Persistent Delays and Quality Concerns in HAL's Fighter Jet Production Lead to Crisis for IAF, Prompting Calls for PMO Intervention

Persistent Delays and Quality Concerns in HAL's Fighter Jet Production Lead to Crisis for IAF, Prompting Calls for PMO Intervention


The Indian Air Force (IAF) is reportedly experiencing a decline in confidence in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the government-owned aerospace company responsible for manufacturing fighter jets to enhance India's aerial defense capabilities.

This growing distrust stems from ongoing production delays, concerns about manufacturing quality, and HAL's difficulty in meeting the IAF's operational deadlines. These problems are jeopardizing India's defense readiness, particularly in light of increased regional tensions.

The dwindling number of active IAF squadrons, combined with setbacks in domestic programs like the Tejas light combat aircraft, highlights the critical importance of this situation for India's aerospace sector.

Experts and industry analysts are urging immediate intervention from the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) to implement comprehensive reforms at HAL. This intervention is deemed necessary to ensure the company is capable of fulfilling the nation's strategic goals under the "Make in India" and "Aatmanirbhar Bharat" (self-reliant India) initiatives.

For many decades, HAL has served as the IAF's main provider of fighter aircraft. The company has delivered platforms such as the MiG-21, Jaguar, and Su-30 MKI, manufactured under license from foreign original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). HAL is also responsible for the indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas.

However, recent events indicate a growing strain in the relationship. The IAF currently operates with only 31 squadrons, significantly below its authorized strength of 42.5. To address this shortfall, the IAF depends on HAL to deliver Tejas Mk-1A jets and future variants, including the Mk-2 and the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), in a timely manner. HAL's past performance, however, has caused significant concern.

The Tejas Mk-1A program, a crucial element of India's efforts to develop a domestic fighter jet, exemplifies these concerns. In February 2021, the Cabinet Committee on Security authorized a contract worth Rs 48,000 crore (approximately USD 5.8 Billion) for 83 Mk-1A jets, with deliveries originally scheduled to commence in March 2024. However, as of March 2025, only a handful of aircraft have been delivered

HAL has attributed these delays to disruptions in the supply chain, challenges integrating the EL/M-2052 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, and difficulties in increasing production beyond its current capacity of eight jets per year.

The IAF, facing the retirement of its aging MiG-21 and MiG-27 fleets, had anticipated a production rate of 16 to 20 jets annually – a target HAL has consistently failed to achieve. This has led the Air Force to consider acquiring foreign aircraft, such as the Rafale, and to re-evaluate its reliance on domestic production.

Beyond the issue of delays, significant concerns regarding quality have further eroded the IAF's confidence. Reports, including those circulating on social media platform X, from early 2025 indicate that Tejas aircraft have experienced technical malfunctions during trials. These incidents have raised serious questions about HAL's quality control procedures.

A senior IAF official, speaking anonymously to The Hindu, stated that the Air Force "cannot afford to induct aircraft that need constant troubleshooting when we're already stretched thin."

This sentiment echoes previous criticisms, including a 2016 report by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India on the Su-30 MKI. The CAG report found that HAL-assembled jets exhibited lower reliability compared to those imported directly from Russia, due to inconsistencies in the manufacturing process.

The declining trust in HAL is not merely a logistical problem; it represents a significant strategic challenge. India's defense strategy relies heavily on achieving self-reliance to effectively counter potential threats from neighboring countries, such as China and Pakistan, both of which possess modern air forces.

The Tejas Mk-1A, with its 4.5-generation capabilities, is intended to replace older MiG aircraft and supplement the Su-30 and Rafale fleets. The development of the more advanced Mk-2 and the stealth AMCA are also crucial for maintaining a credible future deterrent. However, HAL's slow progress – with the Mk-2's first flight postponed to 2027 and the AMCA's to 2032 – puts these objectives at risk.

This diminishing confidence has the potential to disrupt the "Make in India" initiative. While private sector companies like Tata Advanced Systems and Kalyani Group are increasingly involved in aerospace manufacturing (supplying components like C295 airframes and Airbus landing gears), HAL remains the key player in fighter jet production.

