IAF Favours Indigenous LCH Prachand to Replace Ageing Mi-35 Hind, Halting Additional Apache Imports

IAF Favours Indigenous LCH Prachand to Replace Ageing Mi-35 Hind, Halting Additional Apache Imports


The Indian Air Force (IAF) is set to significantly reshape its attack helicopter capabilities, confirming plans to retire its fleet of ageing Mi-35 Hind gunships by the 2030s.

These Soviet-era helicopters will be succeeded by the domestically produced Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) Prachand, marking a major boost for India's indigenous defence sector.

The IAF currently operates one squadron of Mi-35 helicopters, which entered service in the 1980s. These robust aircraft have served reliably in roles requiring close air support and anti-tank firepower.

To ensure operational readiness until their planned retirement, the existing Mi-35s are undergoing a major refurbishment programme with Russian technical support, extending their service life until the end of this decade.

In a strategic move highlighting self-reliance, the IAF has decided that the LCH Prachand, developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), will replace the Mi-35. This decision comes despite the Prachand belonging to a lighter weight category than the Mi-35.

Furthermore, the IAF has decided against acquiring more AH-64E Apache attack helicopters from Boeing, beyond the 22 currently in service which were inducted between 2019 and 2021.

An IAF official stated, "The LCH-Prachand will not just replace the Mi-35 but will emerge as the largest attack helicopter fleet type in our inventory soon," signifying strong confidence in the indigenous platform.

The LCH Prachand is specifically designed for agility and performance in challenging environments unique to India, particularly high-altitude mountain warfare.

Weighing significantly less than the Mi-35 (5.8 tons maximum takeoff weight compared to 11.5 tons), the Prachand excels in maneuverability. It possesses the capability to operate effectively at altitudes up to 6,500 metres (21,300 feet), a critical advantage demonstrated during trials in Ladakh, which heavier helicopters like the Mi-35 find difficult.

The Prachand is equipped with a modern sensor suite, a 20mm turret gun, rocket systems, and can carry air-to-air missiles (like the Mistral 2) and air-to-ground missiles (such as the Dhruvastra).

While the heavily armoured Mi-35 was built for direct assaults and carrying troops, the LCH Prachand incorporates modern design elements like reduced radar cross-section (stealth features), advanced avionics for navigation and targeting, and focuses on delivering precise firepower.

This transition reflects an evolving operational approach within the IAF, valuing versatility, high-altitude performance, and indigenous technology alongside combat power.

The commitment to the LCH Prachand is underscored by procurement plans. Fifteen helicopters from an initial Limited Series Production batch are already being inducted (10 for IAF, 5 for the Indian Army).

More significantly, final approval is anticipated for a large order of 156 additional LCH Prachands – 114 designated for the Army and 42 for the Air Force. This substantial order, once finalised, will establish the Prachand as the cornerstone of India's attack helicopter force for the foreseeable future.

The gradual phasing out of the Mi-35, facilitated by its life extension overhaul, will coincide with the increasing induction of the LCH Prachand. This transition marks a notable shift away from reliance on foreign legacy systems towards bolstering India's own advanced defence manufacturing capabilities.
 
LCH has altitude advantage , if good sensor. Suit and ability to guide artillery with rounds like copper head that lock to laser, then with a laser pod ,this can be a force multiplier as artillery rounds in mountains due to rarefied atmosphere travel 10 km more but are then highly inaccurate also so lots of ammo is spent trying to adjust the azimuth of guns, but laser locking rounds like US copper head and Russian also can be used huge standoff and massive punch .
 
We must develop glide bombs, laser locking artillery shells and other precision weapons so less wastage, massive impact on enemy moral is there . This WW 2 mentality is existent so are 105 mm field guns and mortars so must make shells and weapons smart and rest will be good .
 
I love the concept of the Hind. A heavily armored attack helicopter with enough space to transport troops, flies very fast, and overall menacing looking.

Disadvantages - Very bad infrared signature, main gun was only 12.7mm machine gun, Late models had a fixed unmovable 30mm cannon. Optics, night sights, sensors were all trash. Didn't carry a good anti tank missile for the longest time. Lack of radar for radar guided missile. Typical with ALL Russian platforms - UNRELIABLE AND MAINTENANCE HEAVY ENGINES. Also needed a short runway to take off.
 
LCH prachand non comparable to MI -35 flying tank, need to make a heavy attack helicopter based on IMRH.
With more advanced weapons and sensors, and overall switch from Gun based anti aircraft system to missile based, LCH does pretty much the same job but better.

Laser guided rockets means you can carry less rockets and have a double to triple times better hit ratio than many more unguided rockets that Hind carried.
 
