Opinion How Current Reliance on Gravity Bombs Makes IAF's Nuclear Retaliation Vulnerable, Highlighting Need for Air-Launched Nuclear Missiles

How Current Reliance on Gravity Bombs Makes IAF's Nuclear Retaliation Vulnerable, Highlighting Need for Air-Launched Nuclear Missiles


The Indian Air Force (IAF), a crucial part of India's nuclear deterrent strategy, currently relies on fighter aircraft like the Mirage 2000, Jaguar, and potentially the Rafale to deliver nuclear weapons. However, these aircraft are presently equipped to use gravity-based nuclear bombs, a method requiring them to fly dangerously close to their targets.

This approach raises concerns about the safety and success rate of missions, especially against adversaries with modern air defence systems. Experts suggest that adopting air-launched nuclear-capable missiles is essential for enhancing the safety and effectiveness of India's aerial nuclear deterrent.

India maintains a nuclear policy based on "No First Use" and aims for a "credible minimum deterrence." This strategy relies on a nuclear triad – the ability to launch nuclear weapons from land, sea, and air – to guarantee a retaliatory strike capability.

While the land-based Agni missile series and sea-based assets like the Arihant-class submarines carrying K-series ballistic missiles provide robust second-strike options, the air component depends on free-fall bombs. This older technology potentially exposes IAF pilots and expensive aircraft to significant risks when facing advanced enemy air defences, weakening the overall credibility of the air leg of the triad.

The challenge lies in the increasing sophistication of air defence networks in the region. Potential adversaries operate advanced systems, such as China's S-400 and HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles, and Pakistan continues to upgrade its air defence capabilities.

Flying directly over or near heavily defended zones to drop a gravity bomb makes the delivery aircraft highly vulnerable to detection and interception. This significantly increases the risk of the mission failing and the loss of valuable assets and personnel, potentially undermining India's ability to retaliate effectively from the air.

Modern air-launched nuclear missiles offer a compelling alternative by providing a "standoff" capability. Missiles like the French ASMP-A (compatible with Rafale jets) or similar systems used by other major powers can be launched from hundreds of kilometres away from the target. This allows the launch aircraft to remain outside the effective range of many enemy air defence systems, greatly improving the safety of the crew and the likelihood of mission success.

Adopting such technology would bring India's aerial nuclear delivery systems in line with contemporary international standards and provide a more assured retaliatory option.

The IAF already possesses aircraft platforms suitable for carrying such advanced weaponry. The Rafale fighter jets, acquired starting in 2020, are known to be compatible with air-launched missiles like the ASMP-A in French service.

Furthermore, the Su-30 MKI, which forms a large part of the IAF's fighter strength, is a versatile platform that could likely be adapted to carry a future Indian air-launched nuclear missile through dedicated integration programs. Transitioning to missiles would also simplify handling and deployment logistics compared to gravity bombs.

India's Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) possesses considerable expertise in missile technology, suggesting indigenous development is a viable path. The successful development and integration of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile (an India-Russia joint venture) onto the Su-30 MKI platform demonstrates this capability.

DRDO could potentially develop a new nuclear-capable air-launched missile or adapt existing designs. Alternatively, India could explore acquiring such technology through collaboration with strategic partners like France, which has previously engaged in defence technology transfers.

The strategic need for this technological shift is pressing. In a scenario demanding nuclear retaliation, ensuring the survival of the delivery platform is critical for a credible response. Sending aircraft into heavily contested airspace risks mission failure before the weapon can be deployed, thereby weakening India's second-strike assurance.

An air-launched missile fired from a safe distance ensures the IAF can hold distant targets at risk while minimizing exposure to enemy defences. This enhanced capability would significantly strengthen India's deterrence posture and force potential adversaries to adjust their own defence strategies.
 
I believe the Rafale is nuclear capable as confirmed by France during the initial deal in 2015, so I don't think that would be an issue, although the actual nuclear capable missile would be a mystery since India may or may not possess a sufficiently miniaturized nuclear warhead to fit on a smaller tactical missile like the ASMP-A, or a newer missile needs to be developed.
 
India urgently needs to develop an air launched missile that can carry a large nuclear warhead. This allows us to move missiles across the country more quickly to where we need them to be but also launch them from a good and safe distance. Launching ballistic missiles can be intercepted but a jet and its missile can fly low or avoid areas thats heavily defended with SAM.

Hopefully they can develop the ALCM with a range of at least1000km or more that can fly under the radar and not be intercepted by any SAM.
 
Very logical that nuclear-capable air-launched missiles are needed. It will be a huge, huge deterrent for our mischievous neighbours. DRDO must start working on this, if not already done.
 
Lol BrahMos is already nuclear capable and nuclear capable versions are already deployed. India is just keeping quiet about it.
 
I believe the Rafale is nuclear capable as confirmed by France during the initial deal in 2015, so I don't think that would be an issue, although the actual nuclear capable missile would be a mystery since India may or may not possess a sufficiently miniaturized nuclear warhead to fit on a smaller tactical missile like the ASMP-A, or a newer missile needs to be developed.
Did you forget the tests of kilo and sub-kiloton in Pokhran-2 (Operation Shakti) on 11th and 13th May 1998?
 
I believe the Rafale is nuclear capable as confirmed by France during the initial deal in 2015, so I don't think that would be an issue, although the actual nuclear capable missile would be a mystery since India may or may not possess a sufficiently miniaturized nuclear warhead to fit on a smaller tactical missile like the ASMP-A, or a newer missile needs to be developed.
Our fission bombs were revealed to weigh only 150 kg, revealed in the book "Weapons of Peace" by Raj Chengappa, but of course, thermonuclear will weigh more. However, the 8-17 kiloton warheads we have are tiny.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,468
Messages
48,236
Members
3,024
Latest member
Jit1973
Back
Top