IAF Showcases Rafale with Meteor BVRAAM at R-Day, Quells Speculations of Integration Delays

IAF Showcases Rafale with Meteor BVRAAM at R-Day, Quells Speculations of Integration Delays


For Indian aviation enthusiasts and defence observers, the wait for definitive proof is finally over. The Indian Air Force (IAF) has publicly confirmed that its fleet of Dassault Rafale fighters is fully equipped with the lethal Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles (BVRAAMs).

This confirmation came in the form of high-resolution imagery captured during today’s Republic Day flypast over Kartavya Path, effectively putting an end to months of suspense regarding the weapon system's operational status.

Ending the Speculation​

For a considerable period, the defence community has been rife with questions regarding the integration of the Meteor missile with the Indian Rafale fleet.

The Meteor is widely regarded as a game-changer in aerial combat, featuring a unique ramjet propulsion system that allows it to throttle its engine during flight.

Unlike traditional solid-fuel missiles that burn out quickly, the Meteor maintains powered flight to the target, offering an operational range in excess of 100 km and a "no-escape zone" significantly larger than comparable weapons.

This capability was a primary driver behind India’s procurement of the Rafale, promising unmatched dominance against regional aerial threats.

Despite these capabilities on paper, doubts had lingered in the public sphere.

Speculation was fuelled by the absence of the missile in previous public displays and exercises, leading some analysts to theorise that certification hurdles or supply chain delays might be hindering its deployment.

The lack of clear visual evidence had sparked intense debate on online defence forums about whether the IAF had truly cleared the weapon for frontline combat duties.

Visual Confirmation over Kartavya Path​

The narrative shifted decisively on 26 January as the IAF executed a spectacular aerial display for the 77th Republic Day celebrations.

During the flypast, multiple Rafale jets participated in complex formations, including the "Sindoor" spearhead group and the six-aircraft "Vajraang" formation.

Sharp-eyed observers immediately noted that several of these jets were carrying live ordnance under their wings.

Within minutes, images taken by broadcasters and amateur spotters began circulating on social media.

Although some initial photos were grainy—zoomed-in shots from vantage points along the parade route—they provided undeniable evidence.

The missile’s distinctive intake ducts, elongated fuselage, and specific fin configuration matched the profile of the MBDA Meteor perfectly.

Veteran aviation trackers, some of whom have chronicled IAF serial numbers for decades, corroborated the sighting, celebrating it as the first public validation of the Meteor in Indian skies.

Operational Maturity​

The timing of this reveal is significant, coming shortly after "Operation Sindoor," a high-intensity aerial campaign where the Rafale fleet played a central role in precision strikes.

The display serves as a subtle yet powerful rebuttal to earlier scepticism. It signals that the IAF has not only taken delivery of the missiles but has also fully integrated them into its standard operating procedures.

For defence experts, these visuals represent a critical milestone. The presence of the Meteor in a high-visibility national parade indicates that the system is no longer merely a contractual promise or a test asset; it is a fully operational reality.

This integration substantially enhances India's air defence posture, providing a credible deterrent in contested airspace.

As the roar of the engines faded over Delhi, the message delivered by the images remained clear: the Rafale’s most potent long-range capability is active, cleared, and ready for deployment.

In an age where visual proof often carries more weight than official statements, today’s flypast has settled the debate once and for all.
 
Wow, what a achievement. France integrated a missile that they produce and charge 10x what Indian missile costs. An achievement would be an Indian missile has been integrated. Endless propaganda on this site.
 
Why was the Tejas removed from the Republic Day Flypast? WS it because if a crash in Dubai? But that blame was attributed soley to Pilot by HAL. Do we not have confidence in a single engine aircraft our own Tejas to fly? Then how do you expect the world to appreciate. If said that for safety purposes, then life of pilot is OK?
 
That was not blame, it was unfortunate for pilot bcz when pilot goes against gravity then came down sharply wid too much speed then again tries to go up against gravity, blood flows in brain nd pilot got blind for seconds.. Waha hua accident boss.. Dnt blame govt, Divers hi doobte hai aur pilots hi crash hote hai.
 
