Urgent Calls for Kaveri 2.0 Intensify as Tariff Threats Exposes India's Reliance on US Engines for Tejas and AMCA as Strategic Vulnerability

Urgent Calls for Kaveri 2.0 Intensify as Tariff Threats Exposes India's Reliance on US Engines for Tejas and AMCA as Strategic Vulnerability


Recent trade disputes between India and the United States have brought a critical aspect of India's military modernisation into sharp focus: its dependence on American jet engine technology.

This reliance on the U.S.-made General Electric (GE) engines for the indigenous Tejas fighter jet program is now being seen as a significant strategic vulnerability, prompting renewed and urgent calls to fast-track the development of India's own Kaveri 2.0 engine.

Defence analysts argue that to achieve true strategic autonomy and secure its flagship aviation projects, India must prioritise the indigenous Kaveri 2.0. This next-generation power plant, designed to produce 90-95 kilonewtons (kN) of thrust, is being positioned as a long-term solution.

A successful Kaveri 2.0 could power future fleets of Tejas Mk1A and Mk2 aircraft, significantly reducing dependence on foreign suppliers, lowering procurement and operational costs, and potentially opening new avenues for defence exports.

While the India-U.S. strategic partnership has deepened in recent years, particularly in defence cooperation, it is not immune to geopolitical shifts and economic disagreements. The ongoing tariff impositions and retaliatory measures could potentially spill over into the defence sector.

Historically, the U.S. has often balanced its relationships in South Asia, and any strategic realignment could jeopardise the stable supply of critical military hardware to India. This uncertainty makes over-reliance on a single country for a core technology a high-risk proposition for India's national security.

This vulnerability directly impacts the backbone of the Indian Air Force's modernisation plan.

The Tejas Mk1A fleet currently operates on the American GE F-404 engine, which produces approximately 84 kN of thrust. The more advanced Tejas Mk2, a 4.5-generation fighter, is slated to be powered by the more powerful GE F-414 engine, capable of 98 kN of thrust.

A landmark deal was recently announced for GE to co-produce these F-414 engines in India with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). However, any disruption to this agreement due to sanctions or policy changes could severely delay or cripple these vital programs.

The original Kaveri engine was developed by the Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE), a laboratory under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

The project was intended to power the Tejas but was officially delinked from the program after it failed to meet the required thrust and reliability standards within the stipulated timeframe.

Despite these earlier setbacks, the technology and expertise gained are now being leveraged for the development of the Kaveri 2.0, which aims to provide a viable, homegrown alternative to the imported GE engines.

Successfully developing the Kaveri 2.0 would insulate India's critical defence projects from external political pressures.

An indigenous engine ensures that the production lines for the Tejas Mk2 and, crucially, the futuristic Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), India’s fifth-generation stealth fighter program, can proceed without interruption, regardless of shifts in international diplomacy.

This capability is the essence of strategic independence in defence manufacturing.

From an operational and logistical standpoint, a domestically produced engine offers immense benefits.

If the Kaveri 2.0, with its 90-95kN thrust, is designed as a "drop-in" replacement, it could potentially be used to power both the Tejas Mk1A and Mk2 variants.

This standardisation would streamline the maintenance and supply chain for the Indian Air Force, reducing costs, simplifying training for ground crews, and ultimately increasing the operational readiness of the fighter fleet.

The economic advantages are equally compelling. Imported engines like the F-414 come with a high price tag, often costing millions of dollars per unit, which drains valuable foreign exchange reserves. An indigenous engine produced at scale would be significantly more cost-effective.

Moreover, a combat-proven Indian engine would make the Tejas fighter a more attractive and self-contained package for export to friendly nations, boosting India’s ambitions to become a net exporter of defence hardware.
 
US can never ever be a reliant partner, do not know when India will realise this? Probably when all plans will be destroyed completely. Tejas is in very vulnerable situation at present. As per Peter Navarro there is a large possibility that the ToT for GE engines will ne blocked. There is still time to relook, rethink and recalibrate the deal. Any jet engine deal for Indian jets with US is going to kill the project. We have to really work hard and in a smart manner, along with private sector to bring Kaveri 2.0 in physical appearance probably within one year. This may sound optimestic but no way forward or else forget the Tejas existance. AMCA is relitavey far so still time to get the engine done for AMCA.

US now closing in with pakistan is absolutely bullshit in the defence sector for India.
 
Everybody can see it except HAL and Govt. US could never be trusted and can resort to blackmail any time in the future. Go for Kaveri Hammer and tong. Government must provide the necessary funds including for testbed. But commission khors will not allow it to happen.
 
Better ask IAF whether they r ready to fly a fighter with Indian engine?IAF is more inclined towards firangi maal.Few years back they were very reluctant to use indian made component which suddenly changed with Modi government AATMANIRBHARTA campaign.But gradually & slowly they understand that if u want to fight any war it can't be done on firangi maal but to have own defence industry who can save u in a war scenario.
 
Everybody can see it except HAL and Govt. US could never be trusted and can resort to blackmail any time in the future. Go for Kaveri Hammer and tong. Government must provide the necessary funds including for testbed. But commission khors will not allow it to happen.
Congress chose the engines in 2008, but bjp and hal still has time
 
Everybody can see it except HAL and Govt. US could never be trusted and can resort to blackmail any time in the future. Go for Kaveri Hammer and tong. Government must provide the necessary funds including for testbed. But commission khors will not allow it to happen.
Why is India not considering the Eurojet EJ200 made by Rolls-Royce? The UK is a more reliable provider for India than the US any day. They may also be more interested in a joint development, design and production program for advanced engines. More generally, India can be to Britain what China is to the US: a massive production as well as consumption source.
 
