Rolls-Royce Proposes Full IP Transfer for AMCA Engine Development

Safran_M88_engines__1_.jpg


In a move that could significantly bolster India's indigenous defense capabilities, Rolls-Royce has proposed a revolutionary collaboration for the development of the engine for India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). Alex Zino, the company's future programs chief, has committed to a complete transfer of intellectual property (IP) rights to India for a jointly developed engine.

This unprecedented offer is a departure from traditional models, empowering India with full ownership of the engine's technology. The collaboration is aimed at fostering knowledge transfer and indigenous capabilities, going beyond mere production or licensing agreements.

"We are ready to deepen our partnership with India by designing and developing aero engines in collaboration with Indian entities," Zino stated, highlighting Rolls-Royce's commitment to joint development and knowledge sharing. He also emphasized the rarity of such an offer, signaling the company's high regard for this potential partnership.

Furthermore, Zino stated that Rolls-Royce is working closely with India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to propose solutions that transfer capabilities to India, develop IP, and establish manufacturing in India for both national security and potential export in the future.

This collaboration, if realized, could be a game-changer for India's aerospace industry, establishing the country as a self-reliant force in aero-engine development with the potential to become a global exporter of its expertise.
 
But, they are offering the cheapest SEF jets now for IAF, with latest AIM174B 400 kms range of VLRAAM...
Question is whether they will be allowed to complete the project. That is more important than price.
 
IAF said no to Rafale after buying only 36, even after your master Macron’s repeated begging, pleading and crying more than 100 times 🥲😩😭.
WHY MoD is not releasing Boeing F18SH offer pricings to press still.....???
 
WHY MoD is not releasing Boeing F18SH offer pricings to press still.....???
They will release it, if Rafale-M pricing discussion fall through, the main reason why they decided to buy Rafale-M even though it is extremely expensive is because they just don’t want to introduce a totally new jet just for the small order of 26 jets and buy totally diffferent arms, they also wanted to use these 26 jets with the 36 in Air force, it also means that they won’t buy any more Rafale’s unless otherwise they wanted to replace a lost jet.
 
The problem is that India and France signed a deal last year to design and develop a brand new engine. RR only just started to clearly say they will give us 100% of the IP, technology and manufacture it all in India. They are late.
French made us run merry go round around them, like the Fox and Sour grapes, this is why we ran away from them and are talking to RR and GE now, moreover France doesn’t have the tech to make advanced engines anyway.
 
Be mindful of the "gap" it would create in our technical know-how.
Invest that money in building test facilities, instead.
 
French made us run merry go round around them, like the Fox and Sour grapes, this is why we ran away from them and are talking to RR and GE now, moreover France doesn’t have the tech to make advanced engines anyway.
No they were the first one to offer such a good deal. All of the others weren’t prepared to give 100% of the technology or manufacture it in India. RR only recently changed its position because Safran offered a better deal to us and knew it would lose if they didn’t offer anything similar in jet engines. As for GE they have clearly said that they wouldn’t transfer 100% of the technology or make it entirely in India which is why they lost.
 
IAF said no to Rafale after buying only 36, even after your master Macron’s repeated begging, pleading and crying more than 100 times 🥲😩😭.
Nopes. IAF in fact suggested IN to buy them and are pushing their own case to MoD. They told Macroj that they need all 114 and not even 1 less. Unlike Russia which was specifically told to F off.
 
Buy a whole box of burnol and antacid and keep it ready, you might need it soon 😂😂😂.
Oh history shows us that France haters need it more. Like how you all said F18 would win but lost badly. Or no more Scorpenes but we bought them. So you should buy a whole truckload now.
 
Nopes. IAF in fact suggested IN to buy them and are pushing their own case to MoD. They told Macroj that they need all 114 and not even 1 less. Unlike Russia which was specifically told to F off.
because they know that they don’t want one more or will get the funding to get one more and wanted to use Navy’s Rafale along with the ever only 36 Rafale’s.
 
No they were the first one to offer such a good deal. All of the others weren’t prepared to give 100% of the technology or manufacture it in India. RR only recently changed its position because Safran offered a better deal to us and knew it would lose if they didn’t offer anything similar in jet engines. As for GE they have clearly said that they wouldn’t transfer 100% of the technology or make it entirely in India which is why they lost.
They did, but they didn’t want to help with the Kaveri engine, instead of fixing and enhancing GTRE Kaveri engine, they wanted us to use their ancient tech slow SNECMA M88’s hot core mated to a powerful after burner and pay royalties for ever on top of $1Bln initial payment, this is very expensive for an ancient tech, but IAF wanted more powerful hot core that produces more raw output for super cruising without using After Burner for AMCA, this is why we are talking with RR and GE.
 
Nope. Only MoU was signed. PIB release has mentioned that.
A MoU was signed which stated that a brand new engine will be designed and developed and manufactured in India. Currently they are working out on who develops what, technology requirement, work share agreement, technology involved, machinery required etc. So a deal is going to be signed in a more detailed contract that specifies everything which only happens after a firm commitment was given by the MoU where a signed deal follows.
 
We didn't sign a deal, only a MoU. It was included provisionally in that technology roadmap.
Yes a MoU is only signed if there is a firm commitment and a contract always follows that finalises the engine, technology, work share agreements, capabilities, machinery involved, metallurgy requirements and composition etc. So India has made it certain that they want to develop it with Safran.
 
Not necessary. Saab keeps offering 100% when they only have 45%. Russia offered 70% ToT for Ka226T but then refused being 63%(33% of overall tech).