Why was the Tejas removed from the Republic Day Flypast? WS it because if a crash in Dubai? But that blame was attributed soley to Pilot by HAL. Do we not have confidence in a single engine aircraft our own Tejas to fly? Then how do you expect the world to appreciate. If said that for safety purposes, then life of pilot is OK?
Very true brother... It was really disheartening to see the Tejas not participating in the parade... We are debating and promoting the indigenous efforts so much, yet the ready flying already incorporated Tejas was not flying in the display truly lowers confidence
 
That was not blame, it was unfortunate for pilot bcz when pilot goes against gravity then came down sharply wid too much speed then again tries to go up against gravity, blood flows in brain nd pilot got blind for seconds.. Waha hua accident boss.. Dnt blame govt, Divers hi doobte hai aur pilots hi crash hote hai.
I still feel it was not pilot error. The poor guy is not alive to state what happened.
 
But there's still the question that when they were integrated
So when you buy a car, you integrate the tyres a few months after you take delivery of the car. Meteors were very much integrated when the Rafales were delivered.

However, let me really extend your conspiracy theory. Actually the Rafales that flew in Op Sindoor were all French AF Rafales, flown by French pilots. The Rafales that flew in the RD Parade are actually all French Rafales hastily painted with Indian colors and numbers. They were even flown French pilots. We don't have any Rafales and no pilots trained to fly them.


How is that for some real conspiracy theory????
 
Why was the Tejas removed from the Republic Day Flypast? WS it because if a crash in Dubai? But that blame was attributed soley to Pilot by HAL. Do we not have confidence in a single engine aircraft our own Tejas to fly? Then how do you expect the world to appreciate. If said that for safety purposes, then life of pilot is OK?
Just to clarify, no single engine ac is ever flown in a RD flypast. This rule has been there for many decades. The reason is simple. If by chance a bird strike results in an engine failure, there is no time to re-start the engine. An ejection WILL happen. Now imagine a densely populated area and the number of casualties on the ground. In a twin or multi-engine ac, even if it happens the ac can exit the populated areas.

There has been only one exception to this rule where a single engine fighter was permitted one year. No it wasn't the famed Mirage-2000, but our very own Tejas, to showcase Atmanirbhar Bharat. Date was 26 Jan 2017.
 
So when you buy a car, you integrate the tyres a few months after you take delivery of the car. Meteors were very much integrated when the Rafales were delivered.

However, let me really extend your conspiracy theory. Actually the Rafales that flew in Op Sindoor were all French AF Rafales, flown by French pilots. The Rafales that flew in the RD Parade are actually all French Rafales hastily painted with Indian colors and numbers. They were even flown French pilots. We don't have any Rafales and no pilots trained to fly them.


How is that for some real conspiracy theory????
What's the source when you are saying:- "Meteors were very much integrated when the Rafales were delivered" the first batch of 5 rafales arrived in 29 June 2020 while the meteor entered service in March 2023 ,and that's not conspiracy that's a genuine question that the very killer missile over which the jet thrives, was used in a conflict or not?
 
What's the source when you are saying:- "Meteors were very much integrated when the Rafales were delivered" the first batch of 5 rafales arrived in 29 June 2020 while the meteor entered service in March 2023 ,and that's not conspiracy that's a genuine question that the very killer missile over which the jet thrives, was used in a conflict or not?
The keyword here is "officially". I won't say anything more.
 
There is nothing great in showcasing Rafale with Meteor. It's French.
While, I agree with your statement, let me share another tidbit with you. IAF never flies with live weapons for ceremonial displays ( RD flypast etc), except during fire power displays where spectators are kept at a safe distance. Another reason is that sophisticated weapons are stored under special conditions. Exposure to elements and flight reduces their life.

The probable reason for Meteors being displayed was two fold. Post Sindoor, Paki and other propaganda handles had kept on about IAF not having Meteors and multiple ac being shot down including Rafale tail no BS-022. Many even on this forum believed it. So the IAF probably flew both the Meteor and BS-022 in the flypast.
 
Then how can you say that meteor were integrated at the first place
Because the first Meteor was tested on a Rafale M back in 2005. The Meteor was fully integrated into French Rafales before the Indian order. Since the Indian order included the Meteor, any sensible company would integrate the cabling and other hardware and software during the manufacturing itself. At least if I were in Dassault, I would do that. Maybe in your universe you do it differently.
 
Because the first Meteor was tested on a Rafale M back in 2005. The Meteor was fully integrated into French Rafales before the Indian order. Since the Indian order included the Meteor, any sensible company would integrate the cabling and other hardware and software during the manufacturing itself. At least if I were in Dassault, I would do that. Maybe in your universe you do it differently.
If the hardware and software are integrated then it doesn't confirms that the missile was already installed, and it's not me or you according to which any company would take decisions (even IAF couldn't make them run according to them)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
6,212
Messages
62,310
Members
4,878
Latest member
meganhok1999
Back
Top