Ironbird Facility to Accelerate Tejas Mk2 Development

Ironbird Facility to Accelerate Tejas Mk2 Development


The development of India's indigenous Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk2 is progressing with the introduction of an Ironbird facility. This crucial hardware-in-loop (HIL) testing environment is designed to evaluate the aircraft's Integrated Flight Control System (IFCS) in a simulated flight environment before actual flight testing begins.

Tenders reveal that the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) intends to commence testing key Tejas Mk2 systems within the Ironbird facility. These include the onboard computers responsible for flight control, auxiliary functions, and mission management. The facility will replicate the data acquisition process of the actual aircraft, collecting data in various formats from simulated sensors and systems.

The Ironbird facility essentially functions as a flight simulator, mimicking the Tejas Mk2's hardware components such as cockpits and projection systems. A network of Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) is configured similarly to the real aircraft, and a hydraulic source simulates the power systems for flight controls.

By injecting a range of flight scenarios and operational stresses into the IFCS, engineers can analyze the resulting data to assess the system's performance and stability under various conditions. This rigorous testing process helps identify and resolve potential issues before the aircraft takes to the skies, ensuring a smoother transition to real-world flight testing.

The development of the Tejas Mk2 represents a significant advancement in India's indigenous aerospace capabilities. The Ironbird facility is a testament to the commitment to thorough testing and evaluation, ensuring the safety and effectiveness of the aircraft. As the project progresses, the Tejas Mk2 promises to bolster India's air defence capabilities and contribute to its growing reputation as a global player in aerospace technology.
 
It's not. It's still a LCA. That has been confirmed by HAL, IAF and ADA itself. It's not in the medium category. And if indeed it gets into that category, then it's useless because IAF is looking for light category jets.
It will eat into MRFA orders to say the least. It might even kill it and focus moves to AMCA.

BTW, F21 and Gripen is allowed in MRFA as medium weight fighters. Our IAF is so uniquely biased.
 
It will eat into MRFA orders to say the least. It might even kill it and focus moves to AMCA.

BTW, F21 and Gripen is allowed in MRFA as medium weight fighters. Our IAF is so uniquely biased.
F21 has a much higher payload capacity. And Gripen after testing was found to be not suitable for MMRCA. So IAF did no favoritism. Even Gripen was rejected as it was not in Medium category. As for MRFA, the only thing that could have killed it was timely production which is now not possible as Mk2 won't be coming before at least 2040. Massive massive delays by ADA and HAL. So no point.
 
The Mk 2 is no more LCA. It is now a Medium Combat Aircraft. AYW has gone up, fuselage extended, canards added. This will also be the base platform for AMCA development.
A few critical points from maintenance point of view which was not adhered in Mk 1.
  1. Design MTBF, MTTR and MMH/FH must be closely tracked, provided ADA has defined these in their CDR.
  2. All TTGSE should be ergonomically designed for multiple shifts in sqn operations during detachments.
  3. Aircraft systems reliability is critical. Unlike Mk 1 which has just 50% serv today, Mk 2 should maintain minimum 75%>
  4. A complete Maintainability audit must be done by IAF-PMt before metal cutting.
  5. Lightning test of the first aircraft and every 10th production is a must. This was not done for Mk 1 and is a flight safety hazard
Mk1 has just 50% service availability? That's surprising. In Gagan Shakti Tejas had the highest availability of all aircraft with operations at 6 sorties per day. Does this mean all other fighters have <50%?
 
The Mk 2 is no more LCA. It is now a Medium Combat Aircraft. AYW has gone up, fuselage extended, canards added. This will also be the base platform for AMCA development.
A few critical points from maintenance point of view which was not adhered in Mk 1.
  1. Design MTBF, MTTR and MMH/FH must be closely tracked, provided ADA has defined these in their CDR.
  2. All TTGSE should be ergonomically designed for multiple shifts in sqn operations during detachments.
  3. Aircraft systems reliability is critical. Unlike Mk 1 which has just 50% serv today, Mk 2 should maintain minimum 75%>
  4. A complete Maintainability audit must be done by IAF-PMt before metal cutting.
  5. Lightning test of the first aircraft and every 10th production is a must. This was not done for Mk 1 and is a flight safety hazard
With due respect, as of now Tejas MK2 is no more than a fantasy. Every feature is a "will be this, will be that, will be world class, ground breaking" and all sorts of claims. Let us wait to see what is actually delivered, if at all and most importantly, when?? !!!
 
Just cancel Tejas mk1a and divert order for mk2 instead.... Iaf should stop wasting money and time on a not suitable aircraft version 😹😹😹
 

Forum statistics

Threads
4,208
Messages
43,273
Members
2,756
Latest member
Navneet Vinod Kumar
Back
Top