Saab Sweetens MRFA Bid with Gripen E Jet's Unmatched Modularity, Offering India Indigenous Tech Integration and Future-Proofing

Saab Sweetens MRFA Bid with Gripen E Jet's Unmatched Modularity, Offering India Indigenous Tech Integration and Future-Proofing


As the Indian Air Force (IAF) looks to modernize its fighter fleet, the ability to quickly adapt to new threats and integrate the latest technology has become a top priority.

Saab, the Swedish aerospace and defense company, is emphasizing the unique modular design of its Gripen fighter jet as a key advantage in India's ongoing competition to acquire 114 new Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA).

Annika Meijer, Head of Design for Saab's Gripen, recently highlighted how the Gripen's flexible design and architecture make it a strong contender for India. The Gripen's approach to software, hardware, and intellectual property (IP) protection is designed to meet the IAF's need for a fighter that can be easily updated and customized.

A core element of the Gripen's design is its "layered" approach to software and architecture, using what's known as Distributed Integrated Modular Avionics (DIMA). This system separates functions based on their importance, allowing for rapid updates and changes without compromising safety.

"The DIMA architecture is built on the categorization of functions," Meijer explained. This means that less critical functions, like adding a new sensor, can be updated separately from critical systems like hydraulics or fuel pumping. This separation allows Saab to quickly update non-critical systems, significantly reducing downtime and certification delays.

For safety-critical functions, a more rigorous development and verification process is followed. "Everything is split up, but the processes will need to be adapted depending on the criticality that you have put on the functionality," Meijer stated. This ensures that while vital updates take longer, less crucial enhancements can be implemented quickly, keeping the aircraft technologically advanced.

A key feature of the Gripen is its ability to incorporate specific requirements from different countries. This is achieved through "selectable" and "deletable" layers in its software. "India can select functions specific to them, like a communication system or data link," Meijer said. "If there are specific weapons, sensors, or cryptos that need to be integrated, it’s very easy to update and test."

This is particularly important for India, which wants to integrate its own systems, like the Astra beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM), the BrahMos-NG missile, and Indian-developed data links. The Gripen's design allows these integrations without interfering with the aircraft's core systems.

The "deletable layer" offers a crucial benefit for protecting intellectual property, a major concern for India. "If you have a function that you want to keep in India and don’t want to share with anyone else, it’s your IP and your licenses. It will be deleted completely from the platform for everyone else," Meijer emphasized. This guarantees that India-specific enhancements remain exclusive to India.

The Gripen's architecture is built for speed and flexibility. "If we want to do an update of a tactical system that is non-critical, we can do it very quickly because it’s isolated," Meijer explained.

This is a significant advantage for the IAF, which often faces long delays when integrating new systems on other aircraft. The Gripen's modularity also simplifies the process of verifying and certifying new additions.

The Gripen E/F is competing against other advanced fighters, like the French Rafale, the American F-15EX, and the Russian Su-35, in the MRFA competition.

While the Rafale is already in service with the IAF, the Gripen offers lower operating costs, its modular design, and Saab's commitment to technology transfer and local production under India's "Make in India" initiative.

According to previous reports, Saab has offered to establish a complete manufacturing facility in India, including the production of engines and avionics, if the Gripen is selected.

Meijer's explanation of the Gripen's design highlights its suitability for the IAF's requirement for a fighter that is built for a complex world, one that can adapt to India's specific needs and seamlessly integrate future technologies.

The ability to protect India-specific technology, implement rapid upgrades, and maintain flexibility positions the Gripen as a technologically advanced platform ready to evolve with the IAF's future requirements.
 
India won't buy it because it make too much sence. They will only buy it after everyone else does and its a 10 year wait for delivery. Indian government has no spine, decisions are made on internal political grounds.
 