India is ar cross roads in its attempt to producing advanced technology engines to power its advanced variant fighters. This setbacks are the results of its own doings because they were not proactive in their foresight and planning based forecast on various aspects including volatile geopolitics. There are prices to pay for failures this is what exactly is happening right now. Too complacent not prioritising future developments. You just cannot rush to produce an ideal Kaveri engine project with 90Kn thrust bcoz we need to have the technology, expertise and experience. It seems to me we don't have the right people with these necessary requirements to build an advanced technology engines with 90 Kn thrust. This is just my suggestion maybe it's not feasible. Just strip open up one F414 engine study throughly and adopt the technology. Another option is to forego the 80 percent ToT engine technology collaboration with GE and quickly deliberate on the negotiations with Rolls Royce or Japanese IHI XF9-1 for a quick solution. For heaven's sake don't be very dependent on Safran all the time as though there are no others better than them.
 
India is ar cross roads in its attempt to producing advanced technology engines to power its advanced variant fighters. This setbacks are the results of its own doings because they were not proactive in their foresight and planning based forecast on various aspects including volatile geopolitics. There are prices to pay for failures this is what exactly is happening right now. Too complacent not prioritising future developments. You just cannot rush to produce an ideal Kaveri engine project with 90Kn thrust bcoz we need to have the technology, expertise and experience. It seems to me we don't have the right people with these necessary requirements to build an advanced technology engines with 90 Kn thrust. This is just my suggestion maybe it's not feasible. Just strip open up one F414 engine study throughly and adopt the technology. Another option is to forego the 80 percent ToT engine technology collaboration with GE and quickly deliberate on the negotiations with Rolls Royce or Japanese IHI XF9-1 for a quick solution. For heaven's sake don't be very dependent on Safran all the time as though there are no others better than them.
Britain is not allowed to transfer EJ200 technology without permission from Germany, Italy and Spain, while Safran depends only on the French government.
 
I would like to say a few things.

1. When USSR disintegrated, IAF faced lot of issues regarding servicing and spare parts for our MiG aircraft.

2. India opted to produce some of these parts indigenously, but it resulted in failure of these parts and many accidents and incidents.

3. The Tejas is designed to accommodate GE engine. It's not easy to change the engine. Biden administration halted the supply of GE engineers and that's why fir the last five years HAL could not deliver any Tejas

4. Now the supply is resumed and two engines per months will be delivered. IAF is going to acquire appx 100 more Tejas so it will take another four to five years at normal place to get these engines.

5. The unpredictable Trump can't be trusted. USA itself has been an unreliable partner for all is friends throughout its history.

6. An aircraft frame uses appx four engines in its operational lifetime. Because engine's life is much shorter than the airframe's life.

7. In case of accident/ incident involving engine, we may need some more engines.

8. Now you can do the math, how many engines we need. And how long do we need the support for servicing and spare parts. That's why india is asking for joint production and transfer of technology.

9. Changing engine and supplier will be cumbersome and it will push back the Tejas programme by several years. Airframe has to be redesigned to fit the alternative engine. Many trials to be conducted to ensure that the engine is Coupling perfectly.Flyworthy certificate again needs to be taken. And so on..

10. Lastly, I would say that India is too deep with GE in it. But for any future aircraft, we should stay away from USA. Unfortunately Kaveri 2 is still decades away. However fast-tracked it maybe, it won't be available for Tejas.
 
The US has never been a technology associate for India; it's an open secret.
God only knows why Indian policy makers and people at the defence ministry are after American defence technology purchases.
It's never been a cost-effective solution, and if we become US-dependent, we will never be self-reliant. Additionally, we will permanently face threats of US sanctions.
Purchase of GE jet engines or Apache gunships is absolutely nonsensical.
France 🇫🇷 would be our only option for advanced technology support. However, the Russian 🇷🇺 option is always open to us.
However, India should never opt for the US, Britain and Canada for association in the defence sector. Those people always lure you to ditch you in the future, and they are an unreliable human race.
 
The US has never been a technology associate for India; it's an open secret.
God only knows why Indian policy makers and people at the defence ministry are after American defence technology purchases.
It's never been a cost-effective solution, and if we become US-dependent, we will never be self-reliant. Additionally, we will permanently face threats of US sanctions.
Purchase of GE jet engines or Apache gunships is absolutely nonsensical.
France 🇫🇷 would be our only option for advanced technology support. However, the Russian 🇷🇺 option is always open to us.
However, India should never opt for the US, Britain and Canada for association in the defence sector. Those people always lure you to ditch you in the future, and they are an unreliable human race.
Besides the Safran M88 and Saturn AL-51, there is also the IHI XF9. If India is willing to pay to see it through to completion, it will be a very valuable asset for AMCA. India has already missed out on lucrative deals: Brandner E-300 in the 60s, Ivchenko AI-9500F in the 00-10s.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,363
Messages
57,509
Members
4,080
Latest member
Aloha
Back
Top