Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Signals Partnership with French Safran for AMCA Engine Co-Development

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Signals Partnership with French Safran for AMCA Engine Co-Development


In a major development for India's military aviation programme, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has confirmed an upcoming collaboration with the French engine manufacturer Safran to jointly develop and produce a new jet engine.

This engine is slated to power India's futuristic fifth-generation fighter jet, the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA).

The revelation, made at the ET World Leaders Forum, marks a critical step forward in India’s long-standing goal of achieving self-reliance in critical defence technology.

Speaking on the government's strategic vision, Mr. Singh emphasised the shift towards domestic manufacturing for crucial military hardware.

"We have also moved towards manufacturing the aircraft’s engine in India itself. We are about to start engine manufacturing work in India with the French company Safran," he stated.

This partnership is designed to reduce India's long-term dependence on foreign nations for advanced military aero-engines, a technology that only a few countries have mastered.

Safran is a globally recognised leader in aerospace propulsion and is the manufacturer of the M88 engine used in the Rafale fighter jets, which are already in service with the Indian Air Force.

The new agreement is expected to be a comprehensive partnership involving a 100% transfer of technology for the design, development, and manufacturing of the engine within India.

This collaboration builds upon the strong existing strategic ties between India and France and will likely be led by India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

The proposed engine is being developed to meet the demanding performance requirements of the AMCA, a stealth aircraft designed for air superiority and strike missions.

It is projected to be a 110-kilonewton (kN) thrust class engine, enabling features such as supercruise (supersonic flight without afterburners), advanced stealth capabilities, and high agility.

While the initial prototypes of the AMCA may be powered by an existing foreign engine, this joint venture with Safran is crucial for producing the more advanced Mk2 version of the aircraft, ensuring its future capabilities are supported by domestically produced technology.
 
This is the best bit of 'good news' after what we've seen happening with GE's handling of the 404 engine supplies.
It also means that they had better stick to timelines where the 414 engine is concerned.

Competition is always good : keeps suppliers on their toes and furthers innovation and new versions.

Hopefully the 100% ToT for all phases of the engine's production will come about and it will be more powerful (at 110 kN +) which will give it an edge over the 414 engine. and permit incorporation in the later Mk2 version of the AMCA.
We also hope to see some stealth issues addressed during its manufacture.
 
Better late than suffer later...India had to factor in and develop an effective mechanism to offset delays in engine deliveries by GE...
 
Better late than suffer later...India had to factor in and develop an effective mechanism to offset delays in engine deliveries by GE...

Actually, there is very little that can be done for suppliers located abroad.
We can only twist their tails if they are on Indian soil.
We all know that the don is running amok and is doing his best to spite India, mollycoddling the Pakis in the process.

Besides, jet-engines are a 'preserve' of only a few nations - some of them don't want to see us join this 'elite' club and go on to produce world-beating products.

In this regard, the Russian offer (with full Tot) of local production of the AL-41 jet-engine shouldn't be permitted to slip through our fingers.

If our plate is already piled high with what SAFRAN has served, then we should hive off the AL-41 offer to TATAs or some pvt industry co, if the Russky's are amenable to this.
Difficult, but, doable.
 
Safran can develop an engine much more powerful than the M88. Critics of this engine forget how compact it is and what aircraft it was originally intended for (and this aircraft was supposed to be based on aircraft carriers). AMCA does not require such strict size restrictions, therefore the new engine can be made larger and more powerful. Even if you look at the past, Snecma (Safran) already made a more powerful engine called the M53, it is just much larger than the M88.

If the AMCA engines are allowed to have dimensions of F100/110, then the IHI XF9 fits into these conditions.
 
Actually, there is very little that can be done for suppliers located abroad.
We can only twist their tails if they are on Indian soil.
We all know that the don is running amok and is doing his best to spite India, mollycoddling the Pakis in the process.

Besides, jet-engines are a 'preserve' of only a few nations - some of them don't want to see us join this 'elite' club and go on to produce world-beating products.

In this regard, the Russian offer (with full Tot) of local production of the AL-41 jet-engine shouldn't be permitted to slip through our fingers.

If our plate is already piled high with what SAFRAN has served, then we should hive off the AL-41 offer to TATAs or some pvt industry co, if the Russky's are amenable to this.
Difficult, but, doable.
Egypt was willing to cooperate with India on the E300 engine in the 1960s, which was intended for the Marut fighter, Ukraine offered to develop a 95 kN thrust engine for the Tejas in the 2000s, but India often missed such opportunities for cooperation.
 
Safran can develop an engine much more powerful than the M88. Critics of this engine forget how compact it is and what aircraft it was originally intended for (and this aircraft was supposed to be based on aircraft carriers). AMCA does not require such strict size restrictions, therefore the new engine can be made larger and more powerful. Even if you look at the past, Snecma (Safran) already made a more powerful engine called the M53, it is just much larger than the M88.

If the AMCA engines are allowed to have dimensions of F100/110, then the IHI XF9 fits into these conditions.

The media has not been 'wised up' to details of the engine that is going to be co-produced.
Whether it is one of their existing products, suitably modified/tailored to AMCA requirements, only time will tell.
Till then, we wait with bated breath!
 
Egypt was willing to cooperate with India on the E300 engine in the 1960s, which was intended for the Marut fighter, Ukraine offered to develop a 95 kN thrust engine for the Tejas in the 2000s, but India often missed such opportunities for cooperation.

Egypt ! That's news to me; was possibly not into 'matters flying' then.
But, I'd say, it'd be a case of the blind leading the blind as both nations were not producers of jet-engines!
No offence intended.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
5,398
Messages
57,696
Members
4,098
Latest member
natraj643817
Back
Top