If the IAF is compelled to rely on imports, as demonstrated by the 2016 acquisition of 36 Rafale jets, India's indigenous aerospace industry could suffer, negating decades of investment in organizations like the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and HAL itself.

The gravity of the situation necessitates immediate and decisive action. Experts are calling for the PMO, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, to intervene and mandate substantial reforms at HAL. These recommended reforms include:
  • Leadership Changes: The appointment of a Chairman with a strong technical background and proven experience in the aerospace industry, replacing the current leadership structure, to foster greater accountability and innovation.
  • Increased Production Capacity: Expanding HAL's manufacturing facilities beyond the existing sites in Bengaluru and Nashik, and collaborating with private sector companies to achieve an annual production rate of at least 20 jets. This would bring HAL closer to the production benchmarks of international manufacturers, such as Dassault Aviation's Rafale production line.
  • Enhanced Quality Control: The establishment of an independent oversight body, potentially under the authority of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), to rigorously audit HAL's manufacturing processes and ensure they meet the IAF's stringent requirements.
  • Strict Deadlines: Imposing binding deadlines for the delivery of Tejas aircraft (for example, 40 Mk-1A jets by 2027), with penalties for any delays, to incentivize efficiency and adherence to schedules.
  • Greater Private Sector Involvement: Encouraging Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to delegate the production of subsystems, such as engines and avionics, to companies like Bharat Forge or Mahindra Defence Systems. This would allow HAL to concentrate on the final assembly and integration of the aircraft.
The PMO has a history of successful interventions. Its involvement in 2021 expedited the LCA contract, and its support for DRDO reforms has led to improvements in missile programs like Agni and BrahMos.

A similar proactive approach could help realign HAL with the IAF's needs, rebuild trust, and accelerate the production of domestically manufactured fighter jets.

The urgency of the situation is further heightened by regional security dynamics. The Chinese People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) reportedly operates over 150 J-20 stealth fighters. Additionally, Pakistan is enhancing its air force with the JF-17 Block III and is considering acquiring J-31 fighters, potentially diminishing India's aerial advantage.

The IAF, with its current strength of only 31 squadrons, faces a potential shortfall of approximately 200 fighter aircraft by 2030 if HAL's performance does not improve dramatically.

The Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) tender, intended to procure 114 foreign jets, remains unresolved, making indigenous production the crucial factor in maintaining India's air power. A malfunctioning HAL could force India into more expensive foreign acquisitions, straining the national budget and compromising the country's strategic independence.
 
How much drama will you do, IAF, to get your Rafales? The current situation is of your own making.
  • Constantly changing goalposts, preventing hardening of design
  • Peacemeal ordering and budget allocation, to prevent one-time massive investment in production logistics and supply chain
  • Refusing to fly with anything less than 100% performance (that is the norm worldwide), forcing pie-in-the-sky engine choices from unreliable vendors in the US
  • Not inducting a national project to refine it 'in service' and suffering the three-legged cheetah syndrome, while at the same time inducting non-battle-ready imports like Jaguar etc.
And yet you cry now, like a child who only wants that particular imported lollipop! Congratulations!
 
HAL fanbois will remain silent today except one who will blame GE. IAF chief should have criticised sooner to wake up our RM who was in a kumbakarna sleep.
 
How much drama will you do, IAF, to get your Rafales? The current situation is of your own making.
  • Constantly changing goalposts, preventing hardening of design
  • Peacemeal ordering and budget allocation, to prevent one-time massive investment in production logistics and supply chain
  • Refusing to fly with anything less than 100% performance (that is the norm worldwide), forcing pie-in-the-sky engine choices from unreliable vendors in the US
  • Not inducting a national project to refine it 'in service' and suffering the three-legged cheetah syndrome, while at the same time inducting non-battle-ready imports like Jaguar etc.
And yet you cry now, like a child who only wants that particular imported lollipop! Congratulations!
This is what happens when novices comment without even having any knowledge of the facts. What one can blame the IAF for is that they unnecessarily delayed the MRFA RFP to fill in the black hole in Bharat's security due to the "high-grade" INEFFICIENCY of HAL.
 
