Analysis Evaluating a "Made in India" Rafale F4: Could Local Production Costs Undercut France Despite Significant Technology Transfer Expenses?

Evaluating a Made in India Rafale F4: Could Local Production Costs Undercut France Despite Significant Technology Transfer Expenses?


The United Arab Emirates' substantial $18 billion agreement for 80 Rafale F4 fighter jets, signed in December 2021 with France's Dassault Aviation, represents the largest export order for this advanced aircraft.

This deal, including helicopters and support, has intensified discussions about the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of manufacturing the Rafale F4 in India under the nation's Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative, especially as India aims to strengthen its air and naval forces.

Using the UAE contract as a reference point, this analysis explores the potential costs and challenges of domestically producing the Rafale F4, considering India's specific defence requirements and industrial landscape.

Understanding the Benchmark: The UAE Rafale F4 Deal​

The UAE's $18 billion package secures 80 Rafale F4 aircraft, alongside extensive support, logistics, training, spare parts, and weapons integration, with deliveries expected from 2027. This equates to roughly $225 million per aircraft.

However, this figure includes significant non-airframe elements like munitions, maintenance infrastructure, and comprehensive support packages, which typically constitute 30-40% of such deals. Adjusting for these factors, the estimated 'flyaway cost' (the cost of the aircraft itself) for a UAE Rafale F4 likely falls between $140 million and $160 million.

The F4 variant represents a considerable advancement over the F3R standard currently operated by the Indian Air Force (IAF), featuring upgrades like enhanced Thales RBE2 AESA radar, improved electronic warfare suites, advanced sensors (including a new IRST), superior network connectivity, and integration of newer weapons like the MICA NG missile and 1,000kg AASM Hammer munitions.

Cost Factors for a "Made-in-India" Rafale F4​

Establishing Rafale F4 production in India, likely involving Dassault and an Indian partner such as Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) or the existing Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited (DRAL) venture, would face several unique cost dynamics:
  1. Economies of Scale: The UAE's 80-aircraft order allows for cost efficiencies through large-scale production. India would need a similarly substantial order, potentially the 114 jets envisioned for the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) requirement or the recently discussed additional 40 jets for the IAF, to achieve comparable per-unit pricing. Recent reports suggest India might pursue a Government-to-Government deal for these additional Rafales, potentially streamlining the process but still requiring significant volume for cost benefits in local production.
  2. Local Manufacturing Savings: Domestic production offers potential savings on labour and facility costs compared to France. HAL's past experience with licensed production (like the Su-30 MKI) suggests assembly and integration savings could reach 10-20%. However, critical high-technology components, particularly engines (which can account for 30-40% of a jet's cost), advanced avionics, and radar systems, would likely still be imported initially, limiting overall savings to perhaps 15-25% compared to French manufacturing.
  3. Technology Transfer and Setup Costs: Unlike the UAE deal, India would mandate extensive technology transfer for local production, a key point in past negotiations like the original MMRCA competition. Establishing a dedicated production line, training specialised personnel, and covering licensing fees represent significant upfront investments, estimated at $2-3 billion. Amortized over a hypothetical 100-jet run, this adds approximately $20-30 million to each aircraft's cost. Dassault has previously indicated a minimum order of 100 units would be necessary to justify setting up a full assembly line in India, potentially through an expanded DRAL facility, over which it might seek full control to ensure quality standards, recalling past disagreements during MMRCA talks regarding HAL's production.
  4. India-Specific Enhancements (ISE): India's initial 36 Rafales included around $2 billion worth of specific modifications (like Israeli helmet displays). A future Indian Rafale F4 would almost certainly require further customisation, such as integrating indigenous systems like the Astra missile or adapting to unique IAF/Navy operational doctrines. These enhancements could add another $15-20 million per aircraft.
  5. Offset Obligations: India's defence procurement policies typically mandate significant reinvestment (offsets) into the local defence industry, often 30-50% of the contract value for competitive bids, although rules differ for G2G deals. While fostering domestic industry, meeting these obligations can inflate the prime contractor's costs as they establish local partnerships and supply chains. For a deal mirroring the UAE's value, this could imply $5.4-9 billion in offset commitments, potentially adding around 10% to the overall cost structure as Dassault integrates Indian partners like L&T, Mahindra, Kalyani Group, and Godrej & Boyce further into the supply chain. However, the effectiveness of offsets in transferring high-end technology versus simple buy-backs remains a point of discussion.

Estimated Cost Scenario​

Based on these factors and using the adjusted UAE flyaway cost as a starting point, a tentative cost structure for 100 "Made-in-India" Rafale F4 jets could look like this:
  • Base Flyaway Cost: $140 million/jet × 100 = $14 billion
  • Technology Transfer/Setup: $2.5 billion (or $25 million/jet)
  • India-Specific Enhancements: $1.5 billion (or $15 million/jet)
  • Offset-Related Cost Inflation (est. 10%): $1.4 billion
  • Support & Logistics (est. 20% of airframe cost): $3 billion
This rough estimate places the total program cost around $22.4 billion, translating to approximately $224 million per aircraft, including support but reflecting the heavy initial investment in local production capabilities. This figure is within the broad $15-40 billion range sometimes cited for the MRFA program, though those figures often encompass wider lifecycle costs.