Under the MRFA, most likely a twin-engine and latest/modern tech fighter jet with local assembly and an ecosystem developed around it, and autonomy in future upgrades of sensors/weapon integration without OEM permission, will be the winner. The Gripen does not have a chance as it is a single-engine, similar to the Tejas Mk2, and for its engine, it has to depend on the US.
 
India won't buy it because it make too much sence. They will only buy it after everyone else does and its a 10 year wait for delivery. Indian government has no spine, decisions are made on internal political grounds.
They have offered local production, also I read somewhere that it can launch satellites also.
 
India isn’t going to buy anymore foreign expensive jets. It just needs to focus more on developing and manufacturing our own Tejas MK1A, MK2 and the AMCA jets as quick as possible. They should allow several private sector companies to start manufacturing the entire jets and not just parts and components.
 
One suitable option.
Get 114 additional Rafales for MRFA.
Get Rafale F5 ( being undertaken by France) for AMCA. This config of Rafale will be equal in performance to F-35.
Navy has posted for Rafale-M. Have fewer origin fleet...
 
India is notoriously famous for delays in timely decision making in crucial procurements and signing the deal dragging on for years some times without any outcomes. Of course it will take some time probably a year or the latest by two years to evaluate and negotiate for the ideal product compatible to India's requirements. This is the second round of RFI issued for 114 MRFA procurement for the IAF. The MoD is not concerned with IAF's fast depleting fighter squadrons and the urgent need for stopgap. Probably they are more confident there is no imminent in at the moment so dependent on Tejas mk1A and Mk2 will solve the stopgap in IAF. Buying the question is when will this mk1A and Mk2 will compliment the stopgap.
 
One suitable option.
Get 114 additional Rafales for MRFA.
Get Rafale F5 ( being undertaken by France) for AMCA. This config of Rafale will be equal in performance to F-35.
Navy has posted for Rafale-M. Have fewer origin fleet...
The Rafael M deal is not signed yet and when will Rafael F5 will be inducted in the French Air Force. When will these F5 will be certified and it's credentials tested and proven its worth as announced by the Dassault's top executives.
 
Our best option is to add another 200 SU30 MKI with advanced avionics and BVRMs. The fastest and quickest solutions. HAL can keep working on what ever they are working and hand over manufacturing to the Civil Sector. We are stupid to compare prices with western fighters. When the AF has run out of fighters the Govt needs to step in financially to give private the money to set up manufacturing units to produce 60 fighters a year. It's a matter of National Defence, where money is of no consequence.
 
MRFA tender for 144 fighters started in UPA 1 tenure, then UPA 2, NDA 1(36 Rafales for which emergency clause had to be invoked for off the shelf purchase), NDA 2 and now we are in NDA3 tenure. 20 years it takes for a fighter tender? God, in 20 years the tech becomes obsolete, and an entire gen of fighter could have been developed from scratch. China develops in 10 years, and deploys in 15 years. Are we even thinking of matching China in efficiency or we have already given up? Turkeys and s korea developed their 4.5 gen aircraft in 10 years, ie half the time we are taking to buy one. Is it acceptable?
 
MRFA tender for 144 fighters started in UPA 1 tenure, then UPA 2, NDA 1(36 Rafales for which emergency clause had to be invoked for off the shelf purchase), NDA 2 and now we are in NDA3 tenure. 20 years it takes for a fighter tender? God, in 20 years the tech becomes obsolete, and an entire gen of fighter could have been developed from scratch. China develops in 10 years, and deploys in 15 years. Are we even thinking of matching China in efficiency or we have already given up? Turkeys and s korea developed their 4.5 gen aircraft in 10 years, ie half the time we are taking to buy one. Is it acceptable?
Indian bureaucracy has to be streamlined. Maybe, it can't happen in a PSU. Managers are afraid to promote the best but rely instead on seniority. That's why India need to privatize weapons production. Only a handful of countries have the PSU model and they are all dictatorships.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,271
Messages
46,474
Members
2,936
Latest member
Diagruntldind
Back
Top