What will the PMO do? As if the PMO didn't know. 32+4 jets in the last 11 years.
You think the PMO hasn't got any work, like you, other than overseeing HAL? Actually, the PMO is responsible for strategic policy-making to make Bharat into one of the largest economies. Moreover, you do not know anything about management. Once a power is delegated, freedom is given to the concerned ministry to manage it. If anyone needs to be blamed, it is our MoD under RM, who should have actually snubbed and reprimanded HAL for inefficiency.
 
How much drama will you do, IAF, to get your Rafales? The current situation is of your own making.
  • Constantly changing goalposts, preventing hardening of design
  • Peacemeal ordering and budget allocation, to prevent one-time massive investment in production logistics and supply chain
  • Refusing to fly with anything less than 100% performance (that is the norm worldwide), forcing pie-in-the-sky engine choices from unreliable vendors in the US
  • Not inducting a national project to refine it 'in service' and suffering the three-legged cheetah syndrome, while at the same time inducting non-battle-ready imports like Jaguar etc.
And yet you cry now, like a child who only wants that particular imported lollipop! Congratulations!
  • Goalposts are changed when you offer a fighter that had to be delivered in the 2000s, and the delivery is still not completed by 2025.
  • The IAF just gives its requirement. Whether to order piecemeal or not, it's up to the GOI. The IAF wanted 126 Rafales, but got only 36.
  • The IAF has been flying coffins since eternity. Can you name five countries still flying MiG-21s, Mirages, and Jaguars?
  • The IAF doesn't select engines. It is the MOD/HAL/GOI that selects engines. Don't blame the IAF for selecting the GE404 or GE414.
  • If not Jaguars at that point, what options did the IAF have?
  • If the GOI can't give them indigenous fighters in time, what is the IAF supposed to do?The IAF has no power to buy anything. It all depends on the GOI. The IAF doesn't cry. It is people like you who are crybabies.
 
Unless India's aero engine dilemma is resolved through indigenous means or help from external OEMs, this situation will persist.

The bureaucrats negotiating with multiple OEMs are either not taking the situation seriously or are being paid by external agencies to keep it murky.
 
Earlier, HAL used to blame the IAF for constantly changing goalposts. No excuse after the Air Force once confirms and accepts the CDR, and it is HAL's duty to deliver with the agreed specifications and stick to delivery schedules. HAL, with its monopoly, is blocking the local private industry and forcing it to go for foreign suppliers. Listen Left Liberals, Ambani, Adani, and Kalyanis are far more dependable than foreign suppliers and need to be encouraged. Damn the PSU assholes who neither deliver nor become a roadblock for the local private industry.
 
HAL to be divided. First, its helicopter division is to be separated as a new entity. Then, the fighter division will work fine. The transport aircraft division to be sold to Pvt. Then HAL employees will work properly. Then only they know the important work. Otherwise, all confused.
 
PMO should intervene in MRFA tender to fast track induction of F-15EX-II or F-36 ! There is no need of costly Rafales in large numbers ! Buy 60+ F-35s through G2 G route asap till AMCA start rolling out ,Ink deal with Rolls Royce to make 90-95 Kn engines for Tejas fighter jets and Russian hybrid engines with 100% TOT for AMCA jets !
 
You think the PMO hasn't got any work, like you, other than overseeing HAL? Actually, the PMO is responsible for strategic policy-making to make Bharat into one of the largest economies. Moreover, you do not know anything about management. Once a power is delegated, freedom is given to the concerned ministry to manage it. If anyone needs to be blamed, it is our MoD under RM, who should have actually snubbed and reprimanded HAL for inefficiency.
What will reprimanding them do? Disinvestment comes under MoF.

As for RM, he has already started the process of creating a competitor. But indeed, he is way too biased towards indigenous products and for that HAL is the only option. And he knows he can't change HAL. So catch 22.
 
