firepower. We will need the ability to carry a large amount of missiles, rockets, bombs, swarm drones and loiter munitions as the threat level is going to increase. On top of that it will need to be large enough to install all of the advanced equipment, helicopter computer, software, defence systems and other technology etc.

Right now we can develop the IMRH to transport goods or troops but also use it as an attack helicopter if needed like the Rudra helicopter. The only problem is that we wouldn’t be able to install all of the advanced and modern technology, equipment, weapons or defence systems etc that you need to mandatorily install on an attack helicopter. That’s why now is the best time to develop the dedicated heavy attack helicopter with semi stealth capabilities like the Prachand as it will take at least 10 years to design, develop and manufacture it.
 
The use defines weapons system, high altitude is a speciality warfare area, and we have that area that is hostile, so use this Chopper to do work for whichs it's made.over clear flat lands , Chopper survival is a question mark post Ukraine where even jet killing by drones has happend and now presently in Africa Turkish drones in standoff distances of nearly 100km are being downed by Iranian killer drones . We got get real, the Airforce is top heavy and unwilling to acknowledge the real situation and wants heavy equipment, to what effect, this is no gaza ,there too choppers go down,they need a role, a zone of safety to do work
 
One simply can't be sure now days of tech innovation that has even paralyzed Russia that is begging for exit ,yet unable to do so. We don't have even 5 days ammo ,if both fronts open up and Bangladesh becomes a needle in foot. Somthing real than kids cartoon imagination is needed now .
 
LCA programme dates back to the days of PM Indira Gandhi's visit to the USA and Joint statement with the US president Ronald Reagan. And sell of 6 ALH Dhruv to Ecuador was a humiliating event for HAL. When a country like Brazil manufactures Embraer aircraft, why is India lagging so behind with 1.40 billion brains? Why does none take it seriously?
 
It doesn't matter if IAF and army want, India should be capable of making heavy attack copters in the Apache class. It WILL augment the existing crew.

Moreover, India can focus export markets as well.
 
Will the swash plate vibration and premature failing of parts, also be carried over to LCH?
 
In todays world order it is better to be fast in giving clearance for Indian platform. You cannot be guided by other countries on your defense needs. I think if the plan is ready and Safran is also ready with right engines government should give quick clearance so that we are ready to fly the 1st helicopter by 2028 and full integration by 2029 2030.
 
Does not Prachand use the same engine as the ALH? Hopefully it is of a different design (at least in the area it is giving problems) and will not have these issues.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,575
Messages
49,061
Members
3,077
Latest member
Jargon4
Back
Top