Su-34 Fighter-Bomber Can Fill India's Deep Strike Gap within Budget Constraints, Assert Russian Media Citing Synergy with Su-30MKI

Su-34 Fighter-Bomber Can Fill India's Deep Strike Gap within Budget Constraints, Assert Russian Media Citing Synergy with Su-30MKI


Russian state media has recently initiated a campaign highlighting the Sukhoi Su-34, known by its NATO reporting name "Fullback," as a formidable solution for the Indian Air Force's (IAF) requirement for a deep penetration strike aircraft.

The proposal, featured on the Sputnik India platform, presents the fighter-bomber as a strategic asset that could enhance India's long-range combat capabilities.

This advocacy coincides with the Russian Aerospace Forces accepting a new batch of these aircraft in late 2024, signalling continued confidence in the platform's modern warfare capabilities.

The Su-34 is a twin-engine, all-weather, supersonic medium-range fighter-bomber, primarily designed for tactical deployment against ground and naval targets.

A key argument for its adoption by India is its potential to seamlessly integrate with the IAF's existing infrastructure.

The IAF already operates a large fleet of over 270 Su-30MKI multirole fighters, which share a common lineage with the Su-34 as both were developed from the Su-27 'Flanker' airframe. This commonality could lead to significant cost savings and logistical efficiencies in maintenance, training, and spare parts management.

A notable characteristic of the Su-34 is its unique cockpit design, which features a side-by-side seating arrangement for the two-person crew. This spacious layout, more akin to a larger bomber than a typical fighter, includes enough room for a crew member to stand or rest during flight.

For the IAF, which often conducts long-endurance missions across India's vast northern and western frontiers, this feature is promoted as a crucial advantage for reducing crew fatigue and maintaining peak operational focus during extended combat sorties.

The aircraft boasts impressive technical specifications tailored for deep strike missions. It can carry a substantial weapons payload of up to 8 tonnes, including a versatile mix of precision-guided bombs, air-to-surface cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, and air-to-air missiles for self-defence.

With a combat radius of approximately 1,100 kilometres on internal fuel, the Su-34 can strike distant targets without heavy reliance on mid-air refuelling. Its ability to reach speeds of Mach 1.8 and perform low-level, terrain-hugging flight allows it to penetrate contested airspace and evade enemy radar systems.

The Su-34's capabilities have been extensively tested in real-world combat situations, particularly in Syria and Ukraine. In these conflicts, it has been used to deliver precision strikes, suppress enemy air defences (SEAD), and launch long-range cruise missiles in highly challenging operational environments.

This combat record demonstrates the aircraft's versatility and resilience, qualities that would be valuable to the IAF as it prepares for a wide spectrum of potential security threats.

From a strategic perspective, the Su-34 is presented as an ideal fit for India's operational theatres. Its long range and heavy payload are well-suited for missions deep inside territories protected by robust air defence networks.

Furthermore, its proficiency in maritime strike roles, with the ability to carry potent anti-ship missiles, would strengthen India's military posture in the increasingly contested Indian Ocean Region.

Russian sources argue that the Su-34 offers these capabilities at a lower acquisition and operational cost than comparable Western aircraft, making it an economically viable option for India as it continues its ambitious military modernization programme within a constrained budget.
 
As F-15EX is not for India better we buy 80-90 Super Su-34MKI powered by new hybrid engines capable to carry 15000+ ton weapon load !
 
Su-34 is a bomber; it's not good in air-to-air dogfights. It has a high RCS, no supercruise capabilities, and no AESA radars. It will need a lot of upgrades if we want to induct it into our air force.
 
India does not need any new types of aircraft but should focus on radars, unmanned reconnaissance, suicide attack drones and strike drones, low-cost missiles, space-based surveillance, indigenous aircraft products, etc.
 
Instead India should opt for fast track supplies of SU57, SU35 and S70 Okhotnik (with complete ToT and local manufacturing) as gap filler. At least 3 squadrons of both to really amp the anti of depleting squadron strengths of IAF. This itself will take minimum 2-3 years, by then we shall have our Tejas fleet with substantial numbers. I believe DRDO should not phase out on Ghatak it is as much important for IAF. Lets hope something really comes along well in this deal respect. My stand on Rafael will never change without source code and indegenius munitions in Rafael its burder on IAF and undoubtedly its an overly hyped fighter. In coming years if all goes well Tejas Mk2 will out perform Rafael. IAF should go for and fund for Tejas Mk1 and Mk2 with proper engine choice instead of Rafael.
 
India should colaborate for engine technologies with two three suppliers easy to say but we should definitely try, as heard one good news is we are seaking to colobrate with SAFRAN for Tejas Mk2. This will be a nice preposition as SAFRAN powers Rafael, Tejas Mk2 is same in line to Rafael 4.5 gen. Only difference is the engine, Rafael is twin but Tejas is one. I feel we should go for higher kN engine for Tejas Mk2 (about 130) this shall match the Rafael.
 
India doesn’t need this type of jet at all. Once we upgrade the Sukhoi jets with our indigenous technology then it will be much better than what the Sukhoi 34 jet can ever give us. We should also heavily upgrade our Mig 29 jets with similar technology to extend its lifespan as it will still be in service for the next 10+ years or more. We should also do the same for our naval Mig 29K jets.

This will buy us enough time so we can complete developing, testing and manufacturing the Tejas MK2 jets in sufficient squadron numbers.
I agree with you on the Sukhoi upgrades, and absolutely disagree on the MiG-29s. The MiG-29 is an aging platform that needs replacement soon. Trying to upgrade it to retain it for another decade past the late 2030s will only get us another MiG-21 saga. Moreover, even the newest MiG-29 airframes we have date back to the early 1990s. By the late 2030s, these will all be at the end of their usable life.
 