Moreover, what they have may be of poor quality as well. EF consortium refused it. US refused it. Even UK refused it. They sent proposals to all.

GoI will of course decide. But if we were to not even discuss it then this platform won’t exist. When it happens then we will switch our comments to that.
I am not talking about Saab or Russia here!!
it is about fighter jet engine for future and getting best deal possible!!
And about discussion we should do that but it just about getting better deal for our forces!!
 
I very well know the meaning of blank check but it seems you don’t. Mod gives blank checks to DRDO.

They have no option. Mod has made it compulsory since the last 3-4 years and that’s why they are giving it,

Indeed it is comical that DRDO gets blank checks and then wastes it all and delivers nothing. Yet no action against them. Very very comic but painful,
I don't know for you 2.8billion Us$ means unlimited money!!
Basically you just know it for how many programs run for it!! That's pathetic to say it is never going to enough for the further and various projects run and various programs got on hold due to lack of funds!!
Wastage of money for people like you R&D is never a waste of money!! If you don't know the basics of R&D then I am not going to say anything!!
 
Oh history shows us that France haters need it more. Like how you all said F18 would win but lost badly. Or no more Scorpenes but we bought them. So you should buy a whole truckload now.
But history changed in the last few years after COVID and Ukraine war, it is upside down now, it has taught India and other Countries valuable lessons, most importantly not to buy anything from puppets.
 
But history changed in the last few years after COVID and Ukraine war, it is upside down now, it has taught India and other Countries valuable lessons, most importantly not to buy anything from puppets.
That’s why France became the world’s second biggest arms exporter? 😂😂😂😂 Heartburn for French haters
 
Yes a MoU is only signed if there is a firm commitment and a contract always follows that finalises the engine, technology, work share agreements, capabilities, machinery involved, metallurgy requirements and composition etc. So India has made it certain that they want to develop it with Safran.
Nope, MoU is an indication of both sides willing to discuss the plans in greater detail. It is by no means an assurance of an order.

MoUs can showcase potential deals, but they are very rarely legally binding. For instance, Malaysia had, at one point, signed an MoU for the Tejas, but they ended up procuring the FA-50. Similarly, while Argentina signed a MoU last year for the LCH and LUH, it doesn't mean they'll buy them for sure.
 
First India dont want to Join either FCAS or GCAP , India wants its own stealth Fighter jet AMCA to fly with Indigenous Engine which want to develop with Foreign help.But UK want India India to Join Tempest program. against the expense of AMCA Project.Mark my word This Engine is Linked with Tempest project.RR have two offers One Engine will b developed which is Just Like GE-414 Type(may help developing Hot cre section) Second offer is 6th Gen Engine JV with India for Tempest.But India can make use of UK offer to put pressure on other contenders to get Best deal.I previously also said India want every nut / bolt to b manufactured in India with Fully Eco-system developed whether it is Engine of Fighter jet. & Tempest being Multinational project India will not have chance to established complete Eco-system developed around it in India.But French know it,a common Engine can b developed for AMCA & FCAS. Second thing If Rafale wins MRFA which is most likely the same Engine which Safran/DRDO develped for AMCA (110 kN) will also b integrated on Indian Rafale (Air force & Marine both 36+26+114=176) french are in front runners at the moment.
Um, respectfully, I disagree. Something like the Tempest should be seen as a replacement for the Su-30MKI, not as an AMCA substitute. To put it very simply, we are in absolutely no shape to develop a sixth generation fighter by ourselves, and unless we want to remain 20 years behind the rest of the world for the next century when it comes to aircraft development, we need to start pushing the envelope as well.

Coming to the engine itself, RR has never offered the Tempest engine to India. They cannot do that, since they aren't the sole developers. That engine is being co-developed by RR, MTU, and JAE. In any case, even if we were to, hypothetically speaking, join GCAP, we still would almost certainly not be allowed to use the Tempest engine on AMCA.

Coming to FCAS, France and Spain are working on a different engine for FCAS. It isn't the same engine that Safran is proposing for AMCA, so while they may be similar, they will also be different engines. Secondly, doing something like integrating some other engine on an aircraft is very difficult unless you build in the capability. If you decide to, hypothetically again, refit the AMCA engine (co-developed with Safran in this scenario) on India's Rafales, then you have a set of constraints on dimensions and weight for the AMCA engine, which, in complete honesty, is an avoidable set of constraints.

Don't mix up engines, and don't bring in unnecessary constraints. Both of them end badly.
 
I don't know for you 2.8billion Us$ means unlimited money!!
Basically you just know it for how many programs run for it!! That's pathetic to say it is never going to enough for the further and various projects run and various programs got on hold due to lack of funds!!
Wastage of money for people like you R&D is never a waste of money!! If you don't know the basics of R&D then I am not going to say anything!!
Did I say unlimited money? I said blank check. So you have proven you don’t know what a blank check means.

Similarly you don’t know the basics of R&D either. I never said don’t develop. I said give a chance to those who can develop and not to failures. But seems you only advocate for the failed.
 
I am not talking about Saab or Russia here!!
it is about fighter jet engine for future and getting best deal possible!!
And about discussion we should do that but it just about getting better deal for our forces!!
You said if they have given an offer then they must have the tech. Saab offer proves that one can make headlines (and offers) by offering what they don’t have as well. It’s called analogy.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,322
Messages
26,961
Members
1,469
Latest member
Dr
Back
Top