While potentially higher per unit initially than a direct import (like the 2016 deal's inflation-adjusted $122 million flyaway cost), the strategic goal involves building long-term industrial capability alongside acquiring the aircraft.

Ultimately, while local labour offers savings, the substantial costs associated with technology transfer, establishing production infrastructure, meeting offset requirements, and incorporating specific enhancements mean that a "Made-in-India" Rafale F4 might only become significantly cost-competitive with direct imports if production volumes are very large, potentially including export orders facilitated by a robust indigenous supply chain.
 
The GoI should seriously move to conclude the deal for 114 MRFA procurement as soon as possible without dragging its feet any longer. It has done too much talking but very little progress for more than a decade.

Carry out all the necessary negotiations favourable to India, like manufacturing in India, including producing aircraft parts. Go for hard-pressed negotiations bringing benefits to local industries.

If the French are adamant about their terms and conditions, then it is time for India to stop cozying up to the French. There are always other better options available in the market like Eurofighter.

Rafale may seem to be the best choice for IAF, but the French have to be considerate with India being one of the repeated customers of French military procurements. The GoI should seriously enter into negotiations with the right bargaining power on the table to counter the French.

We can't wait for Tejas to stopgap the declining fighter squadrons. We can't pick on 5th-gen fighters too because F-35 is not a possible acquisition for various reasons, and Su-57 is not a proven 5th-gen stealth fighter just yet. So, a 5th-gen fighter is not the correct option in the critical situation we are in right now.
 
Buddy..Loads of extra goodies are included. Way more than UAE
Yes, we got nothing and later at double the cost brought hammer missiles from french airforce second hand . Nothing comes free ,nothing called free lunch , specially who pay double for what's not .
 
Nothing of nothing is something , what goodies came is some naked Rafales who had to halt in UAE and nearly got destroyed by Iranian missiles, that rained on the base when they landed . So get real and state facts .
 
UAE being size of Goa has purchased 80 Rafael, we purchased only 36 at the cost of 80 and now talk economic is defence procurement,this is a joke only one shopkeeper can tell other of how to buy costly item , spending twice the money , yet show all how good deal it is.
Do you know how much UAE paid per piece and also their technical specs? Don't try to malign an honest effort
 
Do you know how much UAE paid per piece and also their technical specs? Don't try to malign an honest effort
Don't say honest effort, say poor effort to buy so less when more could have in same price as 36 had the order been large and we need not place what's happening again .
 
Last edited:
Do you know how much UAE paid per piece and also their technical specs? Don't try to malign an honest effort
UAE paid 18 billion for 80 jets, tech specs are 4th generation Rafael , we have 2ed generation Rafael , UAE has 80, we have 36 and cost is surely per aircaft is more for us then as less in quantity, so talk per aircraft cost and older generation too .
 
Do you know how much UAE paid per piece and also their technical specs? Don't try to malign an honest effort
Did some math , some 8.84 billion USD we paid for 36, 2ed generation Rafael jets, UAE paid 18 billion for 80 latest 4th gen Rafel jets, so if we were to buy that 2ed generation 80 jets ,then per jet cost would surely be more than what's being paid by UAE . UAE paid 225 million USD per 4th gen jet, we paid 245 million for 2ed generation jet, so per jet we paid 20 million more and yet only got 36 anyways so poor deal in anyway, financial or defense wise.
 
Last edited:
What is your calculation? How many Rafels we could have purchased for the money we paid? The courts have gone through the papers and the price was compared with the previous dispensations deal. As the IAF needed special features in mountaneous region the cost went up. Further TOT is included. Even for these 36 jets the opposition cried and went to courts. It was almost nothing but blockade by the opposition. So poor Govt had to rely on the ineffective and incapable white elephant called HAL . This make in India company started by Nehru is yet to make proper Samosas sorry Tejas
 
What is your calculation? How many Rafels we could have purchased for the money we paid? The courts have gone through the papers and the price was compared with the previous dispensations deal. As the IAF needed special features in mountaneous region the cost went up. Further TOT is included. Even for these 36 jets the opposition cried and went to courts. It was almost nothing but blockade by the opposition. So poor Govt had to rely on the ineffective and incapable white elephant called HAL . This make in India company started by Nehru is yet to make proper Samosas sorry Tejas
Its not money in defence of country but adequate number , pay double ,no problem but why buy less, then again buy now , 36 is no jet strength for anything. Nehru was then , what's happened has been poor foresight of yes men in defence spending matter. Get real, we are at our weakest since independence in defence sector,lagging behind all leading powers by 50 years, still using 1960s tech.
 
Its not money in defence of country but adequate number , pay double ,no problem but why buy less, then again buy now , 36 is no jet strength for anything. Nehru was then , what's happened has been poor foresight of yes men in defence spending matter. Get real, we are at our weakest since independence in defence sector,lagging behind all leading powers by 50 years, still using 1960s tech.
Can't make one turboprop engine of an aeromodel.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to my Indian friends. PAF is performing very well with small budget. Your Tejas is yet to perform but JF 17 is flying worldwide. Now we have J-10C and you are still thinking despite having money in pocket. As on today no match of IAF to PAF. PAF is far ahead of IAF. I suggest not to waste billion of dollors on these toys instead India may save this amount by negotiating Pakistan. We will also save billion dollars. What you people say...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,659
Messages
49,795
Members
3,131
Latest member
Loki 20
Back
Top