India Plans Major Overhaul to Extend Lifespan of IL-76 Transport Fleet

In a move to bolster its strategic airlift capabilities, India is exploring a major overhaul program to extend the operational lifespan of its aging fleet of Soviet-era IL-76 heavy transport aircraft.

The Indian Air Force (IAF) is collaborating with Russia to address the fleet's dwindling availability and outdated systems.

The IAF's IL-76 fleet, acquired in the 1980s, has served for nearly four decades. The aircraft face limitations due to their existing D-30KP engines, which have restricted operational time, and outdated avionics, making them incompatible with modern civilian air traffic control systems.

To counter these challenges, the IAF plans to replace the engines with fuel-efficient PS-90A engines (used on the IAF's IL-78 tankers) and upgrade navigation and communication systems for compatibility with international standards.

India has initiated a joint assessment with Russia's National Aviation Service Company to evaluate the overhaul's feasibility. This assessment will consider crucial factors like airframe condition, 'time between overhauls,' and the overall remaining lifespan of the 11 IL-76MD aircraft in the IAF's fleet.

If the evaluation proves positive, it could pave the way for a collaborative India-Russia upgrade program, extending the IL-76 fleet's operational life until 2050.

Notably, the IAF has previously implemented some upgrades to the fleet, including modernized electronics and navigation systems, along with structural modifications like the rear defensive turret removal.

Conclusion​

This potential India-Russia joint venture underscores India's commitment to maintaining a robust strategic airlift capacity. Extending the IL-76 fleet's lifespan would provide a valuable boost to India's ability to quickly transport troops and equipment in times of crisis or conflict.

 

[Apocalypse gupta]

Oh boy, and here we go!

MiG-21 saga Part 2: Electric Boogaloo!

"It's better! It's larger! It's got four times the number of engines!"

Well, we are getting newer engines for this. And since there are 4 engines, even if 1 fails, it wont lead to loss of aircraft.

These large Transport aircraft are very resilient. Their accident is much much rarer than fighter jets.

Cutting edge tech is not really priority for transport aircraft. As long as it is able to carry enough stuff from A to B, it is OK. these things will have fighter escorts during wartime. To protect them.

 

[beencensured]

Oh boy, and here we go!

MiG-21 saga Part 2: Electric Boogaloo!

"It's better! It's larger! It's got four times the number of engines!"

total nonsense comment as the plane is reliable in that has practically no crashes, and it is cheaper to upgrade. My thoughts is how efficient is the PS-90A engine compared to others. Second one of these aircraft can be converted to flying testbed.

 

[పవన్కుమార్]

Modify it use it as test bed aircraft for kaveri engine trials

 

[Sandeep]

Currently the only quick, easy and financially cheap route is to upgrade and overhaul the entire technology, equipment, parts and engines which will give it another 10+ years of service. This should give us enough time to arrange a deal with a foreign company and make it in India or develop our own indigenous version which seems unlikely as we haven't reached that stage where we can.

Another problem is that the current available transporters are very expensive to buy even if we made parts of it India. The only ideal and cheap solution was to buy more C-19 heavy transporters as the price was low and they were closing the production line but as usual the corrupt jihadi party were interested in earning more commissions rather than put the country first. The current IL-76MD caters more to a medium weight transporter and its still cheaper than the current alternative with France, USA or embraer.

If we want to replace the IL-76MD in the next decade or increase the numbers we buy then we should make them in India with the latest technology, equipment, parts and engines so we can learn how to design and develop our own similar version in future. With the current war in Ukraine Russia needs the money and we could get a good deal with a large amount of the technology transferred and local production which the USA, France, Italy or embraer won't offer.

Although the best option is to retire the IL76MD over the next decade and instead make a deal with Ukraine to replace them. Currently Ukraine have designed and developed the An-70 which is a much better transporter with better capabilities than the Russian transporter. India should make it in India with a large amount of the technology transferred and local production allowed. Ukraine need the money and they don't have the capability to manufacture it in Ukraine as their military industry is destroyed so we can get a very good deal and learn how to make transporters so in future we can replace these with an indigenous transporter.