LCH is not a heavy attack helicopter...MI35 can not be replaced with LCH...either India should make a heavy attack helicopter or buy some more Apache...LCH can not match with Apache...Apache is a different beast....
 
We should heavily upgrade the Hind. I mean just keep the concept as it is and use composite materials to keep the heli light as well as composite armor to keep it protected. Also use 30mm autocannon in a turret just like Mi-28. Also use advanced optics and small aesa radar. Its a great heli then with good export potential.
 
We should heavily upgrade the Hind. I mean just keep the concept as it is and use composite materials to keep the heli light as well as composite armor to keep it protected. Also use 30mm autocannon in a turret just like Mi-28. Also use advanced optics and small aesa radar. Its a great heli then with good export potential.
They already have built what you said. Israel actually worked with russia to make it.

NOBODY BOUGHT IT.

Russia also worked with South Africa for a similar version. Only Algeria bought it.

Overall failed in export for modernized versions.
 
LCH prachand non comparable to MI -35 flying tank, need to make a heavy attack helicopter based on IMRH.
Mi-35 is to be phased out, that's why we procure Apache attack helicopters. And comparing heavy attack helicopters to LCH is the most senseless article I have ever seen. LCH's majority role is the high mountain region, while Apache is in deserts and plain terrain like Mi 35.
 
LCH is not a heavy attack helicopter...MI35 can not be replaced with LCH...either India should make a heavy attack helicopter or buy some more Apache...LCH can not match with Apache...Apache is a different beast....
For that IAF has to issue RFI but they did not till now but HAL is looking forward that if IAF requests for a heavy weight one they can work on it.
 
Mi-35 is to be phased out, that's why we procure Apache attack helicopters. And comparing heavy attack helicopters to LCH is the most senseless article I have ever seen. LCH's majority role is the high mountain region, while Apache is in deserts and plain terrain like Mi 35.
Not exactly. There is no reason why LCH cannot operate in deserts and plains too.

The reason we bought Apache is because apache is much more advanced than LCH. Its not about weight difference. Yes LCH is designed for high altitude but it can operate anywhere.

Apache has radar, hellfire missile, VERY ACCURATE 30mm cannon, advanced sensors, advanced countermeasures. Proven and reliable platform.

LCH lacks all that. LCH doesn't even have an anti tank missile right now. LCH's optics are inferior, gun is not very accurate nor lethal enough. Lack a radar and connectivity like Apache does. Lacks a track record that apache has.
 
Earlier, HAL itself claimed that they can make Heavyweight version of Prachand if GoI wanted to. But GoI already said that that it is not interested in such development.
 
I love the concept of the Hind. A heavily armored attack helicopter with enough space to transport troops, flies very fast, and overall menacing looking.

Disadvantages - Very bad infrared signature, main gun was only 12.7mm machine gun, Late models had a fixed unmovable 30mm cannon. Optics, night sights, sensors were all trash. Didn't carry a good anti tank missile for the longest time. Lack of radar for radar guided missile. Typical with ALL Russian platforms - UNRELIABLE AND MAINTENANCE HEAVY ENGINES. Also needed a short runway to take off.
You are right, although in trying to do both roles of attack helicopter and troop transport, it kinda failed to execute any one of them proficiently. Although, to be sure, when it was introduced in the mid-60s, it was a very advanced and pioneering platform, failed mostly by inferior Soviet avionics, sensors, weapons, and of course, engines.
 
Hopefully nothing like Dhruv will happen in the future with prachand where the entire fleet is grounded due to some technical problems.
 
Earlier, HAL itself claimed that they can make Heavyweight version of Prachand if GoI wanted to. But GoI already said that that it is not interested in such development.
Did the air force want it? No. Unlike previous projects developed by HAL it has always started a project that the air force wants and needs like Dhruv, Rudra, Prachand, IMRH, CATS drone program etc.
 
India should definitely overhaul and upgrade the technology, new weapons, EW, helicopter computer and software etc as we need it to combat modern threats.

I think that these helicopter’s retirement will only start from 2035 onwards as it will take a while to manufacture the Prachand helicopter in sufficient numbers to replace the Mi 35. Also there might be the possibility of manufacturing delays with HAL so 10 years seem more realistic.

Also India does need to 100% indigenously design, develop and manufacture a medium/heavy attack helicopters as we will need to increase our firepower and its capabilities with more modern ATGM, air to air missiles, more modern rockets, modern and higher calibre machine guns, EW, use surveillance and loiter/kamikaze drones etc. We can create a stealth, fast, nimble etc helicopter similarly like the Prachand helicopter. HAL could have at least developed one on paper which can be ready straight away if they want it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,773
Messages
50,385
Members
3,176
Latest member
Blitz
Back
Top