Tejas Fighter Jet Suffers First Crash After 23 Years of Accident-Free Record

India's domestically developed Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas suffered a significant setback today, experiencing its first crash after a remarkable 23-year run of accident-free operation. The incident occurred during an operational training sortie in the Jaisalmer region of Rajasthan.

The aircraft, reportedly a Tejas in its Final Operational Configuration (FOC) and part of the Indian Air Force's No. 18 Flying Bullets squadron, crashed under circumstances that are still being investigated. The pilot successfully ejected from the aircraft and is reported to be safe.

Milestone Marred​

The Tejas program has been a source of pride for India's aerospace industry, recently celebrating 10,000 accident-free sorties. This crash marks a stark turning point in the aircraft's operational history.

Investigation Underway​

The Indian Air Force has swiftly ordered a Court of Inquiry (CoI) to meticulously examine the events leading up to the crash and identify the root cause. Preliminary analysis of available footage suggests the aircraft may have been attempting a takeoff or emergency landing, as its landing gears appeared deployed.

Intriguingly, the absence of visible smoke and a continued engine roar in the footage raise questions about potential scenarios. Unresponsive controls, electrical failure, or engine flameout are possibilities the investigation will need to explore.

Tejas: A Symbol of Progress​

The LCA Tejas program stands as a testament to India's growing prowess in aerospace design and manufacturing. This crash, while a setback, is unlikely to derail the larger ambitions of the program or India's defence modernization efforts.

The findings of the Court of Inquiry will be crucial in understanding the cause of this incident and taking steps to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

 

[Akshat]

They have to explain why pilot bailed for the plane was moving slowly with landing gear down.

And the plane was moving left and right uncontrollably. The pilot should have stayed inside and k!led himself?

 

[Pink Panther]

a black mark, probably due to the new digital fly by wire software, it is well known that it had some issues, but still it's a good test of Martin Backer ejection seat in Tejas application, otherwise how would we test this.

 

[Pink Panther]

significant number of accidents happen during training.

Rafale's crashed many times when they were developed and again during deployments, they still sell them, so one crash is nothing.

 

[Pink Panther]

Only Rafale has no accidents .

yes not just one time, but many times.

 

[Sudha]

Seriously? 23 years? The aircraft was inducted in 2015. Pre induction there were few flying hours to make it count. So actually it should be 8 years.

 

[Sudha]

Seems to be pilots error or some health issues with the pilot such as heart attack or brain stroke.

"Instant analysis" by instant karma a keyboard warrior. LOL!!

 

[Sudha]

May b they are testing ejection seat working??

Nope they wanted to check whether it canbe unmanned.

 

[kumar]

Initial reports pointing at engine failure. Let's wait for enquiry report.

 

[The_rED_dEVIL]

Its ok. The more the aircraft is flown and the more numbers are built, more chance of this record to be broken.

Indeed, but my question is the aircraft was still gliding, then is it not to early for the pilot to eject out of the aircraft?

Anyways let's wait for the result of the inquiry.

 

[Akhil]

Then how did he follow the SOP to perfection? Most likely this was a manufacturing error by HAL.

Apparently It was engine failure. Now HAL has started manufacturing Tejas engines too? Now any kind words against engine manufacturer?

 

[Vijay Anand]

The number of units built in 23 years is even more remarkable, just not in a good way.

10k+ flying hours is not a good number? Please go ahead and try your luck in video games, coz that's where you'll get your "remarkable" numbers.

 

[Yeagerist]

hope itz not something serious like Dhruv

 

[Rajsn]

Seems to be pilots error or some health issues with the pilot such as heart attack or brain stroke.

Wow . Please share your Special Privileged information Report.
Anythingto cover for substandard HAL product forced on IAF .

 

[beencensured]

And the plane was moving left and right uncontrollably. The pilot should have stayed inside and k!led himself?

You saw the video on the right-side plain field, roads, he flew into buildings. Further. it was slow with landing gear down. If someone got hurt, they would have blamed pilot as he should make effort to maneuver to unpopulated area.

 

[Apocalypse gupta]

Indeed, but my question is the aircraft was still gliding, then is it not to early for the pilot to eject out of the aircraft?

Anyways let's wait for the result of the inquiry.

I think the pilot is trained to eject if he loses control of aircraft and it is not over populated area. The plane was at pretty low altitude, so the pilot waited to eject and was trying to regain control or to avoid populated area

 

[Tabaahi]

a black mark, probably due to the new digital fly by wire software, it is well known that it had some issues, but still it's a good test of Martin Backer ejection seat in Tejas application, otherwise how would we test this.

New FBW has been tested on aircraft only in March this year for mk1a config so I believe this jet is on mk1. Not sure though.

 

[Battle student]

Can an autopilot system be implemented for the tejas that only activates if the pilots eject?

 

[Mridul baruah]

The pilots did exactly what they are taught to do. First the co pilot exited, then the pilot. So clearly the pilot wasn’t at all at fault. Most likely a manufacturing error on the part of HAL like always.

Single seater mein double sawari. Auto samajh rakkha hai kya?

 

[Prashu Sam]

HAL got the excuse for delay now. First they say Feb then march and recent news that April-24 for delivery of first 2 Mk1A. You can see what is coming in future

 

[Prashu Sam]

Seriously? 23 years? The aircraft was inducted in 2015. Pre induction there were few flying hours to make it count. So actually it should be 8 years.

True, the real flying hours in past 5-8 years only so we can not really claim 23 years. In fact Program began in 1983 so if you can even claim 40 years