 

[beencensured]

Considering that the 17 Il-76s were inducted between 1986 and 1988, that means even the newest Il-76 will be 62 years old by 2050. The MiG-21, as a type, has been in service for 62 years now.

It has a better safety record and it cost less to upgrade then buy new.

 

[beencensured]

variant of kaveri can be used as MTA engines

Different class of engine, but yes the technology could have been applied to MTA type engine generation more thrust. IAF prefers turbo props for MTA.

 

[Avada kedavra]

Yeah just like how north Korea has done upgrades and extended the life of the cold war era mig 15s. 🤣

My hate for Indian military keeps increasing day by day.

 

[Anant]

total nonsense comment as the plane is reliable in that has practically no crashes, and it is cheaper to upgrade. My thoughts is how efficient is the PS-90A engine compared to others. Second one of these aircraft can be converted to flying testbed.

Please try understanding sarcasm when you see it.

As for the aircraft itself, well, it is more reliable than the MiG-21. However, it should also be noted that you will see fewer crashes when you have 17 aircraft than when you have 810.

That said, this is a practice the IAF needs to come out of. The Il-76s are already planned to serve for almost 50 years by 2035. Extending that to 65 years doesn't help matters in the slightest.

That said, with the retirement of these aircraft looming, we should certainly be looking to convert one of these as a flying engine testbed alongside a MiG-29 or Su-30MKI.

 

[Anant]

Well, we are getting newer engines for this. And since there are 4 engines, even if 1 fails, it wont lead to loss of aircraft.

These large Transport aircraft are very resilient. Their accident is much much rarer than fighter jets.

Cutting edge tech is not really priority for transport aircraft. As long as it is able to carry enough stuff from A to B, it is OK. these things will have fighter escorts during wartime. To protect them.

Boss, as I said, having four engines helps with reliability certainly. However there is also the probability bias here in that you will see far more accidents in 810 or so MiG-21s than you would see in 17 Il-76s. However, these aircraft are becoming very old, and even with new engines, it remains to be seen how much life the airframe has.

 

[beencensured]

Please try understanding sarcasm when you see it.

As for the aircraft itself, well, it is more reliable than the MiG-21. However, it should also be noted that you will see fewer crashes when you have 17 aircraft than when you have 810.

That said, this is a practice the IAF needs to come out of. The Il-76s are already planned to serve for almost 50 years by 2035. Extending that to 65 years doesn't help matters in the slightest.

That said, with the retirement of these aircraft looming, we should certainly be looking to convert one of these as a flying engine testbed alongside a MiG-29 or Su-30MKI.

Given the standards of Americans and Chinese in retirement, we should follow them instead of following arms merchants.

 

[Pink Panther]

This has nothing to do with atmanjrbharta. We will be doing this with russian help, using russian part and engines. Replacing these aircraft with indian made MTA would have been atmanirbharta

We need brand new platform, extending the life of ancient products is a waste of time and money and value , these life extensions won’t last long due to stress and wear and tear these products incurred during their years of use.

 

[Apocalypse gupta]

We need brand new platform, extending the life of ancient products is a waste of time and money and value , these life extensions won’t last long due to stress and wear and tear these products incurred during their years of use.

the job of a transport aircraft, is to take a lot of cargo from point A to B. It is not a fighter jet involved in combat that it needs to be cutting edge and ahead of the curve. As long as it is cheaper to upgrade older aircraft instead of buying new, we should go for it. Even America does the same. Most of their transport fleet comprises of decades old models and design and they always go for upgrades and refurbishment rather than completely new design. They still use bomobers from the 60s-70s with upgrades today.

 

[Pink Panther]

the job of a transport aircraft, is to take a lot of cargo from point A to B. It is not a fighter jet involved in combat that it needs to be cutting edge and ahead of the curve. As long as it is cheaper to upgrade older aircraft instead of buying new, we should go for it. Even America does the same. Most of their transport fleet comprises of decades old models and design and they always go for upgrades and refurbishment rather than completely new design. They still use bomobers from the 60s-70s with upgrades today.

But still wear and tear happens in any product due to age.