Can anyone please help me to know what exactly Make in India and Atmanirbhar products is with respect to Indian Airforce. Is this idea really gaining pace and really helping for Airforce. I mean we are able to see a remarkable progress with this idea in respect to case of Navy and Army. Airforce and GOI is some what lagging behind for Airforce, it is clear that Godrej has already supplied two KDE to DRDO, the first test flight of Ghatak was planned in June 2025. The project is still in files awaiting the CCS approvals. Why we are involving buerocratic structure in such key projects. Why are we not in hurry for these kind of projects. PMO not getting involved directly in such projects is the big disadvantages.

Ghatak is one such project along with Kaveri 2.0 jet engine which should be funded and made fast track.

Since this is an open forum and platform to discuss and share information can anyone put light on the fate of Ghatak project please.
 
Su-34 is a bomber; it's not good in air-to-air dogfights. It has a high RCS, no supercruise capabilities, and no AESA radars. It will need a lot of upgrades if we want to induct it into our air force.
Bomber, right? It will be a light-weight, compact, but agile version of the same Tu-160!
 
We might not need it, but if a bomber is really needed, we will either have:

a Tu-160
OR
a Su-34, but by replacing the following:
  • Existing PESA radar with Uttam/Virupaksha AESA radar
  • Engine replacement from the existing AL-31FM1 with the New Product-177S
  • All other new tech that are being developed for the Super-30 Sukhoi Flanker programme
 
I agree with you on the Sukhoi upgrades, and absolutely disagree on the MiG-29s. The MiG-29 is an aging platform that needs replacement soon. Trying to upgrade it to retain it for another decade past the late 2030s will only get us another MiG-21 saga. Moreover, even the newest MiG-29 airframes we have date back to the early 1990s. By the late 2030s, these will all be at the end of their usable life.
Yes it’s not desirable to maintain the Mig 29 to serve until 2035-2040 but if we are unable to manufacture enough Tejas MK1A and MK2 jets then we have no choice but to. With the current manufacturing delays and inconsistent and unreliable performance of HAL it’s still unclear when they will be ready to manufacture the Tejas MK2 and AMCA prototypes or first flight. It’s highly unlikely they will be able to manufacture enough jets on time and get them certified which takes years of testing and refinement.

Realistically we should undertake a comprehensive upgrade of the MIg 29 air frames, upgrades or replacement entirely while we still can. Also a jet's lifespan isn’t measured only on the number of years it was made to exist but in the number of hours it flies, flight speed used, weapons it carries etc.

Also you’re forgetting about our Mig 29K which is the only naval jets we have. We need to upgrade the technology and lifespan of those jets at least until 2040 which hopefully by then the TEDBF would be ready for production to start in sufficient numbers. So most of the technology we develop for the Mig 29 or Mig 29K can be shared between them and save us on unnecessary development and manufacturing costs.
 
Are they trolling us? Su-30's carrying capacity is 8t, Rafale is 9.5t. This thing is 8t. What's the point? There is really no fit for a strategic bomber. During the recent Iranian op, Israel first achieved air superiority. Iran pretty much doesn't have any decent AF/AD. For bullying tiny countries like these, sure, a bomber can be used. They dropped GBU-57 with an explosive payload weight of 2.4t. We can deliver 7.5t through Agni 5. GBU-57 relies on gravity, whereas Agni 5 will hit at Mach 24. GBU-57 is not even comparable.

The other point is the liability. If we don't manage it properly, it will become a liability, as seen through Op Spider. Losing one will hit us hard. Not sure what the cost of an Su-34 is, but for a Tu-160, it will be very expensive if we lose it.
 
We might not need it, but if a bomber is really needed, we will either have:

a Tu-160
OR
a Su-34, but by replacing the following:
  • Existing PESA radar with Uttam/Virupaksha AESA radar
  • Engine replacement from the existing AL-31FM1 with the New Product-177S
  • All other new tech that are being developed for the Super-30 Sukhoi Flanker programme
No, we will get neither type. One may as well just use a couple of fighters together instead. The Su-34 has received an absolute pasting in Ukraine.
 
Even Russia can't afford to buy 2 squadrons of TU160M seeing its price. One or two bombers are sufficient.
No, we do not need any Tu-160Ms. One or two bombers would only be an expensive logistical nightmare, and we do not have a strategic need for such bombers.
 
No, we will get neither type. One may as well just use a couple of fighters together instead. The Su-34 has received an absolute pasting in Ukraine.
Yes, I know. Yet, they are producing too many of these, and AL-41 replacement has been officially proposed. The problem with Tu-160 is the MASSIVE engine (55K pounds thrust with afterburners). We don't have the infrastructure for this though, yet if you say only fighters are enough, okay.
 
India doesn’t need this type of jet at all. Once we upgrade the Sukhoi jets with our indigenous technology then it will be much better than what the Sukhoi 34 jet can ever give us. We should also heavily upgrade our Mig 29 jets with similar technology to extend its lifespan as it will still be in service for the next 10+ years or more. We should also do the same for our naval Mig 29K jets.

This will buy us enough time so we can complete developing, testing and manufacturing the Tejas MK2 jets in sufficient squadron numbers.
 
Heavy bombers are with 4 countries , USA, Russia and China and once upon a time Britain with Vulcan. France Israel have non but do air campaign frequently.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,977
Messages
54,943
Members
3,777
Latest member
kratika
Back
Top