How much drama will you do, IAF, to get your Rafales? The current situation is of your own making.
  • Constantly changing goalposts, preventing hardening of design
  • Peacemeal ordering and budget allocation, to prevent one-time massive investment in production logistics and supply chain
  • Refusing to fly with anything less than 100% performance (that is the norm worldwide), forcing pie-in-the-sky engine choices from unreliable vendors in the US
  • Not inducting a national project to refine it 'in service' and suffering the three-legged cheetah syndrome, while at the same time inducting non-battle-ready imports like Jaguar etc.
And yet you cry now, like a child who only wants that particular imported lollipop! Congratulations!
  1. Tejas was to be inducted into the IAF in 1995. Which requirements did the IAF change until then? Or even until 2005? It was only in 2005, a decade after the deadline passed and the plane seemed nowhere near induction, that they changed the requirements. Do you want them to fight with a plane whose specs were drafted in the 80s?
  2. The IAF had agreed to order over 200 Tejas. When that never came, they had agreed to give that many orders for the Mk2. So what are you talking about when you said piecemeal orders? Not to mention, the IAF pays the entire cost, from R&D to infrastructure to production costs, to the relevant agencies. So whether they give small orders or big ones isn't an excuse to delay the orders.
  3. They ordered IOC Tejas as well, which was nowhere near 100%. So, another lie.
  4. Again, they inducted Tejas and agreed to let refinements happen over time. IOC, FOC, Mk1A, and Mk2. But nothing is getting delivered at all. HAL and DRDO refuse to deliver anything, absolutely anything, at all. Mk1 trainers not yet delivered, no Mk1A, no rollout for Mk2. Nothing at all.
P.S. This is what happens when you leave mission-critical manufacturing to institutes like HAL.
 
  • Goalposts are changed when you offer a fighter that had to be delivered in the 2000s, and the delivery is still not completed by 2025.
  • The IAF just gives its requirement. Whether to order piecemeal or not, it's up to the GOI. The IAF wanted 126 Rafales, but got only 36.
  • The IAF has been flying coffins since eternity. Can you name five countries still flying MiG-21s, Mirages, and Jaguars?
  • The IAF doesn't select engines. It is the MOD/HAL/GOI that selects engines. Don't blame the IAF for selecting the GE404 or GE414.
  • If not Jaguars at that point, what options did the IAF have?
  • If the GOI can't give them indigenous fighters in time, what is the IAF supposed to do?The IAF has no power to buy anything. It all depends on the GOI. The IAF doesn't cry. It is people like you who are crybabies.
  • Not the 2000s, bro. Tejas was to be inducted in the mid-1990s.
  • Whether the IAF gives piecemeal orders or big ones is irrelevant. The IAF pays the entire cost, from R&D to the spare parts, including the cost of infrastructure.
  • Engines are selected by the DRDO (which technically does come under the MoD, but still). So, they are the sole entity to be blamed for any selections.
 
Unless India's aero engine dilemma is resolved through indigenous means or help from external OEMs, this situation will persist.

The bureaucrats negotiating with multiple OEMs are either not taking the situation seriously or are being paid by external agencies to keep it murky.
Engines are the least of our worries. HAL hasn't even delivered the jets for which engines were delivered in 2020 and orders were given in 2018. So engines are the least of our problems right now.
 
HAL to be divided. First, its helicopter division is to be separated as a new entity. Then, the fighter division will work fine. The transport aircraft division to be sold to Pvt. Then HAL employees will work properly. Then only they know the important work. Otherwise, all confused.
Lol...it's not like they are all doing all the things. All divisions are already separate, with different people heading the respective divisions. But none of them are working.
 
Faith?! What type of faith? Faith in a "screwdriver Navratna company" which is unable to build a cheap helicopter like the Advanced Light Helicopter-Dhruv, but continuously fooling the public through new iterations of the ALH? It is ludicrous to see that, despite so many delays, HAL's order book is full. Such a type of company can exist only in India.

Right from the very beginning, the Indian government was wrong to have faith in HAL, that it can build a 4th generation fighter aircraft. But despite all these, HAL wants to build the LUH, IMRH, transport planes for varying capacity, passenger aircraft like the Boeing 747, and last but not least, a fifth-generation fighter aircraft.
 
Can IAF control HAL's assembly line..? Meaning if whoever wants a product takes the responsibility of completing it..then do it however they want.. IAF should get full involvement. They should get more authority or something like that..!!!
 
Lethargy, zero accountability, and incompetency are the cause. Privatisation is the only way forward. Sack incompetent people from top to bottom, including the door opener. Change the management and infuse fresh blood. These changes alone would bring in the desired result.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,148
Messages
45,322
Members
2,893
Latest member
bhatnagariaf
Back
Top